Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=Redpath;652536]Replace Fletcher? You serious? :([/quote]

Yes, he's probably got 1 decent year left. Even then, I would expect to see some drop off from him next season, he's played 12 years. I'm not saying cut him now, but they have to look towards replacing him, especially if the same system w/the Mike calling signals & in charge of the unit remains in place.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Also if, and I'm not sure we will, we switch to a 3-4 McLain makes sense

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Anyone wanting a running back? [URL="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=tsn-uscrunningbackjoemck&prov=tsn&type=lgns"]Joe McKnight has declared for the draft.[/URL]

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=Trample the Elderly;652447]Two of the teams that drafted these guys, one in the first and the other in the second I believe in Loadholt's case, are in the playoffs (Ravens & Vikings). Oher has played RT and LT this year. Those teams had decent lineman already. We've got a bunch of effing bums. 75% of the offensive linemen on our roster right now are going to hit the bricks as soon as Shanny starts looking at film.

I want the next Chris Samuals at LT for the next ten years, not a FA for the next year. Chris was the third pick in the first, not a deal they found in the fifth or some UDFA from Maryland. I'll eat my words if they draft some wonderboy and we go to the playoffs. I don't see that going down. I see some poor kid eating turf as the NFC East uses him like toilet paper.[/quote]

There's a middle ground between gambling on developing UDFAs and using a high draft pick on O-linemen, and that is addressing the O-line by using free agency to pick up pro o-linemen (and not necessarily "veteran" O-linemen).

You may point out that the Redskins have been burned by free agency in the past, but the problem was we were gving cushy deals to high-mileage guys. Well, this year there are some OL free agents who are young and low-mileage (from winning programs like New Orleans and New England), and we can avoid having a super-young OL and chalking 2010 up to a rebuilding year.

The 2010 schedule is too good to pass up, and the Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants are all fairly weak teams. We can always "rebuild" in 2011. By being smart, we CAN have it both ways: a young, talented team that can compete immediately.

Also: everybody please stop using the Vikings as an example for anything. They are a freak team with 3 of the best offensive weapons on the field at the same time: Peterson, Rice and Harvin.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=GTripp0012;652490]It is quite the conundrum. But, if quarterback play is still an issue that needs to be solved, you'll be around the 4-6 win mark, and be picking in the top five or so.[/quote]Let's look at our specific situation. JC is an RFA, he's tendered and sticks around. With our 4th we hit on a franchise LT, Okung, Campbell, whoever. 2nd we wind up with a solid starter at another OL spot, say C or RT. Dock stays solid. Now with the new regime in place, good-excellent coaching, a new DC who runs a better scheme we're looking at 7-9 to 9-7. While I've been down on JC's performance this year, if the new regime can do a better job covering his weaknesses and maximizing his strengths, with a better scheme and supporting cast he won't flat out blow games. We're certainly not in the 4-6 win range. Now without the franchise QB, we're back where we were under Gibbs 2004-2007, on the cusp, but can't break through.

I think Clausen is a franchise QB, (even if he looks like an emu or douche) his numbers stack up quite favorably against other franchise QBs who came out of college, he played in a pro style offense under a great offense mind in Charlie Weis.

Check out these links, pretty good stuff: Matt McGuire hits the nail on the head.

[URL="http://walterfootball.com/mattblog091229.php"]WalterFootball.com: The NFL Matt Draft - Matt McGuire's NFL Draft Blog[/URL]

[URL="http://walterfootball.com/draftmailbag2010_clausen2.php"]WalterFootball.com: 2010 NFL Draft Mailbag[/URL]

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

I think Iupati could be the Michael Oher of next year. I Love this guy, the problem is theres no reason for us to take him with the 4th overall pick, which will probably be a QB or OT. Plus in Free Agency is Guards Chester Pitts and Cris Kuper from Houston and Denver, so they already know the offense. And with our second rounder, we'll probably get whatever position we don't get with our first round pick. I personally think we should get Bradford, because all I keep hearing is how he is "super accurate" "good at getting rid of the ball and releasing it quickly" how he can "make all the NFL throws" and is "accuate when he is on the run as well". When I look at a QB the number one thing I'm looking at is is he accurate? Can he get the balls to his receivers? Thats this guy. This guy doesn't come out every year. Russell Okung and Anthony Davis type LT's come out pretty much every year. Plus you look at some of the LT's in the NFL and a lot of them are found pretty much from all the rounds of the draft. QB's that are good are typically in the first round. We've had Jason for 5 years and of the 4 he's played he really hasn't shown me he can be the QB that could take us to the Super Bowl. He's showed me that he can be a back up and fill in if the starting QB gets injured, but thats it. I have more bad memories and moments of Jason than positive moments of him (the time against the Giants he threw and interception 5yds passed the line of scrimmage really sticks out, as well as the games against Dallas, Pittsburgh, Giants where he held onto the ball way way too long, where he should have thrown it away. Pretty much every game which he throws a pass that ends up being a yard short of the first down, instead of going deep.Against the Saints when he was picked off against Vilma and Giants when he stepped way to far back in the pocket and Osi stripped him and ran the fumble in for a score. The only positive moment I have of Jason is when he threw that bomb against the saints a year ago to win, then again that seems to be the only highlight of jason that espn and nfln seem to show when they talk about him)

