![]() |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1334914]Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi · 27.They also received an astonishing variety of requests from officials asking for individuals they didn’t like to be banned. Here, the office for Democrat and House Intel Committee chief Adam Schiff asks Twitter to ban journalist Paul Sperry: [IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FllCJKgX0AUYAA_?format=jpg&name=large[/IMG] Here is Adam Schiff directly asking Heads of twitters to censor speech and opinions he doesn’t like. Just fuckin amazing he had a direct line to them and then the audacity to direct them to remove and ban people. Clear violation of first amendment right by government official. Pretty cool Twitter rejected his request[/quote] I'd bet money on it that he had no friends growing up and didn't get laid until he somehow duped his wife into marrying him. He's one insufferable asshole. |
Re: Media Bias
Funny .. you post about how you hate this leftist trans person bc they post mis-information
Next day ... you complain about a Q Anon spreader not getting loved enough Ive never heard either one of these people names before (tranny or q anon guy), chico you are going into the dark corners of the internet .. then complaining about finding cockrocahes. ---------- If you hate trans people ... dont spend so much time reading and following trans people. I dont get it. Its pretty easy to go throughout an entire day and not read a trans article, not see a trans person, not have a trans person have any effect on your life ... the only time i see the word "trans" or think "trans" is when you type and talk about it here. its weird .... spending your days OBSESSED with this fringe thing you can easily avoid |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1334961]Funny .. you post about how you hate this leftist trans person bc they post mis-information
Next day ... you complain about a Q Anon spreader not getting loved enough Ive never heard either one of these people names before (tranny or q anon guy), chico you are going into the dark corners of the internet .. then complaining about finding cockrocahes. ---------- If you hate trans people ... dont spend so much time reading and following trans people. I dont get it. Its pretty easy to go throughout an entire day and not read a trans article, not see a trans person, not have a trans person have any effect on your life ... the only time i see the word "trans" or think "trans" is when you type and talk about it here. its weird .... spending your days OBSESSED with this fringe thing you can easily avoid[/quote] The thing here is Schiff is not specific and is just grouping narratives he doesn’t like as “Qanon”. Twitter sees this and rejects it. You can try to strawman all you like but Schiff lied to the American people daily about having evidence he saw in committee about Trump and Russian collusion. There was never any. Here he is caught attempting to silence a journalist and opinions he doesn’t like. When the government does or attempts that…it’s actually fascism. Bro so when tranny liars are picked up and published as experts in CNN, MSNBC and NBC news…you are telling me they are amplifying lies they seek out in the darkest corners of the internet? This is why corporate media is dying…and when I point multiple examples of fake news and how the sausage is made they get big mad |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1334971]The thing here is Schiff is not specific and is just grouping narratives he doesn’t like as “Qanon”. Twitter sees this and rejects it. You can try to strawman all you like but Schiff lied to the American people daily about having evidence he saw in committee about Trump and Russian collusion. There was never any. Here he is caught attempting to silence a journalist and opinions he doesn’t like. When the government does or attempts that…it’s actually fascism.
Bro so when tranny liars are picked up and published as experts in CNN, MSNBC and NBC news…you are telling me they are amplifying lies they seek out in the darkest corners of the internet? This is why corporate media is dying…and when I point multiple examples of fake news and how the sausage is made they get big mad[/quote] Bro Fake news you never acknowledge..................... [IMG]https://i0.wp.com/www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Jim-Jordan-on-Fox-News.png?resize=600%2C329&ssl=1[/IMG] [IMG]https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_nbcnews-fp-1200-630,f_auto,q_auto:best/mpx/2704722219/2021_12/1639795894184_n_reidout_jimjordanmarkmeadows_211217_1920x1080-002xgv.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Media Bias
[B]chico why don't you ever worry about this Fake News from assholes like this guy?
