![]() |
Re: Winning
Wasn't sure where to put this but I thought it was interesting.
[url]https://www.politico.eu/article/special-counsel-robert-mueller-is-everywhere-except-the-us-midterms-2018-campaign-trail/[/url] Mueller is everywhere, except the US midterms Campaign ads and debates are mostly avoiding the Russia investigation in favor of other issues important to voters. By DARREN SAMUELSOHN 10/15/18, 12:31 PM CET Updated 10/15/18, 12:33 PM CET Special counsel Robert Mueller can’t escape the headlines, or President Donald Trump’s obsessive Twitter feed. But there’s one place the lead Russia investigator has been noticeably absent: the 2018 campaign trail. Mueller and his inquiry are missing from the campaign advertising airwaves during the final sprint to November. Debates have all but ignored the story, focusing instead on kitchen-table topics like the economy, health care and taxes. Vulnerable Democrats in red states are actually emphasizing the times they’ve reached across the aisle. |
Re: Winning
[quote=Giantone;1203098]Wasn't sure where to put this but I thought it was interesting.
[url]https://www.politico.eu/article/special-counsel-robert-mueller-is-everywhere-except-the-us-midterms-2018-campaign-trail/[/url] Mueller is everywhere, except the US midterms Campaign ads and debates are mostly avoiding the Russia investigation in favor of other issues important to voters. By DARREN SAMUELSOHN 10/15/18, 12:31 PM CET Updated 10/15/18, 12:33 PM CET Special counsel Robert Mueller can’t escape the headlines, or President Donald Trump’s obsessive Twitter feed. But there’s one place the lead Russia investigator has been noticeably absent: the 2018 campaign trail. Mueller and his inquiry are missing from the campaign advertising airwaves during the final sprint to November. Debates have all but ignored the story, focusing instead on kitchen-table topics like the economy, health care and taxes. Vulnerable Democrats in red states are actually emphasizing the times they’ve reached across the aisle.[/quote] This is an interesting article...but I think we should be talking policy vs. Russia investigation. Think its a positive by Dems. |
Re: Winning
[url]http://time.com/5424453/donald-trump-painting-andy-thomas/[/url]
That Painting of Trump Having a Diet Coke With Abraham Lincoln Is Now Hanging in the White House man, this would look good in G1's family room. |
Re: Winning
[quote=Chico23231;1203149][url]http://time.com/5424453/donald-trump-painting-andy-thomas/[/url]
That Painting of Trump Having a Diet Coke With Abraham Lincoln Is Now Hanging in the White House man, this would look good in G1's family room.[/quote] He would buy a paint brush set and paint Obama into the picture before hanging it up. |
Re: Winning
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1203151]He would buy a paint brush set and paint Obama into the picture before hanging it up.[/quote]
Naw, I’d probably would tell the artist to add Sarah Palin topless in a thong giving a table dance. That’s why everyone is smiling. Plus more pc and diverse |
Re: Winning
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1203151]He would buy a paint brush set and paint Obama into the picture before hanging it up.[/quote]
Not me, the Mrs would use it in the fire pit.:D |
Re: Winning
Elizabeth Warren can’t be this dumb?
Is she seriously gonna climb back into the thunderdome with The Big Don over this Fake Indian thing? She got tossed out bigly before and took a big L. She coming back for round 2? Lol. She must be still butthurt over the Big Kavy L she took a couple weeks ago. |
Re: Winning
The whole thing is dumb if you ask me. On both sides. Can we just fucking grow up already? Oh that's right, look at who's in charge. Mr. "I'm not a baby" but I'm actually the biggest baby out there.
|
Re: Winning
Fakeahontas...
Now that she’s certified, I want her to lead us out the tunnel versus the Boys in full Native American attire. I gotta feeling Bigly is gonna make her smoke his peace pipe. Horseface Stormy style |
Re: Winning
[quote=Chico23231;1203152]Naw, I’d probably would tell the artist to add Sarah Palin topless in a thong giving a table dance. That’s why everyone is smiling. Plus more pc and diverse[/quote]
............for chico, [IMG]https://www.jmg-galleries.com/blog_images/sarah_palin_bikini_gun_photo.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Winning
Remember the good old days when the President didn’t waste time tweeting insults? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
|
Re: Winning
[QUOTE=MTK;1203222]The whole thing is dumb if you ask me. On both sides. Can we just fucking grow up already? Oh that's right, look at who's in charge. Mr. "I'm not a baby" but I'm actually the biggest baby out there.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, Captain Snowflake is really making a joke out of this country. It is beyond embarrassing at this point. Just a shit stain on our historical timeline. |
Re: Winning
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1203214]Elizabeth Warren can’t be this dumb?
