Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=Lotus;1107945]It's a half-contract. Players have to live by it...clubs don't.[/quote]Fat Albert Haynesworth didn't. Though guess a player better get paid beforehand.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

Really wonder if RGIII was named the starter sooner rather than take their time, meaning the coaches, as this could be a last ditch effort?

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

I'm surprised really that there is this much discussion over this subject.

Maybe i am insane, or jaded, or both, but i really truly feel it is a matter of Dan Snyder preferred RG3 to be his QB, no matter what. And so to accomplish this goal he made sure he brought in people / got other people on board with the decision. I believe Gruden was told straight up for him to get year 2, he had to accept that RG3 was the starter no matter what. Other coaches who were brought in were probably told the same. If they disagreed on personnel, they would have likely not been hired.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1108127]I'm surprised really that there is this much discussion over this subject.

Maybe i am insane, or jaded, or both, but i really truly feel it is a matter of Dan Snyder preferred RG3 to be his QB, no matter what. And so to accomplish this goal he made sure he brought in people / got other people on board with the decision. I believe Gruden was told straight up for him to get year 2, he had to accept that RG3 was the starter no matter what. Other coaches who were brought in were probably told the same. If they disagreed on personnel, they would have likely not been hired.[/quote]

What you say is not outside the realm of possibility, IMO. Nevertheless, RGIII still needs to perform well on the field to keep the job. Dan Snyder won't save him if he continues to play poorly.

Since we're rebuilding, I can wait out the QB decision.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1108131]What you say is not outside the realm of possibility, IMO. Nevertheless, RGIII still needs to perform well on the field to keep the job. Dan Snyder won't save him if he continues to play poorly.

Since we're rebuilding, I can wait out the QB decision.[/quote]

I think i disagree with the RG3 needs to play well part. I think if Dan is convinced that RG3 should be the guy, then there is no stopping him. Who is going to change his mind?

Rebuilding is a term that we use to loosely here. Our problem was, is, and will always be, we have one guy (Mr. Snyder) who believes that he "knows" players, and "knows" the game of football well enough that he can make all these decisions himself. Dan doesn't know either of these things. I still do not understand why he has hired a GM when everybody knows that DS is always going to make the final call.

Here is a conversation that will NEVER take place at Redskins Park:

Coach / GM, etc: "Mr. Snyder, we understand that you want RG3 to be our unquestioned starter, but all of us have reviewed game film, spoken with other scouts, talent evaluators, coaches, etc.. and the general consensus here and among the NFL is that RG3 can't play the position well enough to get wins. Continuing to play him is setting back this team and hurting the growth of other positions that rely on good QB play."

Dan Snyder: "Well, i guess you're right, it looks like i was mistaken in my evaluation of RG3. Thanks for explaining. We need to put the BEST players on the field in order to have the best chance of winning"

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

It will play out on the field. If Griffin isn't the best guy he won't be on the field.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

Last year Griffin was healthy and on the bench for multiple games. If Snyder is really so set on Griffin starting, why wouldn't he have fired Gruden at the end of the season?

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1108134]It will play out on the field. If Griffin isn't the best guy he won't be on the field.[/quote]
Search your paranoid, conspiratorial mindset....Luke. Dan is your father and will continue to bring the Dark Times to the Burgundy and Gold.......

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=SirLK26;1108137]Last year Griffin was healthy and on the bench for multiple games. If Snyder is really so set on Griffin starting, why wouldn't he have fired Gruden at the end of the season?[/quote]

Because he is probably not so set on Griffin as people make it out to be. I'm sure there is some truth about the rumors, but I'm sure all of it is not.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1108134]It will play out on the field. If Griffin isn't the best guy he won't be on the field.[/quote]

Agreed upon.....RG3 needs to play up to par if he's to remain the starting quarterback of the Washington Redskins.....Gruden won't hesitate to pull him again if Griffin plays poorly....

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

because he IS the starter. lol. you all better be routing for RG dude you really might as well. Were not gonna draft anyone there this year. Terrible FA QB Group.

Griffins the guy sorry to burst your bubble.

Fix the damn Oline so the kid can make reads. Watch Tom Brady, dude sits back there and eats chips, then throws it.

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

While the online has its issues, let's not be blind about this. RGIII was sacked at twice the rate of Cousins or McCoy. He bears a significant portion of any blame In that regard.

Reads and time were there often enough, he just couldn't make them.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[QUOTE=JoeRedskin;1108557]While the online has its issues, let's not be blind about this. RGIII was sacked at twice the rate of Cousins or McCoy. He bears a significant portion of any blame In that regard.

Reads and time were there often enough, he just couldn't make them.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
His sack rate was higher and he missed reads, but he rarely had a clean pocket to throw from. I still think a RT that actually can pass protect would give Griffin the extra second he needs to improve the rest of his game by taking the scramble option out of his immediate thoughts

Re: Why name RG3 the starter this soon?
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;1108557]While the online has its issues, let's not be blind about this. RGIII was sacked at twice the rate of Cousins or McCoy. He bears a significant portion of any blame In that regard.

Reads and time were there often enough, he just couldn't make them.

Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk[/quote]

I still dont understand how people missed the Olines affect on KC. Look at the Giants game. He got hammered hard in the first half and came out in the second half and just threw as soon as he could regardless of whether the receiver was open. Thats why he had 4 ints in the second half of that game. You also should have seen it with McCoy. He would rarely try to go downfield. He was getting rid of it as fast as possible knowing that he had to. RG3 was missing reads and looking to run way to early and KC and McCoy just ignored their reads and threw it asap to get it out of their hands.