![]() |
Re: skins v chargers
Count me in the group that is rooting for a loss.
Hopefully some young players have great games and we keep it respectable, but I want a loss. We need that top five pick. It's no guarantee to get a great player, but it usually means you get to choose the number one player at his position. |
Re: skins v chargers
I would just love to hear the pregame conversation between Turner and Zorn.
|
Re: skins v chargers
I so excited this is zorns last game. I cant take another, positive spin, aw chucks, we played good out there prees confrence after a loss. His personality is why we sucked it up so much.
Its almost over now, and we are going to engage in the biggest off season in the Snyder era. |
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=wilsowilso;648714]Count me in the group that is rooting for a loss.
Hopefully some young players have great games and we keep it respectable, but I want a loss. We need that top five pick. It's no guarantee to get a great player, but it usually means you get to choose the number one player at his position.[/quote] Since the Browns won, we automatically have a top 5 pick no matter if we win or lose. |
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=RMSkins;648771]Since the Browns won, we automatically have a top 5 pick no matter if we win or lose.[/quote]
Are you sure? Where can I find the current strength of schedule computation? I guess Seattle and Oakland had harder schedules? I know the Browns did. |
Re: skins v chargers
strength of schedule
[url=http://draftdebacled.com/teams_nfl.aspx]- NFL Teams -[/url] |
Re: skins v chargers
Looks like we will have the 4th pick and 37th pick.
|
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=CRedskinsRule;649103]Looks like we will have the 4th pick and 37th pick.[/quote]
You mean 36th? |
Re: skins v chargers
my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.
|
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=CRedskinsRule;649107]my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.[/quote]
Not bad either way. We should be able to get a couple of young studs on the o-line. I mean.....Vinny's gone......right? |
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=CRedskinsRule;649107]my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.[/quote]
We didn't tie Cleveland record-wise. Cleveland finished 5-11 and we're 4-12. |
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=CRedskinsRule;649107]my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.[/quote]
Substitute KC for Cleveland and you nailed it. |
Re: skins v chargers
[quote=Lotus;649127]Substitute KC for Cleveland and you nailed it.[/quote]
Thanks Lotus :) I was going off of memory, and can't believe Cleveland had a better record than us :( |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.