![]() |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=12thMan;329315]I take Cooley over Crumpler, Witten and definitely Shockey.[/quote]
I agree with the Shockley analysis. But Crumpler and Witten are atleast as good as Cooley. Don't let your faith blind you. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=Monksdown;330589]I agree with the Shockley analysis. But Crumpler and Witten are atleast as good as Cooley. Don't let your faith blind you.[/quote]
[COLOR=black]Tellya what, compare their respective stats over past two seasons, and get back to me with your analysis.[/COLOR] [COLOR=black] [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Also, there isn't one TE in all of football I'd rather have in the open field over Chris Cooley; Not one.[/COLOR] |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
K2 is not getting the credit that he should, in my mind he is def a top 5 TE
My top 5 (in no order) Kellen Winslow Antonio Gates Todd Heap Tony Gonzolez Jeremy Shokey Witten and Cooley are probably tied for 6, my problem with cooley is all his dropped passes this past year. Which Shockey has also but Shockey seems to be bigger, faster, more clutch, and a better red zone target |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
Shockey is up there with Vick on my all-overrated team.
|
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=BeastsoftheNFCeast;330746]K2 is not getting the credit that he should, in my mind he is def a top 5 TE
My top 5 (in no order) Kellen Winslow Antonio Gates Todd Heap Tony Gonzolez Jeremy Shokey Witten and Cooley are probably tied for 6, my problem with cooley is all his dropped passes this past year. Which Shockey has also but Shockey seems to be bigger, faster, more clutch, and a better red zone target[/quote] I don't get the fascination with Winslow. He's been injured most of his short career, and yes, he had a really good season last year. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=12thMan;330755]I don't get the fascination with Winslow. He's been injured most of his short career, and yes, he had a really good season last year.[/quote]
I agree... he's had 1 good year. If he does it again this year I'll give him props, but as of right now his body of work just isn't significant enough to rank him in the top 5. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=12thMan;330593][COLOR=black]Tellya what, compare their respective stats over past two seasons, and get back to me with your analysis.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=black]Also, there isn't one TE in all of football I'd rather have in the open field over Chris Cooley; Not one.[/COLOR][/quote] [U]Tight End 2005(yds/gm) /2006(yds/gm) /Total [I]2 year[/I] TD's[/U] Cooley 48.4 /45.9 /13 Witten 47.3 /47.1 /7 Shockey 59.4 /41.5 /14 Crumpler 54.8 /48.8 /13 So i was off point on td's for witten. But Crumpler has gotten more out of each game over the last two years than Cooley. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=D'BOYZ;329351]you can take who ever you like doesn't mean you're right[/quote]
Even Parcells said he would take Cooley over Witten. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=Mattyk72;330750]Shockey is up there with Vick on my all-overrated team.[/quote]
Does Vince young back up Vick on that squad? |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=angryssg;331023]Does Vince young back up Vick on that squad?[/quote]
While they are handing the ball off to Reggie Bush and throwing to Calvin Johnson. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;331026]While they are handing the ball off to Reggie Bush and throwing to Calvin Johnson.[/quote]
I have to disagree with SS. THAT was your best post EVER! I think that was the first time that you ever made me laugh. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
[quote=angryssg;331030]I have to disagree with SS. THAT was your best post EVER! I think that was the first time that you ever made me laugh.[/quote]
I am on fire the past 2 days. Hope it doesnt wear off. |
Re: Scouts Inc. TE rankings
cooley should maybe be in the top 5 no lower than 7th.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.