![]() |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
Henderson I could see making the team, Stallworth? Not so much.
Garcon Morgan Hankerson Robinson Moss Henderson Not the depth chart order just naming them. But I could easily see Henderson making the team. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Sonny9TD;1011869]Good signing. Need help at the WR and [B]Henderson may be ready to bust out[/B]. Shanahan is making some nice moves. Excited about this team. If Garcon can stay healthy and our new tight end is for real we could be loaded for bear. Cows too. Most excellent.[/quote]
Since 2009 Henderson has not had more than 35 catches, 500 yards, or 2 TD's in a single year. What about those numbers indicates "ready to bust out" rather than "ready to guard the gatorade"? |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
Not hating on the guy but I think this take below is pretty reasonable
@Rich_TandlerCSN 14h I'd tap the brakes on Henderson enthusiasm. Started 10 games and had only 22 rec on a team that threw almost 700 times. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Mattyk;1011893]Not hating on the guy but I think this take below is pretty reasonable
@Rich_TandlerCSN 14h I'd tap the brakes on Henderson enthusiasm. Started 10 games and had only 22 rec on a team that threw almost 700 times.[/quote] The iggles ( T ) J. Peters should have " tapped his brakes " ..... [url=http://bleacherreport.com/tb/daB8t?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=nfl]Eagles’ Jason Peters arrested for drag racing, fleeing police | ProFootballTalk[/url]. Arrested for drag racing ... |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
Much rather see an undrafted WR step up and take a spot than either Henderson or Donte
|
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=budw38;1011895]The iggles ( T ) J. Peters should have " tapped his brakes " ..... [url=http://bleacherreport.com/tb/daB8t?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=nfl]Eagles’ Jason Peters arrested for drag racing, fleeing police | ProFootballTalk[/url]. Arrested for drag racing ...[/quote]
dumb and very dangerous. F8ck the eagles |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Chico23231;1011896]Much rather see an undrafted WR step up and take a spot than either Henderson or Donte[/quote]
I would agree with that. Unless Henderson or Stallworth is [B]really[/B] good, I doubt they'll be on the roster for opening day. I bet they give the UDFAs an early advantage simply for being much younger and having more potential. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Lotus;1011890]Since 2009 Henderson has not had more than 35 catches, 500 yards, or 2 TD's in a single year. What about those numbers indicates "ready to bust out" rather than "ready to guard the gatorade"?
Well since he hasn't yet, now would be a good time to do just that. If he had already then I couldn't say ready to bust out. I don't think he was hired to guard the gatorade. Seriously? I actually said he may be ready to bust out. Why are you replying in that chitty way? Trying to get something started? I'm game. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1011866]Wow Goodell steps up for the Redskins:
[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2013/06/12/roger-goodell-defends-redskins-nickname-in-a-letter-to-congress/]Roger Goodell defends Redskins nickname in a letter to Congress[/url][/quote] I don't see how calling indians redskins means that you hate them or is some kind of racial slur. But i am not an Indian and their take is what is the meaningful take. But I know for a fact that when I say I love the REDSKINS I don't think about hating on Indians or have any less respect for them. Neither does anyone else i'm guessing. I think that matters as well. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Sonny9TD;1011904]Well since he hasn't yet, now would be a good time to do just that. If he had already then I couldn't say ready to bust out. I don't think he was hired to guard the gatorade. Seriously? Time will tell though. We'll talk after it is determined for who was right and who wasn't.[/quote]
Cheers! [IMG]http://www.gerberjuice.com/media_en_uk/transfer/img/sunny_d_tangy_florida_logo.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
It'd be great to see Stallworth/Henderson NOT make the final roster, as an indication of the talent and depth already there. That said, consistency (of one type or another) is an issue with each guy: Garcon (injury questions and just looking at his historical production); Morgan (not much there); Hank (hands, waiting on a breakout season); Moss (still probably the most talented/consistent WR on the roster but not a #1).
So, it's like we're searching for more rotation guys. Maybe Henderson has something worthwhile left in the tank. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=mredskins;1011907]Cheers!
[IMG]http://www.gerberjuice.com/media_en_uk/transfer/img/sunny_d_tangy_florida_logo.jpg[/IMG][/quote] You know if Sonny hadn't ruptured his Achilles tendon we could have won the Super Bowl that year Billy took over. Since we are all excited about Sonny. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=RGIII;1011870]Skins don't need help at the WR position. These two guys have been brought in to get familiar with the offense and be on standby (as FAs because they won't make the cut) if a guy or two goes down.[/quote]
Glad to know that. I see you talked to Shanahan already and know why it was done. Good job. You should tell some others they won't be battling for the 6th WR or make the team since they won't make the cut. Hoping you're right and we are just fine at WR though. I actually like the receivers we have if they will be consistent. I think they have the talent and Stallworth is a veteran presence. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Sonny9TD;1011913]Glad to know that. [B]I see you talked to Shanahan already and know why it was done. Good job.[/B] You should tell some others they won't be battling for the 6th WR or make the team since they won't make the cut. Hoping you're right and we are just fine at WR though. I actually like the receivers we have if they will be consistent. I think they have the talent and Stallworth is a veteran presence.[/quote]
Chill out a little. Everyone who gets a shot is auditioning for slots on other teams as well. These moves will push the young guys and we know how Shanny is bout receivers, as many in camp as possible. |
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
[quote=Chico23231;1011917]Chill out a little. Everyone who gets a shot is auditioning for slots on other teams as well. These moves will push the young guys and we know how Shanny is bout receivers, as many in camp as possible.[/quote]
I believe I said this was a good move initially and that Stallworth was a veteran presence. He was stating a declarative that me saying this was a good move to have them come in was wrong and we needed no help. How does he know we need no help? Sounds like he was just trying to be chitty actually. I will respond in kind. I don't come here and disagree with people and have an attitude. I only respond that way to those who do it to me. Manners go a long way. He knows how he meant it. He didn't tell anyone else that who liked the move. Maybe it was a bad idea bringing them on but that isn't why he said it.. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.