Re: Pro-gun article
 

Bloomberg wastes more more. Good.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

I've just added a Kimber .45 ACP

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/1514598_269100226605684_8182265267553837635_n.jpg[/IMG]

The difference is surprising.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10262146_388935307912271_4276079815128225054_n.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1068529]I've just added a Kimber .45 ACP

[IMG]http://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/1514598_269100226605684_8182265267553837635_n.jpg[/IMG]

The difference is surprising.[/quote]

Hopefully you can get ammo or don't shoot much. Everything I need they are always out of and I refuse to hang out in the parking lot on delivery day like a lot of people do. As long as a Democrat is in the White House the panic buying and high prices won't stop. Maybe I should start looking what ammo is always on the shelf and buy a gun to fit that.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=XNcRJY0mQPOBJM&tbnid=gI_jC7gkEo_ILM:&ved=0CAgQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcognidissidence.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fguns-dont-kill-people-people-kill-people.html&ei=qlxQU-r-J8eiyASBg4KQBg&psig=AFQjCNGrCekqgTuEmh6zoPFWf7b52gW1bg&ust=1397861930707756"][IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MUuKSVGqupM/UNaW2RjO8mI/AAAAAAAAK8Y/KOYxLkancco/s1600/guns+don't+kill+people.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265297/Five-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html]Five people wounded in accidental shootings at THREE different gun and knife shows | Mail Online[/url]


[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=MC-g_RY6RDXD3M&tbnid=CL4ptwjNu5mTXM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-2265297%2FFive-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html&ei=K15QU8abJIGwyQGitYHoAQ&psig=AFQjCNESo7rIHb6RA5pKjvU4ksnea9bUCw&ust=1397862313779378"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTMJD8t2b4D0D72-4CqCRA49JPNef8F4EtCK_3oI_ZNQ6RZFPpS[/IMG][/URL]

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1068617][url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265297/Five-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html]Five people wounded in accidental shootings at THREE different gun and knife shows | Mail Online[/url]


[URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=MC-g_RY6RDXD3M&tbnid=CL4ptwjNu5mTXM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-2265297%2FFive-people-wounded-accidental-shootings-THREE-different-gun-knife-shows.html&ei=K15QU8abJIGwyQGitYHoAQ&psig=AFQjCNESo7rIHb6RA5pKjvU4ksnea9bUCw&ust=1397862313779378"][IMG]https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTMJD8t2b4D0D72-4CqCRA49JPNef8F4EtCK_3oI_ZNQ6RZFPpS[/IMG][/URL][/quote]
Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1068620]Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.[/quote]


Not a troll , the voice of reason to a small group of very unreasonable posters.
As I have said before I respect your opinion but I disagree .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1068525]Bloomberg wastes more more. Good.[/quote]


Not a waste ,an investment .

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1068616][URL="http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&docid=XNcRJY0mQPOBJM&tbnid=gI_jC7gkEo_ILM:&ved=0CAgQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcognidissidence.blogspot.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fguns-dont-kill-people-people-kill-people.html&ei=qlxQU-r-J8eiyASBg4KQBg&psig=AFQjCNGrCekqgTuEmh6zoPFWf7b52gW1bg&ust=1397861930707756"][IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MUuKSVGqupM/UNaW2RjO8mI/AAAAAAAAK8Y/KOYxLkancco/s1600/guns+don't+kill+people.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/quote]Glad there's signs that once in awhile you can think clearly. Though I think the poster maker didn't understand the subject matter any more than you do. This could be good. Broken clock, and all.

Re.the overall poster: So no blanket gun bans, gun restrictions, or gun taxes? Because you're not so stupid you're pissed at guns? Good.

Re.1: Mandatory safety programs? Particularly if the government pays for them, this is very good. From teaching kids NOT to play with guns, to youth and adult handling and shooting training, a one time course would be good. Maybe offer it in high school. The only tricky part is "mandatory". No permanent gun registration should be kept, just records that a person has taken the course, should be good for background checks. And the safety courses must not be restrictively priced high or scarce to find, like the shenanigans DC pulled [URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/guns/2012/feb/8/miller-emily-got-her-gun/"]here[/URL]. Edit: You know what, still too vulnerable to government abuse, and tying classes to the right to bear arms is unconstitutional. Best thing to do would be to make it a one-time mandatory class in elementary school, and highschool, a requirement for graduation.

Re.2: Depends what you mean by "more thorough background checks". Enforcing existing laws better would be start.

Re.3: Depends of what the definitions of "negligence" laws, like simply having a gun that's not locked in a safe, are a no-go. Tougher penalties on brandishing, using guns like Joe Biden recommended, etc., criminal misuse of guns, would be good though.

So... glad to see some people coming around, I guess?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=Giantone;1068624]Not a waste ,an investment .[/quote]

You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

[IMG]https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10291815_725474554142000_5812638217245711089_n.jpg[/IMG]

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1068925]You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?[/quote]

Comprehension has never been your strong point ,Thank you for reminding us .

Why bother posting when you have nothing to say? You just confirm your idiocy.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

Re: Pro-gun article
 

[quote=RedskinRat;1068925]You should REALLY check what you're agreeing with before you blindly follow.

[IMG]https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/10291815_725474554142000_5812638217245711089_n.jpg[/IMG]

This poster sums up how anti-gunners think. Anyone else amused by it?[/quote]

More like it shows how much most of them know about guns showing a shell casing flying out of a barrel.

Exactly! If the fundamental understanding of firearms is so limited it's no surprise anti-gun people are terrified.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk