Re: Pro-gun article
 

maybe even here ...


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cb2UjmF-Rc]Officer in 'fight for life' before shooting - YouTube[/ame]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

and again .


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1gYEG1TzBk][RAW/HQ] Oregon State Police Video Captures Fatal Freeway Shooting - YouTube[/ame]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

None of those situations needed a military grade vehicle to solve.

Good, efficient tactics would suffice.

You are part of the problem, GiantOne. It's possible that you're even paid to post such utter nonsense.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1068088]None of those situations needed a military grade vehicle to solve.

Good, efficient tactics would suffice.

You are part of the problem, GiantOne. It's possible that you're even paid to post such utter nonsense.[/quote]


Paid ,no .I just get a little miffed when someone with out a clue such as yourself acts like the know all and see all about something he hasn't a clue about .If you are really interest in knowing what the problem is ,look at those video's again, then look in a mirror .

You base your opinion on far less than I ever base my opinion, as shown by your posts, which invariably are nothing more than distractions to the point. You should probably not post anymore, but where would the fun be in that?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1068099]Paid ,no .I just get a little miffed when someone with out a clue such as yourself acts like the know all and see all about something he hasn't a clue about .If you are really interest in knowing what the problem is ,look at those video's again, then look in a mirror .[/quote]


If I'm correct, RR has been in the military and my guess is he's familiar with all sorts of armored vehicles and military grade weapons, yet you sit there and say he doesn't have a clue? Interesting.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=NC_Skins;1068141]If I'm correct, RR has been in the military and my guess is he's familiar with all sorts of armored vehicles and military grade weapons, yet you sit there and say he doesn't have a clue? Interesting.[/quote]

So in not one of your post do you question the intelligence of someone in the profession of what ever you seem to disagree with ,interesting ?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1068099]Paid ,no .I just get a little miffed when someone with out a clue such as yourself acts like the know all and see all about something he hasn't a clue about .If you are really interest in knowing what the problem is ,look at those video's again, then look in a mirror .[/quote]

so, in the video you posted, where one guy gets out of the car during a traffic stop, and shoots the officer, how would a swat team, or military grade equipment have changed that? Are you suggesting that we now have armored Humvees handling all traffic stops?

Remember to stay on point, you posted a video which you claim shows the need militarized equipment. That is what I am asking you to explain.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

Stop feeding the troll, especially since from what I observe the troll is a woman in her 80's that votes Democrat 100% of the time and parrots everything her party stands for. She is so annoying all of her family has long since disowned her, but some how you guys keep her alive. Ignore her, she will no longer have a purpose to live and will die.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

But she's our gimp.....

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1068148]

Remember to stay on point, you posted a video which you claim shows the need militarized equipment. That is what I am asking you to explain.[/quote]

You don't think extra armor in the car(doors ,panels) would help ,bullet proof glass wouldn't help ?What I do find funny is I must stay on point your teenage buddies do not .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=NC_Skins;1068141]If I'm correct, RR has been in the military and my guess is he's familiar with all sorts of armored vehicles and military grade weapons, yet you sit there and say he doesn't have a clue? Interesting.[/quote]


This coming from someone who cries about his fellow workers and post pics of them on the internet so they get in trouble yet we don't know if that pic might have been you ?.As for RR he is an internet BH with no proof other than his say so ,RR and BB both probably still live at home and are 62 ,with food stamps and social security .:joecool:

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Buffalo Bob;1068153]Stop feeding the troll, especially since from what I observe the troll is a woman in her 80's that votes Democrat 100% of the time and parrots everything her party stands for. She is so annoying all of her family has long since disowned her, but some how you guys keep her alive. Ignore her, she will no longer have a purpose to live and will die.[/quote]


I think maybe you should ignore me, 4,656 posts pretty sure I'm not going anywhere .

[QUOTE=Giantone;1068178]You don't think extra armor in the car(doors ,panels) would help ,bullet proof glass wouldn't help ?What I do find funny is I must stay on point your teenage buddies do not .[/QUOTE]

Extra armor would likely weigh down a normal patrol car, reducing effectiveness in traffic stops. Bulletproof glass sure. But neither of those are about the militarization of the police that you said your videos were proved the need for.
The militarization discussed was about ied proof troop carriers, swat team capabilities in small cities (not large ones named LA or New York).

Just showing a video of a cop being shot, while tragic, isn't proof of a need for military urban attack vehicles.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1068193]Extra armor would likely weigh down a normal patrol car, reducing effectiveness in traffic stops. Bulletproof glass sure. But neither of those are about the militarization of the police that you said your videos were proved the need for.
The militarization discussed was about ied proof troop carriers, swat team capabilities in small cities (not large ones named LA or New York).

Just showing a video of a cop being shot, while tragic, isn't proof of a need for military urban attack vehicles.[/quote]

While I respect it ,that is your opinion .I disagree .