Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Russell to the skins? (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=17462)

That Guy 03-15-2007 02:39 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[URL="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2007/03/the_jamarcus_rumors_are_bogust.html"]The Jamarcus Rumors Are Bogus/Todd Wade To Sign Today - Redskins Insider[/URL]

JR's agents are telling everyone they can that dan wants to pay him big bucks... it's just another agent with another stupid ploy to get more money.

SkinsFanSince91 03-15-2007 03:03 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
if this goes down then we will go down as the "madden" franchise of the NFL

rvd420 03-15-2007 04:01 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
there's no way we are getting either quin or russell.we have campbell.its crap spread by their agents to get more money for their players.
on a different note we should trade aa for bly and springs for draft picks.
we also need to boot old brunells ass out the door.
Oh yea and one other thing.HAIL SKINS 4 LIFE!!!!!!!

That Guy 03-15-2007 05:36 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
wtf is going to take AA for bly? that'll NEVER happen.

chrisl4064 03-15-2007 05:40 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
i hope we get him. then maybe i can get better seats next year.

phathom 03-15-2007 05:46 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
We need Dre Bly more than anything else so we need to try to focus on that trade. If we trade down we can get some good role players and probably a really good Guard.

phathom 03-15-2007 05:46 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
We need Dre Bly more than anything else so we need to try to focus on that trade. If we trade down we can get some good role players and probably a really good Guard.

skinsfan_nn 03-15-2007 05:47 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
The title of this thread should be the dumbest thread ever....LOL
It aint happin! That's right I'm sayin NEVER! I usually don't use that kinda language.

rvd420 03-15-2007 06:28 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
aa for bly could happen.

Redskins_P 03-15-2007 07:21 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE=rvd420;288226]aa for bly could happen.[/QUOTE]

No way. No one will touch AA's contract.

rvd420 03-15-2007 08:15 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
just like no one would give dockery a ludicrous contract!thats proof that aa for bly could happen.

B.F. SKINner 03-15-2007 08:19 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE]
If we do this, I'm done. I'll start spending my time concentrating on my actual life and getting a job.
[/QUOTE]

:) That's funny as hell. Thanks for the laugh.

rvd420 03-15-2007 08:23 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
its true if the bills will pay that much for dock who aint worth it then aa for bly makes sense.

GMScud 03-15-2007 08:49 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=rvd420;288254]its true if the bills will pay that much for dock who aint worth it then aa for bly makes sense.[/quote]

The Broncos would want a lot more than just AA for Dre Bly. We'd have to part with something else, be it draft picks or another player.

On a side note that's great news about Wade. And again, we didn't rush to give him a big contract right at the onset of FA, and now we bag him for only $3.5M? I like our patience. Finally.

rvd420 03-15-2007 08:52 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
:headbange hell yea.hopefully weve learned our lesson.aa and one of our recievers like espy for bly would work.

GMScud 03-15-2007 08:58 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=rvd420;288269]:headbange hell yea.hopefully weve learned our lesson.aa and one of our recievers like espy for bly would work.[/quote]

Probably have to be someone better than Espy. He is on the very fringes of the roster.

rvd420 03-15-2007 09:02 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
hes better than patten.

GMScud 03-15-2007 09:11 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
That's kind of to be determined. Espy hasn't seen the field other than the preseason. Patten has obviously been a complete bust.

rvd420 03-15-2007 09:13 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
espy was on the field during last season.

dall-assblows 03-15-2007 10:34 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
guys guys guys calm down and consider the source. they say whatever they want. they could say the sky is red and grass is pink and people on this site (not naming any names) would be like "is this possible, i think there is a chance this is the real deal"

FRPLG 03-15-2007 11:01 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE=PorterHouse;288146]Yeah me and yo momma.[/QUOTE]

Are you 9?

Luxorreb 03-15-2007 11:19 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
An unprepared team is a losing team.

Makes sense now to know about possible trade scenarios and players and if Russell is available at #6 someone will trade us for that pick. How much? Probably a decent amount.

I might change my tune if the Skins actually sign him, but working him out is really not a big deal...

100% PURE WHOOP ASS 03-16-2007 01:22 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=Gmanc711;287997]If we do this, I'm done. I'll start spending my time concentrating on my actual life and getting a job.[/quote]

thats a plan?