[/B] [SIZE="6"]Timeline: Rep. Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6[/SIZE] [IMG]https://i0.wp.com/www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Jim-Jordan-on-Fox-News-08.02.2021.png?resize=600%2C344&ssl=1[/IMG] Congressman Jordan took the following actions: 1)Suggested Democrats will try to steal the election (starting Aug. 22, 2020) 2)Suggested and directly alleged the election was stolen (starting Nov. 5, 2020) 3)Endorsed Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell’s call to investigate Dominion and Smartmatic (starting Nov. 15, 2020) 4)Called for immediate congressional investigations of alleged election fraud (starting Nov. 18, 2020) 5)Endorsed state legislators’ picking their own electors (starting Dec. 7, 2020) 6)Said Trump should not concede (starting Dec. 7, 2020) 7)Started public call to object to certification on Jan. 6 (starting Dec. 13, 2020) 8)Supported call for “special counsel” to investigate alleged election fraud (starting Dec. 10, 2020) 9)Called Jan. 6 the “ultimate date of significance” (Dec. 16, 2020) 10)Met with President Trump and small group of House Republicans to coordinate plans to object to certification on January 6 (Dec. 21, 2020) 11)Raised Trump supporters’ expectations by saying he hoped a majority of Congress will object on January 6 (Jan. 5, 2021) 12)Helped lead the effort to vote against certification on January 6 (starting Dec. 13, 2020) 13)Called for Trump supporters to remain peaceful, but does not say to disperse (Jan. 6, 2021 3:02 PM) 14)Made false claims about Speaker Pelosi and security preparations for January 6 (starting Feb. 15, 2021) 15)Revealed for the first time that he spoke with President Trump on Jan. 6 (July 28, 2021) |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1334961]Funny .. you post about how you hate this leftist trans person bc they post mis-information
Next day ... you complain about a [B]Q Anon spreader[/B] not getting loved enough [/quote] Are you referring to Paul Sperry???? |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=nonniey;1334986]Are you referring to Paul Sperry????[/quote]
Ha…that made me seriously laugh out loud. But yes Adam Schiff wanted him banned not because of Qanon but bc Paul was getting info about his committee from a leaker I believe. Sperry has already laughed this off from my understanding |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=nonniey;1334986]Are you referring to Paul Sperry????[/quote]
Did your Paul Sperry claim on twitter that: - Obama had a secret army to take down trump - Jan 6th was an antifa false flag OP - trump was right about invermicin - the FBI raided Mar A lago bc Trump had dirt to take them down But yeah .. that guy seems to be a great example of what Chico is complaining about. How rumors become news by willing media schills. Sperry says something unconfirmed on twitter like "antifa is here at Capitol" on January 6th .. then Candace Ownes repeats it ... then certain republican congressmen like Matt Gaetz actually stand on the floor of the Capitol saying "antifa is doing it" [url]https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/01/12/how-antifa-conspiracy-theory-traveled-fringe-floor-congress/6620908002/[/url] ---- End of the day, I dont care who Sperry is, what some tranny says or what twitter bans or doesnt ban. I just enjoy the endless examples of conservatives being huge hypocrites. Today its complaining about how twitter rumors get picked up and turned into "news" by willing media participants. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1335007]Did your Paul Sperry claim on twitter that:
- Obama had a secret army to take down trump - Jan 6th was an antifa false flag OP - trump was right about invermicin - the FBI raided Mar A lago bc Trump had dirt to take them down But yeah .. that guy seems to be a great example of what Chico is complaining about. How rumors become news by willing media schills. Sperry says something unconfirmed on twitter like "antifa is here at Capitol" on January 6th .. then Candace Ownes repeats it ... then certain republican congressmen like Matt Gaetz actually stand on the floor of the Capitol saying "antifa is doing it" [url]https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/01/12/how-antifa-conspiracy-theory-traveled-fringe-floor-congress/6620908002/[/url][/quote] Paul Sperry is Q, got it. Sperry was doing investigative reporting and has correct sources and info for a story. Adam Schiff, who lied repeatedly about having seen documented evidence about Russian collusion, wanted the narrative silenced, a journalist removed among others…because he in favor of censorship. That’s the government infringing on A1 folks and what fascist do. Not even Twitter executives bought it. Bro if you think C Owens is CNN, NBC News or MSNBC… Censorship is over at Twitter, censorship, shadow bans…all the evidence is out there to see now. That’s why the left is big mad because liars they support in the Democratic Party are being exposed. |
Re: Media Bias
I love how he shuts down FOX!
