Re: Mason to Ravens
 

[quote=SBXVII;470509]I was simply suggesting that it would have been better to sign someone who already knows the plays and scheme to practice squad vs signing someone who doesn't have a clue. In case (god forbid) someone gets hurt he could step up instead of us having to hunt him down and sign him.[/quote]

You're ignoring the rules though. And the rule is McMullen is ineligible for the practice squad. So it's either keep him on the 53 man roster and have him sit on the sidelines or be a gameday inactive most weeks, at the expense of some needed depth at other positions (including special teams); or just cut him outright.

Re: Mason to Ravens
 

I wish we could have signed him to the practice squad.

Re: Mason to Ravens
 

[quote=SBXVII;470509]I was simply suggesting that it would have been better to sign someone who already knows the plays and scheme to practice squad vs signing someone who doesn't have a clue. [B]In case (god forbid) someone gets hurt he could step up instead of us having to hunt him down and sign him.[/B][/quote]

If McMullen or any other player has a halfway decent agent, the minute someone gets hurt(ditto) he will be calling Vinny and co. making the same case that you just made. I doubt the Skins would have to "hunt him down".

Re: Mason to Ravens
 

Truth is we didn't need Mason.