So I say we draft Sam Bradford and make him the opening day starter, and deal with the OL in FA and what ever we don't get there, get in the draft, which we will. Who knows maybe Bruce campbell of Maryland falls to us in the second round or Bryan Bulaga of Iowa or Jason Fox (he should definitley be there) or a Ciron Black or maybe who knows a Trent Williams could fall just enough for us to trade up

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

^ I think you are dreaming! Not many of those all pro caliber tackles will be around in the 2nd round. This year seems a little shallow on OL prospects. I'm no expert, but in AllenHan I trust!

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Ok, so I know some people on this board want Sam Bradford, and others don't. For those of you who don't want him, I think you should atleast watch these two videos of Super Accurate Sam, before you completely write him off. This is all of his passes from the national championship game, against the top ranked defense of florida who has atleast 3 first round picks starting for them in this game.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMbPpvB8FpY[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cT3pjgRycg&feature=related[/ame]

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;653260]Ok, so I know some people on this board want Sam Bradford, and others don't. For those of you who don't want him, I think you should atleast watch these two videos of Super Accurate Sam, before you completely write him off. This is all of his passes from the national championship game, against the top ranked defense of florida who has atleast 3 first round picks starting for them in this game.
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMbPpvB8FpY]YouTube - Sam Bradford vs. Florida, 1st Half[/url]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cT3pjgRycg&feature=related]YouTube - Sam Bradford vs. Florida, 2nd Half[/url][/quote]
OK had a pretty good OL. Lot's of completions within 5 yds of LoS, missed at least two deep passes that should've been completed, forced INT late in the 1st half inside the 10. Forced another pass from under center into coverage in 2nd half for an INT.

The guy isn't garbage, but he isn't a franchise QB IMO. Can he be solid at the next level, possibly in the right situation. But I don't waste the #4 overall pick on him.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;653345]OK had a pretty good OL. Lot's of completions within 5 yds of LoS, missed at least two deep passes that should've been completed, forced INT late in the 1st half inside the 10. Forced another pass from under center into coverage in 2nd half for an INT.

The guy isn't garbage, but he isn't a franchise QB IMO. Can he be solid at the next level, possibly in the right situation. But I don't waste the #4 overall pick on him.[/quote]

Question: whats LoS? Also after seeing Kurt Warner last night, this guy actually reminds me a lot of Kurt. Not the worlds strongest arm, but accurate, makes good decisions, isn't a runner, attacks the blitz, stays cool and calm throughout the game.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

LoS=line of scrimmage

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;653345]OK had a pretty good OL. Lot's of completions within 5 yds of LoS, missed at least two deep passes that should've been completed, forced INT late in the 1st half inside the 10. Forced another pass from under center into coverage in 2nd half for an INT.

The guy isn't garbage, but he isn't a franchise QB IMO. Can he be solid at the next level, possibly in the right situation. But I don't waste the #4 overall pick on him.[/quote]

I'm impressed with Bradford's accuracy as well as his quick release. Both are real positives.

But otherwise, I'm not sure I would draft him at #4, either.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;653351]Question: whats LoS? Also after seeing Kurt Warner last night, this guy actually reminds me a lot of Kurt. Not the worlds strongest arm, but accurate, makes good decisions, isn't a runner, attacks the blitz, stays cool and calm throughout the game.[/quote]
I think there are some similarities, both thrive in a spread style offense, both need a strong supporting cast, both are accurate, both cost their teams championships by poor throws inside the 10 in 2009 (a big portion of that issue I blame on both their Off Coords).

The thing with Warner is IMO, coming from the AFL (even though the talent level is nowhere near NFL caliber) because of the small field he needed to fit the ball into much tighter windows. I think this was key in his development into a very accurate passer in the NFL. He was also older when he came into the NFL, hence more mature.

