|
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=skinsfaninok;567437]" As far as being a top 10 QB, I could probably name 15 that I would rather in a playoff game at this point in time.[/quote] "
Name those 15 my man because I say he is a top 7 QB in the league. 1.Brady 2. Manning 3. Brees 4. Rivers 5. Mcnabb 6. BIG BEN 7. ROMO 8. WARNER 9. E.MANNING 10. CUTLER[/quote] You are letting regular season stats skew your ratings. I am not talking about a fantasy league, I am talking about a playoff game. Read what you are responding to. In no particular order... Brady P Manning E Manning Big Ben K Warner J Delhomme D McNabb B Favre P Rivers C Pennington J Garcia Carson Palmer M Hasselbeck David Garrard Drew Brees Kerry Collins Joe Flacco Every one of these guys have proved that they won't throw up all over themselves every time it is a game that counts. All Romo has done is proven that he will find ways to lose. He would probably have a few wins by now if he had just managed a couple of games or held on to a field goal snap. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=skinsfaninok;567437]" As far as being a top 10 QB, I could probably name 15 that I would rather in a playoff game at this point in time.[/quote] "
Name those 15 my man because I say he is a top 7 QB in the league. 1.Brady 2. Manning 3. Brees 4. Rivers 5. Mcnabb 6. BIG BEN 7. ROMO 8. WARNER 9. E.MANNING 10. CUTLER[/QUOTE] Id put Superbowl Winners Warner and Eli Manning easily over Romo. Romo and Cutler look better next to one another 9 and 10. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Chico23231;567479]"
Name those 15 my man because I say he is a top 7 QB in the league. 1.Brady 2. Manning 3. Brees 4. Rivers 5. Mcnabb 6. BIG BEN 7. ROMO 8. WARNER 9. E.MANNING 10. CUTLER[/quote] Id put Superbowl Winners Warner and Eli Manning easily over Romo. Romo and Cutler look better next to one another 9 and 10.[/quote] Almost same list different order..................... 1.Brady 2. Manning 3. Big Benn 4. Warner 5. Eli 6. McNabb 7.Hasselbeck 8. Brees 9. Rivers 10.Cutler [/quote] |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=sandtrapjack;567475]What you say is true.
But they still are the top team in playoff history at: .[/quote] No ,not really.NFL has been around along time,count the the teams and game since it started in 1927,not just since the super bowl was formed.:spank: |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Giantone;567499]No ,not really.NFL has been around along time,count the the teams and game since it started in 1927,not just since the super bowl was formed.:spank:[/quote]
Yes and no. By doing that you discount half the league. The NFL did not REALLY come into being until the merger. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
Jacobs done won a super bowl, Romo never won a playoff game. This means Jacobs 1, Romo 0.
|
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=sandtrapjack;567516]Yes and no. By doing that you discount half the league.[/quote]
So , do you mean we start over every time a new team comes in?The NFL has been around since 1927...teams have come and gone but the league started in 1927 and that is when the records started. So ...ahhhhhhh no. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Giantone;567532]So , do you mean we start over every time a new team comes in?The NFL has been around since 1927...teams have come and gone but the league started in 1927 and that is when the records started. So ...ahhhhhhh no.[/quote]
Don't over think it. By simply recognizing NFL Championships and disregarding AFL Championships, 10 AFL teams are neglected from the discussion. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;567478]
In no particular order... Brady P Manning E Manning Big Ben K Warner J Delhomme D McNabb B Favre P Rivers C Pennington J Garcia Carson Palmer M Hasselbeck David Garrard Drew Brees Kerry Collins Joe Flacco [/quote] Brady for sure P Manning for sure E Manning maybe Big Ben yes K Warner yes J Delhomme maybe D McNabb yes B Favre NO.....older version of Romo P Rivers yes C Pennington NO.....choker J Garcia hmmm...maybe Carson Palmer maybe M Hasselbeck maybe David Garrard NO......your reaching now Drew Brees for sure Kerry Collins hmmm...maybe Joe Flacco ROFL...NO...maybe in a year or two And we are only talking about ONE game, otherwise Romo would have to move higher. I hate Dallas as much as anyone, and I still say Romo is overrated. But when you make the list, he has to make the top 15. Id put him somewhere around 10, but talking heads like to put him up there with Brady/Manning. This whole list might look alot different following the 2009-10 season. BTW....Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan, Matt Cassel, Jay Cutler. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=sandtrapjack;567534]Don't over think it. By simply recognizing NFL Championships and disregarding AFL Championships, 10 AFL teams are neglected from the discussion.[/quote]