[url]https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1611151176447164418[/url] |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/09/russian-trolls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/[/url]
A study finds minimal impact from Russian influence operations on Twitter in the Trump-Clinton presidential race Yet mainstream media just lied about this for years without actually doing any research or having data to support the claim. Face it, Clinton loss because she was a terrible candidate and there was a hangover from a poor Obama presidency which talked alot but couldn’t deliever. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1335811][url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/09/russian-trolls-twitter-had-little-influence-2016-voters/[/url]
A study finds minimal impact from Russian influence operations on Twitter in the Trump-Clinton presidential race Yet mainstream media just lied about this for years without actually doing any research or having data to support the claim. Face it, Clinton loss because she was a terrible candidate and there was a hangover from a poor Obama presidency which talked alot but couldn’t deliever.[/quote] Nice article find. Also said: - Hyper partisan republicans were exposed to Russia twitter dis-information 9 times more than non-republicans - Study only looks at twitter and finds 32 Million people were exposed to Russian propaganda, Facebook estimated 126 Million were exposed on Facebook - People were exposed to Russia bot dis-information bc they would be following some who then would re-tweet the Russia disinformation (I assume this is the Candace ownes, Tucker Carlsons, Sperry of the world) - Russian hack and release of Democrat emails probably played a significant role in the 2016 outcome -------------- “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” ------------------ [IMG]https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2018/03/GettyImages-8727806941-e1521676525104-1024x637.jpg[/IMG] Find someone who looks at you the Way Vlad does to Donald. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1335817]Nice article find.
Also said: - Hyper partisan republicans were exposed to Russia twitter dis-information 9 times more than non-republicans - Study only looks at twitter and finds 32 Million people were exposed to Russian propaganda, Facebook estimated 126 Million were exposed on Facebook - People were exposed to Russia bot dis-information bc they would be following some who then would re-tweet the Russia disinformation (I assume this is the Candace ownes, Tucker Carlsons, Sperry of the world) - Russian hack and release of Democrat emails probably played a significant role in the 2016 outcome -------------- “I will tell you this, Russia: If you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” ------------------ [IMG]https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2018/03/GettyImages-8727806941-e1521676525104-1024x637.jpg[/IMG] Find someone who looks at you the Way Vlad does to Donald.[/quote] Minimal impact…in other words a nothing burger. I know it’s tough to deal with the data and facts. We know from the Twitter files communications that in 2020 that when NBC news once again published fake news articles that Russia was “ramping up troll farms to impact elections” direct emails between FBI and head of Twitter security confirmed this was false. No evidence, once again. Clinton only loss because she was a loser candidate. |
Re: Media Bias
Very odd that the massive month-long violent unrest in Peru, which has resulted in 47 deaths in the last week, has received a tiny fraction of the coverage of riots in Brazil that resulted in zero deaths. Maybe it's because the rioters in Peru are Left-wing radicals.
-Shapiro Say it again for everyone in the back! Media only reports what supports their corrupt ideology |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1335821]Minimal impact…in other words a nothing burger. I know it’s tough to deal with the data and facts. We know from the Twitter files communications that in 2020 that when NBC news once again published fake news articles that Russia was “ramping up troll farms to impact elections” direct emails between FBI and head of Twitter security confirmed this was false. No evidence, once again.
Clinton only loss because she was a loser candidate.[/quote] When you read that article ... I honestly thought of you. That 1% of the hyper partisan right wing that was responsible for 70% of the russian bot mis information traffic. Russian bot tweets misinformation => right wing twitter person re tweets it => chico follows right wing twitter guy and now retweets the retweet of the russian bot misinformation propaganda --- You are that 1%. That 1% of americans who are so "fuck liberals!!" that you are a russian mark. A useful idiot who just spreads and amplifies russian propaganda looking to cause discord in this country ... all the while ironically drapped in an american flag screaming We The People Thats all you do. Spread political hate and discord .... in the name of what? "owning liberals? Owning me or G1? the freedom to write "retard" and then stick your middle finger up to people who say thats not cool. Idk .. I dont get it. Maybe I do, maybe im probably blind to my own problems .. I certainly am a fuck christian nationalist, fuck most evangelicals person. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1335986]When you read that article ... I honestly thought of you. That 1% of the hyper partisan right wing that was responsible for 70% of the russian bot mis information traffic.
