Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=54018)

SmootSmack 08-29-2013 10:36 AM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
He looked at all the starters and ranked them, and then the backups and ranked them. And, as mentioned, imagined if Morris wasn't in Shanahan's system. I actually don't totally mind him underestimating Morris. But I think he's really undervaluing Helu, who had a pretty strong season back in 2011. For that matter he's even undervaluing Royster. And I'm not a fan of him ranking guys who haven't taken a snap (like Christine Michael) above Helu.

But whatever it's his opinion.

Skins4L 08-29-2013 10:42 AM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
this list is a joke we all do realize that right. Mo and his thunderous 1600 well earnt yards aren't enough to crack the top 10 I guess lol. Helu is super slept on. We he got his chance a couple back he looked very good at times as rookie despite running behind an OL that was playing NOwhere close to how we play now.

skinsfan69 08-29-2013 11:20 AM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
Morris gets no respect. I don't care what system he's in. 1,600 yards is 1,600 yards. Also didn't he lead in league in yards after contact?

SirLK26 08-29-2013 02:28 PM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
[quote=Chico23231;1021131]Sportsillustrated QB rankings:

30. Radiers
31. Jacksonville
32. Washington Redskins 1. RG3 2. KC 3. RG1
"RG3- Scheme inflated numbers, dont like his haircut, injured knee, problems with the coaching staff, works too hard. KC-Looks more like peter pan than a QB, too positive and professional, cornball QB, bad draft choice aftering drafting RG3 same draft. RG1-shoulda lost his job to P-Dub in the preaseason, too fat, washed up, showed he couldnt lead TD drive after TD drive in the preaseason because that was just luck."[/quote]

I like this. :lol:

Honestly, this list is beyond stupid. How can you rank the top rushing attack, a 1,600 yard running back, and a top-tier fullback, as one of the worst backfields in the NFL? But hey, whatever. These rankings don't reflect the talent of our backfield, they're just someone's obtuse view of reality.

Evilgrin 08-29-2013 02:35 PM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
Its a list designed to get alot of attention. Hopefully it motivates our middle of the pack offense:)

That Guy 08-29-2013 05:18 PM

Re: Sports Illustrated NFL Backfield Rankings
 
alfmo finished #3 in the rookie of the year vote, so he has to have some talent, right?

whatever, i'm done. I completely disagree with the ranking though.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.15251 seconds with 9 queries