Is she seriously gonna climb back into the thunderdome with The Big Don over this Fake Indian thing? She got tossed out bigly before and took a big L. She coming back for round 2? Lol. She must be still butthurt over the Big Kavy L she took a couple weeks ago.[/QUOTE] Fake Indian, fake president. What’s the difference. At least she is like 1/8th an Indian. |
Re: Winning
[quote=punch it in;1203247]Yeah, Captain Snowflake is really making a joke out of this country. It is beyond embarrassing at this point. Just a shit stain on our historical timeline.[/quote]
It's all cool , I got an extra $20 bucks in my pay check so to hell with everything else.:cheers |
Re: Winning
[QUOTE=Giantone;1203254]It's all cool , I got an extra $20 bucks in my pay check so to hell with everything else.:cheers[/QUOTE]
That really is the essence of it, isn’t it? He, and most of his base value money above everything. If you value money he is the last guy you should call the pied piper as you follow him into the deep dark woods. he is not some savvy businessman. Tons of failed businesses, and ventures. Most banks wont even touch him. He cheats, lies, and avoids paying taxes to keep his wheels turning. Now our country is literally his own personal llc, and he lies and cheats and has everyone believing things are booming. It is absurd. He is doing nothing short of bankrupting our country. |
Winning
He is doing everything in his power for a quick spike, and record this and that, and all the praise that comes with it, but it will not last, and when it is over we will be worse off. Very similar to his previous business ventures. Struts around looking like a beautiful peacock until the the feathers he stuck on the pigeons ass fall off and than he is gone. maybe “we the people “ can sue him like all the other people have before once his latest and greatest con job is over.
|
Re: Winning
Democratic Senator claims heritage for ability to deceive admissions board, same Senator cried foul over a senior yearbook. With elections coming up and the hypocrisy of the dems on full display, I would say the president is making sure the Republicans make gains in the Senate.
This is all political theater for the tmz generation. People who look at real accomplishments dont give two hoots about the back and forth drama the media (i include fox in this) makes daily. |
Re: Winning
[IMG]https://pics.me.me/evil-kermit-arealevilkermit-me-dont-talk-about-politics-it-always-7237801.png[/IMG]
|
Re: Winning
[quote=punch it in;1203248]Fake Indian, fake president. What’s the difference. At least she is like 1/8th an Indian.[/quote]
actually much much less than that... but I more worried about her ideas like this: [url]https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/15/economist-warrens-accountable-capitalism-act-seriously-misguided-.html[/url] •Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Accountable Capitalism Act would help destroy capitalism, says Harvard University economics professor Jeffrey Miron. Shit like this is typical Soviet-Era type Government controlled economy...Socialism with a touch of Communism. Anybody that supports her, supports this type of thinking is seriously deranged. |
Re: Winning
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1203277]actually much much less than that...
but I more worried about her ideas like this: [url]https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/15/economist-warrens-accountable-capitalism-act-seriously-misguided-.html[/url] •Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Accountable Capitalism Act would help destroy capitalism, says Harvard University economics professor Jeffrey Miron. Shit like this is typical Soviet-Era type Government controlled economy...Socialism with a touch of Communism. Anybody that supports her, supports this type of thinking is seriously deranged.[/QUOTE] Yup especially when there is so much blood money to be made....[emoji849] |
Re: Winning
I could care less if Elizabeth warren claims Native American heritage to be honest white people are entirely responsible for anybody with even a minuscule of ethnic minority diversity as identifying as such.
|
Re: Winning
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1203296]I could care less if Elizabeth warren claims Native American heritage to be honest white people are entirely responsible for anybody with even a minuscule of ethnic minority diversity as identifying as such.[/quote]
What does that even mean? You don't care if Warren (who is white) claims to have a Native American heritage because white people are entirely responsible for people making such claims. Shouldn't you, by that logic, be extremely ticked off, that a prominent white politician used that claim to knowingly and falsely take advantage of that identification for self advancement? This topic really should be in the hypocrisy thread. |
Re: Winning
You are right this should be in the hypocrisy thread. What I mean is that we are so hell bent on forcing identification of race and ethnicity that we should not be surprised when people use it as such. I cannot justify being ticked off when we are the ones that continue to support and reelect said politicians. Until we stop we are going to reap what we sow. Personally I am more upset that the dubious genetic test is being used as evidence, our scientific understanding is atrocious and an embarrassment.