Russian bot tweets misinformation => right wing twitter person re tweets it => chico follows right wing twitter guy and now retweets the retweet of the russian bot misinformation propaganda --- You are that 1%. That 1% of americans who are so "fuck liberals!!" that you are a russian mark. A useful idiot who just spreads and amplifies russian propaganda looking to cause discord in this country ... all the while ironically drapped in an american flag screaming We The People Thats all you do. Spread political hate and discord .... in the name of what? "owning liberals? Owning me or G1? the freedom to write "retard" and then stick your middle finger up to people who say thats not cool. Idk .. I dont get it. Maybe I do, maybe im probably blind to my own problems .. I certainly am a fuck christian nationalist, fuck most evangelicals person.[/quote] Like lefties in Twitter said to the FBI, Little evidence Russia influence in 2020 during the election and like this article said, 2016 Russia had little influence on Social media on the election. You can ignore it like the DNC ignored the FBI when they asked to see the alleged hacked servers back then. Oh Sunnyside you guys go from defending Obama weak Russian policies when he allowed the Russians to take Crimea, refuse to arm Ukraine, refuse to isolate Russia, laugh at Mitt Romney “1980s wants their foreign policy back”…disputing warning from the Trump administration to the EU stop depending on Russia oil, anger he supplied lethal arms to Ukraine, signed a security deal with Poland….to now defending removing sanctions from nordstream with the Russias, to defending Biden who was unable to stop Russians from war in Europe. I know it’s tough when you have to deal with the facts now that everything is being exposed that the entire “ Russia narrative” was just another Democrat op that you bought into. The Russia collusion hoax, and now no influence on 2016 and 2020 election. Who is the useful idiot? The person who was spoon fed this bs narrative from the mainstream media? |
Re: Media Bias
[IMG]https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/mobile/000/023/397/C-658VsXoAo3ovC.jpg[/IMG]
|
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1335987]
[B]I know it’s tough when you have to deal with the facts [/B][/quote] [SIZE="5"]LOL, this really made my day!!![B][/B][/SIZE] |
Re: Media Bias
Waiting for the “Gas Stove rooted in White Supremacy” article to drop. That’s their go to when bullshitting and fear mongering the American people. Whatever distraction it takes away from the serious problems people are facing
|
Re: Media Bias
You mean BS like this?
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmIaQcjXEBACooT?format=jpg&name=small[/IMG] |
Re: Media Bias
More foolishness
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmRIwOyXwAML4WC?format=jpg&name=small[/IMG] |
Re: Media Bias
Glad we agree government should not be deciding how you cook.
Here is Kathy Hochel trying to pass legislation [url]https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/hochul-proposes-banning-natural-gas-new-buildings[/url] Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) announced a proposal Tuesday that would make New York the first state to ban natural gas heaters and appliances in new buildings, a new front in the battle over the use of the fossil fuel and its link to certain air pollutants. Hochul used her annual “State of the State” address to call for a ban on fossil fuels in new buildings beginning in 2025. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1336072]Glad we agree government should not be deciding how you cook.
Here is Kathy Hochel trying to pass legislation [url]https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/hochul-proposes-banning-natural-gas-new-buildings[/url] Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-NY) announced a proposal Tuesday that would make New York the first state to ban natural gas heaters and appliances in new buildings, a new front in the battle over the use of the fossil fuel and its link to certain air pollutants. Hochul used her annual “State of the State” address to call for a ban on fossil fuels in new buildings beginning in 2025.[/quote] You do realize what MTK posted and what you posted are not the same thing? LOL, of course you don't. |
Re: Media Bias
Hopefully they take the guns and the stoves on the same trip. Let's be efficient with this baby!!
|
Re: Media Bias
chico , I surprised you're not crying about this,............yet!