Will Bradford make the transition? He has a good chance in the right system with a solid supporting cast. His best bet would be to slide down in the draft to a team like Arizona who has the rest of the pieces in place but has an aging QB and runs a wide open offense, maybe the Pats. I don't think he'll be a good fit here in the WCO, where there will be an emphasis on the run and play-action. We also have some holes to fill that may take a couple of years, he'll either sit and wait or possibly have his development damaged by a lesser OL than he's used to.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Since some people really like LeFevour or Zac Robinson as possible QBs to draft heres the best highlights I could find of them.

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-7sEg7JgLQ&feature=related]YouTube - Dan LeFevour[/url]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOufQKGXpu0]YouTube - Oklahoma State QB Zac Robinson Official Highlight Reel[/url]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QP4gWiz22A&feature=related]YouTube - Zac Robinson - 2007 Highlights[/url]

If you want to see Sam Bradford highlights go to page 6 of this thread.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

#4 "worth it picks" imo
Okung
McClain
Suh
Haden -too high but he is a very good Corner.
Berry- reminds me of a certain Skin we all hold near and dear. makes plays

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Chad Jones S from LSU is also a playmaker to look at in the later rounds.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

we've already got one BUST safety from LSU...we don't need another. I'll take ciron black in rounds 4 or later though. I think we need to trade back, take CJ Spiller and hope that Brian Baluga is still around, in round two we can take the Pouncey kid from UF to replace Rabach.

It seems from what I read that Shanny wants to keep JC around...which is a good thing in reality...cause we have so many other holes...and while JC may not be a Brady or a Bree's or any other so claimed studs in the league...he is serviceable and had a great season behind our patchwork OLINE that we had.

what we need is some playmakers to surround him with, and most importantly...somebody to protect his rear end so he can turn his back to the defense on playfakes and not have to worry about getting creamed!

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=tootergray34;654546][B]we've already got one BUST safety from LSU...we don't need another. [/B] I'll take ciron black in rounds 4 or later though. I think we need to trade back, take CJ Spiller and hope that Brian Baluga is still around, in round two we can take the Pouncey kid from UF to replace Rabach.

It seems from what I read that Shanny wants to keep JC around...which is a good thing in reality...cause we have so many other holes...and while JC may not be a Brady or a Bree's or any other so claimed studs in the league...he is serviceable and had a great season behind our patchwork OLINE that we had.

what we need is some playmakers to surround him with, and most importantly...somebody to protect his rear end so he can turn his back to the defense on playfakes and not have to worry about getting creamed![/quote]

So because 1 player at a position from a school failed that means every other player at that position from the same school that follows is destined to fail also?? Landry has failed with us, i recall another safety that didnt do to well with us who went to the Steelers and was a starter on a championship defense. --Ryan Clark-- Maybe just maybe it was on the coaches of our defense and there are reasons that they are no longer here. Who knows, maybe Haslett can get LL to play up to his potential. But to say a player will fail because another player at the same position / same school did is just foolish.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

i don't know if you can say R Clark didnt do well here. his level of play was alittle more then adequate. and he kept Taylor in check

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

If the skins don't spend major $$ in free agency on the o line. How can anyone say that they should not use the first 2 draft pick on a tackle and guard or center is mind boggling to me.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Just a note, turns out we might be able to get Terrance Cody in the Second Round, if we really are switching to the 3-4 then he would be a great acquisition. However personally I would only be on board with it if we were able to get picks more picks from trades, which is possible thanks to the lack of free agents available on the market trades for veterans will probably be on the rise. Still I want to see the team come away with either Bradford/Brown (T, USC) or Okung/ McCoy (QB Texas) with our first two picks.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=redskin37;654566]If the skins don't spend major $$ in free agency on the o line. How can anyone say that they should not use the first 2 draft pick on a tackle and guard or center is mind boggling to me.[/quote]

O line needs to be addressed but there are some other positions on the team w/aging players, e.g. MLB, and positions that might see departures; CB, RB.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Bring on Bradford the next Payton manning

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

bradford the next manning? I doubt it, but that would be nice!

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Joe Haden! -ducks and runs for the door-

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[url=http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings]NFL Draft - 2010 Draft Prospects - CBSSports.com - NFLDraftScout.com[/url]

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=T.O.Killa;655601]Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. [B]Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.[/B][/quote]

If he was on the Oline i'd be pissed

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=T.O.Killa;655601]Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.[/quote]

Are you sure about Brinkley? I don't recall us or the Vikings being involved in any trade with each other in 2009 other than Erasmus James for a 7th rounder, and I think Brinkley was a 5th rounder

As for Glenn, when we drafted him most people were blasting the front office for drafting a converted running back.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Yeah Brinkley was our pick. It moved us down and we took Glenn, and got the the pick we used to pick Eddie Williams in the seventh.

