Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you.

And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that.

I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off.

When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy.

We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

and where were you the last 6 months?

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=Monksdown]I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you.

And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that.

I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off.

When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy.

We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.[/QUOTE]

I completely agree with this Brunell should be our starter for 2006, Brunell should be even better with a legitimate #2 receiver, I think Brunell gives us the best shot at a SB next year. As for Campbell I believe that he will be a great player in the future for us but as for next year Brunell should start and Campbell should wait another year.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?!?!?!?!?!

brunell has taken us far, i cant deny he has made a huge impact taking us to the 2nd round of the playoffs, but did u see his performance in the playoffs? not to mention the O-line wont block for him and brunell simply is not an out of the pocket QB. jason campbell is young and quick. he will make big plays. i see brunell backing him up in the near future.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=Gibbs is God]WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?!?!?!?!?!

brunell has taken us far, i cant deny he has made a huge impact taking us to the 2nd round of the playoffs, but did u see his performance in the playoffs? not to mention the O-line wont block for him and brunell simply is not an out of the pocket QB. jason campbell is young and quick. he will make big plays. i see brunell backing him up in the near future.[/QUOTE]i think im the victim of identity theft

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

I voted Campbell, but I just want to be in the playoffs again, whoever can get us there. Coach Gibbs will make the right decision. Campbell may still be a year away.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]I voted for Campbell, not because I think Brunell is bad, but because it's time to start working on the future. If Saunders can run some plays that rejuvenate Brunell, then that's great, but as of now, I just feel that Brunell doesn't look to the open receiver.

Do I think we can win with him? Yes.

I also think we can win with Jason Campbell if anything that the coaching staff has said so far is accurate.[/QUOTE]


He doesn't look to the third option, why? Because that takes a little longer which means your going to probably get hit and Brunell at his age no longer can take the hit, that was the knock on him when we traded for him around the NFL, they felt he was no longer was willing to hold the ball because he was afraid to be hit.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

Why is Patrick Ramsey not getting a chance? I know he's a dumb redneck, but he showed savvy with Spurrier, and we should work on him.. we should have Ramsey and Campbell play out practice to be number 2, and whoever shines through, thats who we should put the job of a long term answer on.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=Gibbs is God]WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?!?!?!?!?!

brunell has taken us far, i cant deny he has made a huge impact taking us to the 2nd round of the playoffs, but did u see his performance in the playoffs? not to mention the O-line wont block for him and brunell simply is not an out of the pocket QB. jason campbell is young and quick. he will make big plays. i see brunell backing him up in the near future.[/QUOTE]


You are an idiot, and this post really reflects your age, kid. Mark Brunell is/was a great scrambling QB. Not an out of pocket QB? He might not be fast like he used to be, but you obviously know nothing about Mark Brunell.

The o-line isn't blocking because half of them are frigging hurt. Jason Campbell is going to make big plays? No. He's a rookie. He'll have the occasional long pass play to a WIDE open Moss, but he needs another year. He's a daisy fresh baby.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=CooleyFan]Why is Patrick Ramsey not getting a chance? I know he's a dumb redneck, but he showed savvy with Spurrier, and we should work on him.. we should have Ramsey and Campbell play out practice to be number 2, and whoever shines through, thats who we should put the job of a long term answer on.[/QUOTE]
1. He makes bad decisions.
2. He holds on to the ball too long.
3. When he's hit, he fumbles, a lot.
4. His leadership skills (allegedly) are lacking.
5. He doesn't have the 'it factor' that successful NFL QB have.
6. and most importantly, the coaching staff doesn't trust him.

He's gone, deal with it.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

Let's chill with the name calling, if you can't discuss things in an adult manner you'll be taking a break.

thanks

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

Okay, Okay, now I'm convinced we don't need to add Ramsey to this poll ..:)


[i]Gibbs called quarterbacks Mark Brunell and Jason Campbell to inform them of Saunders's hiring but said he has not talked to Patrick Ramsey, who almost certainly will be traded or released.[/i]

[url="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/23/AR2006012301197.html"]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/23/AR2006012301197.html[/url]

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

[QUOTE=CooleyFan]Why is Patrick Ramsey not getting a chance? I know he's a dumb redneck, but he showed savvy with Spurrier, and we should work on him.. we should have Ramsey and Campbell play out practice to be number 2, and whoever shines through, thats who we should put the job of a long term answer on.[/QUOTE]

Did anyone else see Peyton's feet jumping up and down in his "one" playoff game this year. He reminded me of Patrick. The following is a dialogue actually removed from Patrick's mind last year.

"Oh god, Oh god, Oh god, Oh god" I could read his mind by looking at his cha cha 'ing feet.

So what he is tough, he's also perpetually scared.

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

Matty,

you are a wimp. :)

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

who the hell cares? Ramsey was are starter on opening day, for about ten minutes!

Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006?
 

I think Brunell has earned the right to start again next season - he did get us to our first playoff games in 6 years. Last time we tried to upgrade at QB to get to the Super Bowl, we made a huge mistake. Anyone want to see Jeff George Part Deux?

But, ultimately, I will trust in whatever Gibbs decides. I ate a lot of crow after thinking Gibbs had lost his mind when he put Brunell in last September. I don't want to make that mistake again.