I dare you to read it? [url]https://news.yahoo.com/hunter-bidens-tangled-tale-comes-124714839.html[/url] [B]The New York Times Hunter Biden's Tangled Tale Comes Front and Center Adam Entous, Michael S. Schmidt and Katie Benner Thu, January 12, 2023 at 7:47 AM EST[/B] |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1335987]Like lefties in Twitter said to the FBI, Little evidence Russia influence in 2020 during the election and like this article said, 2016 Russia had little influence on Social media on the election. You can ignore it like the DNC ignored the FBI when they asked to see the alleged hacked servers back then.
[/quote] Sorry for being an asshole to you yesterday I get my panties in a bunch sometimes |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=SunnySide;1336080]Sorry for being an asshole to you yesterday
I get my panties in a bunch sometimes[/quote] No apologies here, this is the land of the wolves. I kid I kid… SS you never have to apologize, you always good man |
Re: Media Bias
Maybe gas stoves are what finally unites both parties. 🤣🤣🤣
[url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/colbert-mocks-gas-stove-ban-floated-biden-administration-you-see-hell?dicbo=v2-5220f79124f73e6797d02bd4a1546129[/url] |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1336154]Maybe gas stoves are what finally unites both parties. 🤣🤣🤣
[url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/colbert-mocks-gas-stove-ban-floated-biden-administration-you-see-hell?dicbo=v2-5220f79124f73e6797d02bd4a1546129[/url][/quote] All this is are the climate activist literally trying to get their foot in the door of your home in order not to shut down the stove but all gas to homes. They have talked about this for years and the pollution isn’t from cooking but heating. They are first trying to get the foothold with a ban on stove and use it to ban all gas in the building. It’s easy to see. A Biden regulator literally floated a ban on stoves “on the table” early in the week…along with the Hochel legislation…it’s ridiculous Of course democrats will do what they always do say “this isn’t happening…then move too it’s happening and it’s good it’s happening” ala crt, children trans surgery and chemical castration using “puberty blockers”, late term abortion, etc. Democrats have to lie because they know honest policy discussion of their positions a majority of Americans don’t support. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1336161]
Democrats don't have to lie because they know honest policy discussion of their positions a majority of Americans do support.[/quote] [B][SIZE="6"]Fixed for honesty![/SIZE][/B] |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://jonathanturley.org/2023/01/18/sulzberger-disinformation-in-the-most-existential-problem-facing-the-planet-today/[/url]
Sulzberger: Disinformation is the “Most Existential Problem” Facing the Planet Today Turley appropriately picking up the hammer to destroy the frame of Sulzberger arguments |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Chico23231;1336632][url]https://jonathanturley.org/2023/01/18/sulzberger-disinformation-in-the-most-existential-problem-facing-the-planet-today/[/url]
Sulzberger: Disinformation is the “Most Existential Problem” Facing the Planet Today Turley appropriately picking up the hammer to destroy the frame of Sulzberger arguments[/quote] ...............stfu. LOL, that felt good! |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://twitter.com/MythinformedMKE/status/1625505017900974082/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1625505017900974082¤tTweetUser=MythinformedMKE[/url]
The speed with which they can shuffle somebody into the Hitler of the month club.” Joe Rogan and Matt Taibbi discuss how left wing media created a Elon Musk “bad now” narrative based on nothing. Rogan and Taibbi nail it |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://twitter.com/KevinTober94/status/1625659203959287810?cxt=HHwWhMCzndqbwI8tAAAA[/url]
The only network that came close to reporting on the news that the Michigan State shooter had his prior felony gun charge dropped by a Soros-backed DA was NBC Nightly News. ABC's World News Tonight and CBS Evening News failed to mention this detail of his background. Blood on the democrat soft on crime hands…we ain’t doing no fucking gun reform until you start enforcing the gun laws on the books Like we all know, most gun crime (75-85%) committed with an illegal gun, so start locking up criminal trash for possession of an illegal gun. Until then, don’t talk about gun control |
Re: Media Bias
[url]https://news.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-packages-2-biggest-125955212.html[/url]
[B]Tucker Carlson Packages 2 Of His Biggest Lies In 1 Stupefying Statemen[/B] chico's hero! Tucker Carlson: "January 6th I think is probably second only to the 2020 election as the biggest scam in my lifetime." LOL, JHC! |
Re: Media Bias
Watching Ana Kasparian slowly take the red pill has been extremely enjoyable