Were they in the NFL,no,see not that hard to figure out.We are talking about the NFL,what happen before that team joined the NFL does not matter. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;567478]"
In no particular order... Brady P Manning E Manning Big Ben K Warner J Delhomme D McNabb B Favre P Rivers C Pennington J Garcia Carson Palmer M Hasselbeck David Garrard Drew Brees Kerry Collins Joe Flacco Every one of these guys have proved that they won't throw up all over themselves every time it is a game that counts. All Romo has done is proven that he will find ways to lose. He would probably have a few wins by now if he had just managed a couple of games or held on to a field goal snap.[/quote] lol you are crazy dude that's just hating on romo. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Giantone;567538]Were they in the NFL,no,see not that hard to figure out.We are talking about the NFL,what happen before that team joined the NFL does not matter.[/quote]
The original post mentioned that if the Cowboys loose a playoff game this year then they will have the most CONSECUTIVE playoff losses in history. And that stat if from the post merger Super Bowl era, not the pre-merger, not the pre-Super Bowl and not in 1927. Hence why I say Dont over-think it. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
TheWarpath.net...a place where Cowboy fans and Giants fans can bicker with each other
|
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=smootsmack;567554]thewarpath.net...a place where cowboy fans and giants fans can bicker with each other[/quote]
lol no joke!!! |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
I did not really care or have an opinion on this whole Tony Romo thing.
However, after seeing the the Eagles vs Cowboys game Dec. 28 2008 on NFL Network this weekend...Tony Romo was terrible. He was not just bad, he was awful. He looked uncomfortable and out of sorts. I forget how bad Romo finished the year. Then the NFL Network went on to point out that Romo is 5-8 in December for his career. The Cowboys are one of the most a talented teams in the NFL. This is not the Cleveland Browns we are talking about. Some of the blame has to land on Romo. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
Romo is totally [url=http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20290944,00.html]focused[/url] now.
|
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=SmootSmack;567564]Romo is totally [URL="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20290944,00.html"]focused[/URL] now.[/quote]
this should get it's own thread. lol. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=SmootSmack;567564]Romo is totally [URL="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20290944,00.html"]focused[/URL] now.[/quote]
He said he dumped her. Yeah bull, they always say that... |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=SmootSmack;567554]TheWarpath.net...a place where Cowboy fans and Giants fans can bicker with each other[/quote]
LOL, yeah..."Where the possesed go to mingle!" |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=sandtrapjack;567548]The original post mentioned that if the Cowboys loose a playoff game this year then they will have the most CONSECUTIVE playoff losses in history. And that stat if from the post merger Super Bowl era, not the pre-merger, not the pre-Super Bowl [/quote]
If????.................and how do you know it doesn't mean the history of the NFL? |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=SmootSmack;567554]TheWarpath.net...a place where Cowboy fans and Giants fans can bicker with each other[/quote]
....................:boxing:,:food-smil |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;567478]"
Name those 15 my man because I say he is a top 7 QB in the league. 1.Brady 2. Manning 3. Brees 4. Rivers 5. Mcnabb 6. BIG BEN 7. ROMO 8. WARNER 9. E.MANNING 10. CUTLER[/quote] You are letting regular season stats skew your ratings. I am not talking about a fantasy league, I am talking about a playoff game. Read what you are responding to. In no particular order... Brady P Manning E Manning Big Ben K Warner J Delhomme D McNabb B Favre P Rivers C Pennington J Garcia Carson Palmer M Hasselbeck David Garrard Drew Brees Kerry Collins Joe Flacco Every one of these guys have proved that they won't throw up all over themselves every time it is a game that counts. .[/quote] ....well, minus McNabb.:vomit::laughing2 |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Giantone;567585]If????.................and how do you know it doesn't mean the history of the NFL?[/quote]