100% PURE WHOOP ASS 03-16-2007 01:27 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;288035]The only way I could support us drafting Russell is [B][I]IF[/I][/B] he somehow drops all the way down to us at the #6. The guy looks like he's going to be a beast, but we've already given up so much to get Campbell that I would be shocked if we dumped him after half a season of actually playing for another new kid.

Really though, I don't put much stock into this right now.[/quote]

heres an idea, trade portis to 3rd spot move up above the hated Buc's take calvin johnson, then with our 6 pick, we take adrian peterson, that would be worth it, plus can you imagine the look on grudens face........ priceless

offiss 03-16-2007 03:59 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE=100% PURE WHOOP ASS;288347]heres an idea, trade portis to 3rd spot move up above the hated Buc's take calvin johnson, then with our 6 pick, we take adrian peterson, that would be worth it, plus can you imagine the look on grudens face........ priceless[/QUOTE]

Why would the Browns trade for Portis when they can get a better, younger, cheaper back in Peterson? The only team dumb enough to fall for a trade like that is us.

dmek25 03-16-2007 05:06 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=100% PURE WHOOP ASS;288347]heres an idea, trade portis to 3rd spot move up above the hated Buc's take calvin johnson, then with our 6 pick, we take adrian peterson, that would be worth it, plus can you imagine the look on grudens face........ priceless[/quote]
just what we should do, take 2 players we dont need :(

That Guy 03-16-2007 06:17 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
aa and espy for bly? jeez, its NOT ever going to happen... maybe you guys are idding (i hope so) but if not, be aware that the broncos are very very close to the cap and arch's contract is very unfriendly after this year, plus they don't need him, cause he's injury prone or he just flat out sucks, your call.

think about it, a #1 corner for a punt protector? no one's that stupid.

Pocket$ $traight 03-16-2007 06:18 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
JLC killed it in his blog and speculated that Gibbs may even kill it publicly.

This is a rumor started by Russell's agents to boost his value.

Schneed10 03-16-2007 08:54 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
It's one thing for the national media to get all caught up in this Jamarcus Russell rumor, they don't cover our team all that closely and don't know exactly how much everyone in-house loves Jason Campbell. But it's an entirely different thing for REDSKIN FANS to actually buy into this rumor, especially Redskin fans on this site. As a fan base, we are supposed to be smarter than other fan bases around the league. And specifically at the Warpath, we are supposed to be smarter than fans at other Redskin sites. This is where we come to have KNOWLEDGABLE discussion about the Redskins. But buying into a rumor like this just shows how little you know.

If you bought into it, consider yourself scolded.

[url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/]Redskins Insider[/url]

12thMan 03-16-2007 09:13 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=Schneed10;288418]It's one thing for the national media to get all caught up in this Jamarcus Russell rumor, they don't cover our team all that closely and don't know exactly how much everyone in-house loves Jason Campbell. But it's an entirely different thing for REDSKIN FANS to actually buy into this rumor, especially Redskin fans on this site. As a fan base, we are supposed to be smarter than other fan bases around the league. And specifically at the Warpath, we are supposed to be smarter than fans at other Redskin sites. This is where we come to have KNOWLEDGABLE discussion about the Redskins. But buying into a rumor like this just shows how little you know.

If you bought into it, consider yourself scolded.

[URL="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/"]Redskins Insider[/URL][/quote]

Good post. It really amazes me how, at times, we're no different from the people that don't follow the team or have the insight we're privy to. No way in hell the Redskins could possibly show one iota of interest in Russell. To be truthful, you shouldn't have to read a JLC blogg or anything to really come to the conclusion. I'm actually surprised that this particular thread has last, what, this many pages. But I guess it really is off season.

rvd420 03-16-2007 02:18 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
:Flush: whoever thinks we are getting russell needs to stop smoking meth cause it aint happenin.

rvd420 03-16-2007 02:22 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
:smashfrea we are not trading portis and we do need a tall reciever but it will be in the later rounds if we do.

