![]() |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=That Guy;1108910]2 new FA DL and a top 5 pick on a new OLB?
guess they were serious about getting a pass rush.[/quote] I am fine with it. |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[url=http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Redskins-wont-pass-on-Marcus-Mariota-36114224]Report: Redskins won't pass on Marcus Mariota[/url]
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
I wouldn't pass on him either. Griffin hasn't proven to stay healthy yet. Even though I believe in him and I do think he has a good yr in 2015 I'd still take marcus. Also wonder how realistic we r at getting browner?
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=skinsfaninok;1108937]I wouldn't pass on him either. Griffin hasn't proven to stay healthy yet. Even though I believe in him and I do think he has a good yr in 2015 I'd still take marcus. Also wonder how realistic we r at getting browner?[/quote]
I would pass on him, and Browner scheduled to visit us after he leaves New Orleans |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Only way I pass is if we can trade down
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=skinsfaninok;1108940]Only way I pass is if we can trade down[/quote]
Even if we can't, I just don't think Mariota is that good. Also would you rather have Antonio Cromartie or Browner as a stop gap CB?? |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1108939]I would pass on him, and Browner scheduled to visit us after he leaves New Orleans[/quote]
So, we sign Knighton, Cox, and Browner today and call it a successful free agency. Move Hall to Safety and draft another safety to go with him (in round 3 or later). Draft Scherff (Iowa) Rd. 1 and Erving (FSU) Rd. 2. |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Rather have browner he's big and physical
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=SFREDSKIN;1108934][url=http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Redskins-wont-pass-on-Marcus-Mariota-36114224]Report: Redskins won't pass on Marcus Mariota[/url][/quote]
Clayton is just being brainless. He claims that the Bradford trade takes away all the Eagles trade-up ammo. But: 1) Bradford is part of the ammo! 2) The #2 pick the Eagles surrender is for NEXT year. 3) The Eagles still have the #20 pick and other picks besides. 4) The Eagles could also add players in a trade with, say, the Titans, like the Jets did to move up and take Sanchize. |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Still think Titans will take Mariota
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
So back to Free Agency...
Apparently we're hosting Knighton, Cox, and Browner. I think Knighton and Cox would be great picks ups. A line with Hatcher, Knighton, and Paea would be ridiculous. |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
If I were the Titans, I'd take Bradford over Mariota and not think twice, especially since they'll get more than Bradford in the trade. But that's just me.
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=Skinsfanatic;1108942]So, we sign Knighton, Cox, and Browner today and call it a successful free agency. Move Hall to Safety and draft another safety to go with him (in round 3 or later). Draft Scherff (Iowa) Rd. 1 and Erving (FSU) Rd. 2.[/quote]
If we sign those 3, I might move Hall to unemployed, and I wouldn't take Schreff at 5, Erving I like. |
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
Rather have Culliver than Cox, both solid corners with baggage.
|
Re: Who should we go for in Free Agency?
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1108959]If we sign those 3, I might move Hall to unemployed, and I wouldn't take Schreff at 5, Erving I like.[/quote]
I doubt we sign both Cox and Browner, with the need we have for a Free Safety. Unless one of them decides to play safety. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.