That is a`pre-Super Bowl era record. By the way, the Giants are currently tied for the record, but do not have a current streak, unlike the Cowboys. See here: [url=http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/records/playoffs/team/games]Super Bowl 43[/url] |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=hooskins;567579]He said he dumped her. [B]Yeah bull, they always say that[/B]...[/quote]
You know, I actually believe him. The fact of the matter is that she had a hell of a lot more riding on that relationship's existence than he did, simply because it helped her stay relevant. She doesn't exactly have much of a singing or acting career left to turn to. Really, as crude as it sounds, her options for remaining newsworthy at this point are pretty much limited to engaging in a Britney-like self-destructive streak or posing nude. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=skinsfaninok;567546]lol you are crazy dude that's just hating on romo.[/quote]
Ok. I am just hating... So why does he have more muffed snaps for playoff losses than playoff wins? Why did he throw an INT to lose to the Giants with home field advantage? Why did he piss himself against the Eagles last year? Why is he absolutely pathetic in December when wins are most important? Maybe you need to quit buying the hype and realize that he is eye candy. You cannot objectively look past his great fantasy stats (which will go down this year btw because Owens is gone) and admit that he is a choker. Maybe you want to back a choker, however I will give accolades to those who overachieve when it counts instead of embarrassing one of the most talented teams year in and year out. How about this, since you view this proven choker, for whatever reason, as a top 7 QB give your analysis of how he fits that criteria? |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=SmootSmack;567564]Romo is totally [URL="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20290944,00.html"]focused[/URL] now.[/quote]
All I know is we need to send a [B]"No Trespass Letter"[/B] to his ex to keep her away from any Skins players. The first thing women do is go out and do the first thing they can think of that would piss you off. The last thing we need is her shaking her booty around the park distracting everyone. LOL. |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;567624]Ok. I am just hating... So why does he have more muffed snaps for playoff losses than playoff wins? Why did he throw an INT to lose to the Giants with home field advantage? Why did he piss himself against the Eagles last year? Why is he absolutely pathetic in December when wins are most important?
Maybe you need to quit buying the hype and realize that he is eye candy. You cannot objectively look past his great fantasy stats (which will go down this year btw because Owens is gone) and admit that he is a choker. Maybe you want to back a choker, however I will give accolades to those who overachieve when it counts instead of embarrassing one of the most talented teams year in and year out. How about this, since you view this proven choker, for whatever reason, as a top 7 QB give your analysis of how he fits that criteria?[/quote] The fumble happen's that was a coaching problem because he shouldn't have been the holder anyway.... but no excuses he can't drop it. We could all argue all day if we agree or disagree but the bottom line is SCREW DALLAS anyway and the Eagles and Giants.. I still think Romo is ahead of ELI but thats my opinion we will see soon if Romo is the real deal without T.O |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
[quote=Lotus;567589]That is a`pre-Super Bowl era record. By the way, the Giants are currently tied for the record, but do not have a current streak, unlike the Cowboys. See here:
[URL="http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/records/playoffs/team/games"]Super Bowl 43[/URL][/quote] LOL.........ya had to go and wreck the surprise.:goodjob: |
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
Romo has had a lot more to work with Okie than JC. His ass is on the line just as bad as JC's as CR has alluded to. Every preseason mag has them contending with us for the NFC East cellar so in reality most writers tend to agree with Jacobs, as do I and it seems most guys in the forum. The guy has his head up his ass, or until more recently between Jessica Simpson's thighs!!!!!!
|
Re: Romo gets dissed again.
romo sucks
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.