|
Re: Winning
[quote=BaltimoreSkins;1203304]You are right this should be in the hypocrisy thread. What I mean is that we are so hell bent on forcing identification of race and ethnicity that we should not be surprised when people use it as such. I cannot justify being ticked off when we are the ones that continue to support and reelect said politicians. Until we stop we are going to reap what we sow. Personally I am more upset that the dubious genetic test is being used as evidence, our scientific understanding is atrocious and an embarrassment.[/quote]
Thanks for clarifying. I am in total agreement with you. |
Re: Winning
According to RCP polling averages if the election were counted today, the Republicans actually gain 2 senate seats
[url]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/2018_elections_senate_map_no_toss_ups.html[/url] The house is going to be a quagmire of nothingness. Many on here won't believe this, but I'm kind of hoping the house goes democratic. And my rationale is history. I think Reagan made alot of good compromises when he had to deal with Tip O'Neal. I didn't necessarily like all of them, but the split government works better for Republicans if they have the Senate and Presidency. I would even say when Clinton lost the House, it made his presidency better too. With the whole house up every 2 years, I think it makes negotiations more accomplishable then in the senate where only 1/3 changes at a time. Maybe a Democratic house and Republican senate could work together with Trump, and actually make headway on healthcare, immigration, and the country's debt issue. The country has to find a way to move forward in some unity. Doesn't it? |
Re: Winning
[url]http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careersandeducation/wages-and-salaries-jump-by-31percent-highest-level-in-a-decade/ar-BBP9L3H?ocid=ientp[/url]
Wages and salaries jump by 3.1%, highest level in a decade [B][U]Wage increases have been the missing link in the economy since the recovery began in mid-2008[/U][/B]. |
Re: Winning
What an amazing idea, paying people more helps the economy. Wonder where we’ve heard that before.
|
Re: Winning
[URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/10/30/dont-fall-for-trumps-desperate-race-baiting-birthright-citizenship-stunt/?utm_term=.0f0305e2db26"]Fuck This Guy[/URL]
Where's the outrage from "normal citizens"? If you don't want to be called a racist then you should probably speak up at some point. |
Re: Winning
[QUOTE=jamf;1205207][URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/10/30/dont-fall-for-trumps-desperate-race-baiting-birthright-citizenship-stunt/?utm_term=.0f0305e2db26"]Fuck This Guy[/URL]
Where's the outrage from "normal citizens"? If you don't want to be called a racist then you should probably speak up at some point.[/QUOTE] How about that economy |
Re: Winning
[quote=MTK;1205204]What an amazing idea, paying people more helps the economy. Wonder where we’ve heard that before.[/quote]
No, it's the reverse, a growing economy helps raise all the boats. It worked with Reagan's tax cuts, and it's working now. We've had several quarters of positive GDP growth, lower unemployment, and those pressures, not government interference are what lead to wage growth. |
Re: Winning
[quote=jamf;1205207][URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/10/30/dont-fall-for-trumps-desperate-race-baiting-birthright-citizenship-stunt/?utm_term=.0f0305e2db26"]Fuck This Guy[/URL]
Where's the outrage from "normal citizens"? If you don't want to be called a racist then you should probably speak up at some point.[/quote] There's more than enough faux outrage from the left. Recall that Harry Reid(I know it's a talking point name) once proposed ending birthright citizenship. I won't say I know much on the topic, but I do know that Trump loves to push liberals to hypocritical positions, especially on immigration. It's why dems are pretty silent over the issue, because they all supported most of the positions - until Trump was the one suggesting it. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States#Opposition_to_birthright_citizenship[/url] [quote]Both Democrats and Republicans have introduced legislation aimed at narrowing the application of the Citizenship Clause. In 1993, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced legislation that would limit birthright citizenship to the children of U.S. citizens and legally resident aliens, and similar bills have been introduced by other legislators in every Congress since.[79] For example, U.S. Representative Nathan Deal, a Republican from the State of Georgia, introduced the "Citizenship Reform Act of 2005" (H.R. 698) in the 109th Congress,[80] the "Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007" (H.R. 1940)[81] in the 110th Congress, and the "Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009" (H.R. 1868)[82] in the 111th Congress. However, neither these nor any similar bill has ever been passed by Congress. Some legislators, unsure whether such Acts of Congress would survive court challenges, have proposed that the Citizenship Clause be changed through a constitutional amendment.[83] Senate Joint Resolution 6, introduced on January 16, 2009 in the 111th Congress, proposes such an amendment;[84] however, neither this, nor any other proposed amendment, has yet been approved by Congress for ratification by the states.[/quote] In terms of racist mentality how about HRC's joke that all blacks look the same, and the raucous laughter it got? Oh Outrage wherefore art thou. |
Re: Winning
[quote=MTK;1205204]What an amazing idea, paying people more helps the economy. Wonder where we’ve heard that before.[/quote]
Paying people more when business are thriving is one thing forcing a business to pay higher wages usually has a negative affect. |
Re: Winning
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1205223]There's more than enough faux outrage from the left. Recall that Harry Reid(I know it's a talking point name) once proposed ending birthright citizenship.
