Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224581]Not even close ,Sellers ..Peter Sellers right?:)[/quote]

You're going to wish he was on Sunday, cos you won't be laughing at the way he smashed your D around.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224577]2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ?[/quote]

you lost to the colts and tried very hard to lose the the eagles (who flat out out-choked you), an then got routed by the seahawks (who, by the way, have never beaten the skins in the regular season, as in, EVER).

we're coming off two near 500 yard games, and pushing the jag around.

it'll be a shoot out, and brunell didn't get touched last game, so it doesn't really matter if he can take hits unless you get to him. jansen owns strahan.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=hesscl34;224583]We use Sellers as a TE.....[/quote]

if by TE you mean FB.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=That Guy;224586]if by TE you mean FB.[/quote]

same differnece... haha..... Looks the same on TV anyway... :)

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=That Guy;224585]you lost to the colts and tried very hard to lose the the eagles (who flat out out-choked you), an then got routed by the seahawks (who, by the way, have never beaten the skins in the regular season, as in, EVER).

we're coming off two near 500 yard games, and pushing the jag around.

it'll be a shoot out, and brunell didn't get touched last game, so it doesn't really matter if he can take hits unless you get to him. jansen owns strahan.[/quote]

You better check your stats from the first game last year.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

In that case so do Jimmy Choo's and Manolo Blahnik's....<ZING>

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224591]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/quote]

It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224577]2 of the int's were off the recievers .Brunell can't take the hits.Lets not forget what team has played who ?[/quote]

Brunell can't take hits? ... WRONG. He proved he can take plenty in the first two games!!!!! AND then come back and kick ass!

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=RedskinRat;224593]It's about 'Now' not 'Then'. We're so much better a team, you'll hardly recognize us.

Well, you [B][I]really[/I][/B] won't recognize us through your hands over your eyes.[/quote]


Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224602]Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:[/quote]

Not my statement so I have no need to defend it.

I'd rather make a blind faith statement. Much more fun.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

... because strahan is gay :doh:

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=GhettoDogAllStars;224609]... because strahan is gay :doh:[/quote]

Well, actually he's [B][I][U]not[/U][/I][/B] but his boyfriend is.......

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224591]You better check your stats from the first game last year.[/quote]

you REALLY need to check the stats from the second game last year.

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

Have we reached the acceptable threshold to begin highjack?

Re: I know this is pointless but
 

[quote=Giantone;224602]Really ,then how can Janson "own" Strahan when they haven't played NOW!:spank:[/quote]

:spank::smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:smashfrea:spank:


:doh: