![]() |
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
Apparently, since im not able to start a new thread thought id throw this in here. Vikings Close to deal to aquire Randy Moss from Pats
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/05/source-vikings-moss-havent-started-talking-terms-yet/]Source: Vikings, Moss haven't started talking terms yet | ProFootballTalk.com[/url] I guess that takes the Vikings out of the Vincent Jackson bidding. |
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
[quote=PHazard;743736]Apparently, since im not able to start a new thread thought id throw this in here. Vikings Close to deal to aquire Randy Moss from Pats
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/05/source-vikings-moss-havent-started-talking-terms-yet/]Source: Vikings, Moss haven't started talking terms yet | ProFootballTalk.com[/url] I guess that takes the Vikings out of the Vincent Jackson bidding.[/quote] Why can't u start a new thread? |
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
prob dont have enough posts.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
You only need 10
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
[quote=SmootSmack;743647]Personally I had more fun with this one
[url]http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/29611-campbell-feels-disrespected-wont-return.html[/url] Either way, done packing now so I'll update the thread title to prevent any more heart attacks[/quote] Hey SS are living your job? I ask because of your "Last Day" sig and your where talking about finishing packing. |
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
Moving offices, will no longer be at the main headquarters though I'm sure I will be there occasionally for meetings. Anyhow, in an empire state of mind right now. Possibly in another country altogether this time next year. Just part of some organizational shifts to focus on upcoming businesses that has me leaving Bristol.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
Lynch would have been scary on the Packers.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
He's only 24 ... I wonder why the Bills didn't want him. He runs hard -- would have been nice to get him -- but, a 4th and a conditional might be too much.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
[quote=GhettoDogAllStars;743879]He's only 24 ... I wonder why the Bills didn't want him. He runs hard -- would have been nice to get him -- but, a 4th and a conditional might be too much.[/quote]
In my opinion, two words: CJ Spiller. They may have been just trying to get value before he would have become just a cheap backup. |
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
They have Spiller and Jackson. Lynch was the odd man out.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
They got Spiller because they didn't want Lynch. Obviously they had their mind made up about Lynch before drafting Spiller. I mean, they drafted Lynch in the first round, then a couple years later they draft Spiller and trade Lynch for a 4th. What? The dude's only 24. He's no odd man out -- they drafted him as a franchise back, then they decided he needed to be replaced. I just wonder why.
|
Re: Seahawks Trade for Marshawn Lynch
[quote=GhettoDogAllStars;744033]They got Spiller because they didn't want Lynch. Obviously they had their mind made up about Lynch before drafting Spiller. I mean, they drafted Lynch in the first round, then a couple years later they draft Spiller and trade Lynch for a 4th. What? The dude's only 24. He's no odd man out -- they drafted him as a franchise back, then they decided he needed to be replaced. I just wonder why.[/quote]
Pretty simple, Lynch wasn't drafted by this current regime and he wore out his welcome with the suspensions. Plus the emergence of Fred Jackson factors in. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.