[url]https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1646169926032322560[/url] Her meltdown about how incompetent and unprepared California is with moving to electric vehicle and the cost of the move while exclaiming the middle class is the most screwed people in the entire country…she’s finally starting to understand Gives me hope for Mooby |
Re: Media Bias
[B]'Such An Idiot': Nicolle Wallace Bursts Out Laughing Over Trump Comment On Fox News
The MSNBC anchor took aim at the former president's embrace of authoritarian leaders.[/B] Josephine Harvey By Josephine Harvey [url]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nicolle-wallace-trump-tucker-carlson-interview_n_6437414de4b066950598926e[/url] MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace laughed in disbelief after showing viewers an excerpt from Donald Trump’s recent interview with Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which the former president lauded authoritarian leaders as “top of the line.” “You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep, or in the case of the twice-impeached, disgraced, now-indicted ex-president, the people they praise loudly on Fox News,” Wallace said Wednesday. She showed viewers a clip from Trump’s Fox News interview, which aired Tuesday. “They’re all top of the line,” Trump said of Chinese President Xi Jinping, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un and Russian President Vladimir Putin. “Our guy’s not top of the line ― never was,” he added, referring to President Joe Biden. Trump also called Xi a “brilliant man” and praised Kim and Putin as “very smart.” Hooting with laughter, Wallace said: “I don’t even know where to start. No one called you top of the line. Ever!” The MSNBC host noted that she typically avoids amplifying Trump or Fox News, but said that this rhetoric provided important context on the recent Republican-led efforts to strip back abortion rights, implement voter suppression laws and silence dissent in the Tennessee state legislature. [B]“It’s important to understand they’re not bodily functions. They’re not burping out random policies. They’re following their leader, who’s following the world’s most heinous authoritarians,” Wallace said. “And we showed you that to show you just how dangerous his rhetoric is.”[/B] “He’s such an idiot, on top of all else,” she later added. “And he sounds like such a bleepin’ idiot.” |
Re: Media Bias
[B] Dominion v. Fox News trial ends with last-minute settlement
[/B] [url]https://news.yahoo.com/live-updates-dominion-v-fox-news-defamation-trial-begins-090017576.html[/url] The highly anticipated trial in the defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News began and ended Tuesday with a last-minute settlement between the two parties. After a lengthy recess, Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis dismissed the jury and announced that the issue was "resolved." Dominion has accused the conservative cable news giant of knowingly, and repeatedly, broadcasting guests’ and hosts’ baseless allegations after the 2020 presidential election that Dominion’s voting machines were rigged to help Joe Biden steal the election from then-President Donald Trump. Fox News argued that it was simply reporting on the newsworthy voter fraud allegations that Trump and his allies were promoting in the wake of the election, and that the broadcasts in question should be protected under the First Amendment. There is no video feed of the proceedings but Yahoo News will be following the audio and giving you the latest updates below. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=Giantone;1340713][B] Dominion v. Fox News trial ends with last-minute settlement
[/B] [url]https://news.yahoo.com/live-updates-dominion-v-fox-news-defamation-trial-begins-090017576.html[/url] The highly anticipated trial in the defamation lawsuit brought by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News began and ended Tuesday with a last-minute settlement between the two parties. After a lengthy recess, Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis dismissed the jury and announced that the issue was "resolved." Dominion has accused the conservative cable news giant of knowingly, and repeatedly, broadcasting guests’ and hosts’ baseless allegations after the 2020 presidential election that Dominion’s voting machines were rigged to help Joe Biden steal the election from then-President Donald Trump. Fox News argued that it was simply reporting on the newsworthy voter fraud allegations that Trump and his allies were promoting in the wake of the election, and that the broadcasts in question should be protected under the First Amendment. There is no video feed of the proceedings but Yahoo News will be following the audio and giving you the latest updates below.[/quote] I was looking forward to seeing what came out in the trial. This story will disappear by tomorrow. |
Re: Media Bias
[quote=mooby;1340717]I was looking forward to seeing what came out in the trial. This story will disappear by tomorrow.[/quote]
I was wishing the same. FOX should have been made to admit their lies! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.