I won't say I know much on the topic, but I do know that Trump loves to push liberals to hypocritical positions, especially on immigration. It's why dems are pretty silent over the issue, because they all supported most of the positions - until Trump was the one suggesting it. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States#Opposition_to_birthright_citizenship[/url] In terms of racist mentality how about HRC's joke that all blacks look the same, and the raucous laughter it got? Oh Outrage wherefore art thou.[/quote] The left was also for building a wall and protecting our boarder. You pick any top Democrat and I can find a clip of them wanting tougher immigration laws. |
Re: Winning
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1205223]There's more than enough faux outrage from the left. Recall that Harry Reid(I know it's a talking point name) once proposed ending birthright citizenship.
I won't say I know much on the topic, but I do know that Trump loves to push liberals to hypocritical positions, especially on immigration. It's why dems are pretty silent over the issue, because they all supported most of the positions - until Trump was the one suggesting it. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States#Opposition_to_birthright_citizenship[/url] In terms of racist mentality how about HRC's joke that all blacks look the same, and the raucous laughter it got? Oh Outrage wherefore art thou.[/quote] it's disgusting but Conservatives have tuned out Liberals while Liberals have done the same to Conservatives. Why not stand up to your own party instead of just going along with this bigotry? Maybe this is more appropriate for the Enough... thread. |
Re: Winning
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1205222]No, it's the reverse, a growing economy helps raise all the boats. It worked with Reagan's tax cuts, and it's working now.
We've had several quarters of positive GDP growth, lower unemployment, and those pressures, not government interference are what lead to wage growth.[/quote] Please don't try to sell us on trickle down BS. A tax cut on it's own doesn't help everyone. Just like wages alone don't raise an economy, but low wages have been a problem for a long time. When giant corporations pay garbage wages that force people to stay on assistance programs it's a lose/lose for everyone. Nothing wrong with pressuring companies to pay their employees a livable wage. |
Re: Winning
[quote=Back2RFK;1205237]The left was also for building a wall and protecting our boarder. You pick any top Democrat and I can find a clip of them wanting tougher immigration laws.[/quote]
This isn't about a wall or National Security; This is just a racist dog whistle before primaries to drum up votes. Edit: Deleted the part about morals. That was a low a blow. |
Re: Winning
A tax cut, reduced regulations, a business friendly environment all encourage businesses to make capital investments as well as increases competition for quality employees, which raises wages. We had eight years of stagnant growth, and no wage increase, we have 1 1/2 years of fiscal conservative approach and we see wage growth. You can call it BS all you want but the wage increases, and rising gdp say otherwise. (Tariffs help wages too because US employers don't compete against outside labor practices but don't tell that to the press)
|
Re: Winning
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1205258]A tax cut, reduced regulations, a business friendly environment all encourage businesses to make capital investments.[/quote]
..............and that is where it is ending . I love the reduced regulations but hey people don't need drinking water we got 20's dollars back in our checks .;) |
Re: Winning
I don't think there has ever been another issue like Illegal Immigration/Immigration with so many garbage narratives on both sides.
Step 1 Should we have a secure border which should keep our people and country safe? Yes Step 2 Should we have people who want to come into this country legally through Port of Entry? Yes Step 3 Should we have people who have lived here illegally have some sort of pathway of citizenship? Yes |
Re: Winning
[quote=jamf;1205253]it's disgusting but Conservatives have tuned out Liberals while Liberals have done the same to Conservatives.
Why not stand up to your own party instead of just going along with this bigotry? Maybe this is more appropriate for the Enough... thread.[/quote] I would prefer that people acknowledge what the reality on the ground is. That is that most Americans, conservative or liberal, are NOT racist. That not every misspoke word is meant to slander or demean. That political correctness is not free speech but controlled speech. And that this country is great BECAUSE of every citizens unique makeup combined with our National heritage. The being American IS worth a damn, and that we are Americans first, and our cultural heritage second. That when the song says and I'm proud to be an American, where at least I know I'm free, they are talking about every person, white black, rich poor. There are a percentage of Americans who are racist, a smaller percentage that are hate filled racists, they make themselves known, and should be dealt with by law enforcement when they act out, but we as Americans should recognize that they ARE the small percentage of population - the bad eggs so to say. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.