Who Will Be A Redskin?
 

[IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BRADFORD]&set=key[number],value[14]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[CLAUSEN]&set=key[number],value[8]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[OKUNG]&set=key[number],value[76]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BROWN]&set=key[number],value[71]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[LEFEVOUR]&set=key[number],value[13]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[MCCOY]&set=key[number],value[12]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG]

Re: Who Will Be A Redskin
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;656013][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BRADFORD]&set=key[number],value[14]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[CLAUSEN]&set=key[number],value[8]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[OKUNG]&set=key[number],value[76]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BROWN]&set=key[number],value[71]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[LEFEVOUR]&set=key[number],value[13]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][/quote]

I'll take #76 with the number four overall please.

Re: Who Will Be A Redskin
 

[quote=Dirtbag359;656013][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BRADFORD]&set=key[number],value[14]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[CLAUSEN]&set=key[number],value[8]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[OKUNG]&set=key[number],value[76]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BROWN]&set=key[number],value[71]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[LEFEVOUR]&set=key[number],value[13]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][/quote]

I guarantee you that one of these people will be a redskin come April. I say Okung.

Re: Who Will Be A Redskin
 

[quote=Ruhskins;656022]I'll take #76 with the number four overall please.[/quote]

Lol, I also am going to have this made.

[IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[CERRATO]&set=key[number],value[SUK]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[CERRATO]&set=key[number],value[BPA]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755248_customback.chain][/IMG]

See after we lock up home field advantage in week 13, we're going to rest our starters including our QB and O-Line. When that happens we're going to have Cerrato play QB behind a line made up of practice squad players. Jason Campbell will call plays, word is he likes to call a lot of 7 step drops.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

A few more possible Redskins:
[IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[DAVIS]&set=key[number],value[75]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BULAGA]&set=key[number],value[79]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[campbell]&set=key[number],value[74]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG]

And from the "You Wish" collection:
[IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[BERRY]&set=key[number],value[34]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[SUH]&set=key[number],value[93]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG][IMG]http://lp.imageg.net/prod?set=key[name],value[MCCLAIN]&set=key[number],value[52]&set=key[displaysize],value[220]&load=url[http://chains.imageg.net/graphics/dynamic/chains/p2755243_customback.chain][/IMG]

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Good stuff Dirtbag! I'll have one of each please srarting with Okung. :)

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Please Redskins DO NOT draft a qb with the first pick! Go for Okung!

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

We could do like Jax did last year and use our first two picks on tackles, such as Okung in the 1st and Charles Brown in the second. Then, hopefully, our tackle problems would be solved for years.

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

[quote=Lotus;656299]We could do like Jax did last year and use our first two picks on tackles, such as Okung in the 1st and Charles Brown in the second. Then, hopefully, our tackle problems would be solved for years.[/quote]

Only thing that worries me about that is the fact that Jacksonville went 8-8 this year, add to that the fact that a good amount of people have said that Garrard and Campbell seem to be similar players and you wonder if it would just result in another mediocre year. Then again maybe we have better coaching and could do more with a similar level of talent. Of course obviously things don't exactly translate (ie if Team X did this then when we do that we'll get the same result as Team X).

Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
 

Bradford scares me,yea he has talent but his throwing shoulder has been crunched.and stuff like that becomes a life long problem.also he is a small quaterback as well,there are other people for consideration out there and then trade downs that could get us more picks.Terry the Tenn safety would give us a player close to SEan T. and he has been missed in more ways than has been stated.we have no ballhawking safeties at all.Landry is regressing and if Terry's shoulder is sound then he would give us a turnover creator and help to the cb's they lacked last year.terry is also a thumper and can intimidate wr's coming over the middle.Suh will be gone but if by some crazy thing he is still there we would need him.we haynesworth and unless we are going 3-4 then we need another dt.Griff is becoming more and more of a part timer.Golhston and Monty ar part timers that play good in stretches but haven't shown that they are cpaable of becoming full timers.we needlb's and oline guards and center.theres alot of holes on this team.i really hope that shanahan doesn't try a do that small oline thing in this division.i don't think it will fly so he will have to augment some of his style to fit the nfc beast.but this ab crop hasn't set me ablaze with desire and like i said with the shouldser thing and it being his throwing shoulder to boot makes hima risky propositio to me.with that type of injury you ar more suseptable to more injuries to the same arear,even career ending stuff.