Southpaw 03-16-2007 02:31 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=Schneed10;288418]And specifically at the Warpath, we are supposed to be smarter than fans at other Redskin sites. This is where we come to have KNOWLEDGABLE discussion about the Redskins.[/quote]


.... :rofl: :laughing2

100% PURE WHOOP ASS 03-16-2007 04:49 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=dmek25;288362]just what we should do, take 2 players we dont need :([/quote]

2 players we dont need....are you serious, outside of moss/ Lioyd and randell at best is poor 2nd and 3rd receivers, antwann a great returned, but Calvin Johnson is a beast a freak of nature, and adrian peterson, is probably going to be a stud in 2 yrs, we still have Betts, and Jason Campbell will have a speedster and big target to through to, which means betts and peterson, will keep the 8 man from honest.....I LOVE PORTIS, THINK HES GREAT, but how much longer you think he will hold up, i hope forever but last year is a bad sign,........but sorr dmek25, i guess your opinion is the only one that counts

rvd420 03-16-2007 08:21 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
:smashfrea were more than likely trading down.we have more than one need.portis gets hurt one year and everybody thinks hes done.how sad.
portis is goin no where.

holcknowsbest 03-16-2007 11:52 PM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
wait wait, we werent there looking at russell, we are there looking at laron laundry. the falcons love this guy and they are at 10, if we show intrest in laundry then that gives us another potential trade partner. its all gamesmanship by gibbs and company......why would we want russell when we already have a guy with the same style and skills as him. its a joke so calm down fokes.

Crazyhorse1 03-17-2007 12:43 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=Redskins_P;288236]No way. No one will touch AA's contract.[/quote]

I'm hoping we can trade AA for Bly and that JaMarcus with fall to us at #6. After that, I'd like to pick up Gaines Adams in the third and Okoye in the fourth. Maybe we can pick up Calvin Johnson after that but think we might have to settle for Branch.

jsarno 03-17-2007 01:02 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE=Crazyhorse1;288627]I'm hoping we can trade AA for Bly and that JaMarcus with fall to us at #6. After that, I'd like to pick up Gaines Adams in the third and Okoye in the fourth. Maybe we can pick up Calvin Johnson after that but think we might have to settle for Branch.[/QUOTE]

WHAT??? Adams in the 3rd??? You mean 3rd pick overall right? Cause he's a top 10 prospect. This post makes absolutely no sense...come to think of it, why am I even bother to make a reply on a pipe dream? Shame on me.

dmek25 03-17-2007 05:10 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[quote=100% PURE WHOOP ASS;288551]2 players we dont need....are you serious, outside of moss/ Lioyd and randell at best is poor 2nd and 3rd receivers, antwann a great returned, but Calvin Johnson is a beast a freak of nature, and adrian peterson, is probably going to be a stud in 2 yrs, we still have Betts, and Jason Campbell will have a speedster and big target to through to, which means betts and peterson, will keep the 8 man from honest.....I LOVE PORTIS, THINK HES GREAT, but how much longer you think he will hold up, i hope forever but last year is a bad sign,........but sorr dmek25, i guess your opinion is the only one that counts[/quote]
first off, I'm not trying to say my opinion is right, I'm am just stating it. and secondly, all 3 of those receivers are proven NFL players. we do not need another reciever. and if you watched the redskins last season, ladell betts is a fine BACK UP. i don't think any of us want our main ball carrier to fumble as much, especially in crucial times, as betts as shown a tendency to. and if we do what you want, who the hell is playing defense? i for one do not want the same cast as we had on the field last year. we already proved that doesn't work

JoeRedskin 03-17-2007 10:13 AM

Re: Russell to the skins?
 
[QUOTE=rvd420]aa for bly could happen. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=rvd420]just like no one would give dockery a ludicrous contract!thats proof that aa for bly could happen.[/QUOTE]

So, an unrelated transaction in which a team needing O-Line help, paid an exhorbitant amount for one of the top 3 guards on the market in a market flush with new money, IS ABSOLUTE PROOFthat a team with a hard hitting safety that is a liability in coverage (John Lynch anyone), having just traded 2 starters and a fifth round choice for a top-flight CB, will turn around and trade that CB for a third string safety that everyone acknowledges is a liability in coverage.

Why yes, the logic of your statement is irrefutable. The sun comes up every morning PROVES that cows give milk.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.17210 seconds with 9 queries