Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Debating with the enemy (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=75)
-   -   Arizona's New Immigration Law (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=36388)

joethiesmanfan 05-21-2010 03:01 PM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=mredskins;702681]Oh yeah! MFer get him![/quote]

How ruuuuuuuuuuude!!!!!!

JoeRedskin 05-21-2010 04:16 PM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=joethiesmanfan;702602]Bolivia and Mexico are different in my opinion. ... Bolivia, what have they contributed to America? Mexico, what have they contributed to America? [B]Our two biggest staes for starters[/B].[/quote]

Ah yes, the traditional eskimo greeting: "Hola! Habla usted espanol?".

joethiesmanfan 05-21-2010 07:00 PM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=JoeRedskin;702720]Ah yes, the traditional eskimo greeting: "Hola! Habla usted espanol?".[/quote]

Continental. Alaska is barely populated.

JoeRedskin 05-21-2010 10:50 PM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=joethiesmanfan;702740]Continental. Alaska is barely populated.[/quote]

Okay. But 1) It's a State and you initially placed no qualifications - so were you, once again, simply manipulating the english language to suit your own ends or simply being ignorant?

2) Population = Area. Excellent. Yet more stunning logic from jtf.

3) Hey, they gave us Sarah Palin. Even if you just rate population, bang for buck-wise, they are rocking the continental US!

joethiesmanfan 05-22-2010 05:31 PM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=JoeRedskin;702757]Okay. But 1) It's a State and you initially placed no qualifications - so were you, once again, simply manipulating the english language to suit your own ends or simply being ignorant?

2) Population = Area. Excellent. Yet more stunning logic from jtf.

3) Hey, they gave us Sarah Palin. Even if you just rate population, bang for buck-wise, they are rocking the continental US![/quote]

Well u win I was really talking about electoral votes.

Hog1 05-26-2010 09:37 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
This is fun. Makes you wonder what types of things ARE important to our elected officials. Like, WHAT agenda's are they really concerned with?

[URL="http://www.wsbtv.com/video/23438021/index.html"]Channel 2 Investigates U.S. Border Security Part 1 - Video - WSB Atlanta[/URL]

[URL="http://www.wsbtv.com/video/23438712/index.html"]Channel 2 Investigates U.S. Border Security Part 2 - Video - WSB Atlanta[/URL]

SmootSmack 05-26-2010 10:29 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
On this day in history

[url=http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/immigration1924.htm]Immigration Law of 1924[/url]

CRedskinsRule 05-26-2010 10:38 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=SmootSmack;703297]On this day in history

[url=http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/immigration1924.htm]Immigration Law of 1924[/url][/quote]

So they list out each country and the number of available immigrant visas but there is no Mexico listed? I thought maybe at that time it was lumped with Spain but Spain had only 131. In fact, from what I see, no country in North or South America (including Canada) is listed. Does this mean immigration was not allowed, or that it was considered more or less "open borders" at that time?

joethiesmanfan 05-26-2010 10:45 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=SmootSmack;703297]On this day in history

[url=http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/immigration1924.htm]Immigration Law of 1924[/url][/quote]

Mexico is missing off that list. I wonder why? Was the border closed at that time?

CRedskinsRule 05-26-2010 10:58 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
so in the poor man's encyclopedia known as Wikipedia it has the following two entries:
# Operation Wetback was a 1954 project of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove about 1.2 million illegal immigrants from the southwestern United States, with a focus on Mexican nationals.

# The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 discontinued quotas based on national origin, while preference given to those who have U.S. relatives. For the first time Mexican immigration was restricted.
([url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_immigration_legislation]List of United States immigration legislation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url])

How could operation wetback be targeted against illegal Mexicans in 1954, IF Mexican immigration wasn't restricted until 1965? I guess it must mean that even under an open immigration policy a certain amount of people still found it easier not to apply for legal status then to.

Interesting that until 1965 Mexicans could immigrate freely.

Hog1 05-26-2010 11:00 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
Cameroon and Logoland well accounted for.......but NO Mexico???
Quizzical......puzzling even!

CRedskinsRule 05-26-2010 11:04 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
Apparently no quotas were placed on Mexican nationals that wanted to immigrate until 1965

joethiesmanfan 05-26-2010 11:12 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=CRedskinsRule;703305]Apparently no quotas were placed on Mexican nationals that wanted to immigrate until 1965[/quote]

Interesting..... After lunch I will start thinking again, right now I am running on coffee fumes.

firstdown 05-26-2010 11:13 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
Funny now Obama is jumping on board and sending in 1500 NG. I'm guess next he will probably start to act concerned about the oil spill and fly down for a first hand view.

MTK 05-26-2010 11:19 AM

Re: Arizona's New Immigration Law
 
[quote=firstdown;703311]Funny now Obama is jumping on board and sending in 1500 NG. [B]I'm guess next he will probably start to act concerned about the oil spill and fly down for a first hand view[/B].[/quote]

He already did once... don't you remember slamming him the first time around for it?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.11412 seconds with 9 queries