Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

Someone please tell me this guy is drunk or something...lol
Ya know buddy, correct capitalization/spelling/grammar goes a long way in making your point. That post hurt my eyes to read it was so badly written...tighten up homie, tighten up...

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[QUOTE=JGisLordOfTheRings;227942]Someone please tell me this guy is drunk or something...lol
Ya know buddy, correct capitalization/spelling/grammar goes a long way in making your point. That post hurt my eyes to read it was so badly written...tighten up homie, tighten up...[/QUOTE]

Thank you. I was afraid of saying anything about that because I thought he'd go racial on me for mentioning his bad grammer. Hey, BMF, if you want people to respect your opinion on this board you need to understand two things. First your posts should be legible so that people can understand what you are trying to say and second, you have to respect the fact that other people don't always agree with you. If you can't do that then this isn't the place for you.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=BMF21;227941]Its overrated to try to compare any Black QB to a white QB[/quote]

You're the one making this a race issue. Nobody is comparing colors, we're comparing styles of QB. Vick is a great athlete and nobody is denying his impact, the Falcons are a much better team with him than without him.

We're talking about whether he's a good QB or not, and sorry he just doesn't have the passing skills that the majority of the league has.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

It is impossible to discuss McNabb or Vick without someone going THERE.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=70Chip;227965]It is impossible to discuss McNabb or Vick without someone going THERE.[/quote]

I don't care if McNabb is black yellow green or purple. He is the general on two of my fantasy teams and in my opinion he is the best QB in the league.

Yes, even better than Manning. If McNabb had the EDGE, Harrison and Wayne he would probably have multiple rings right now.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=Grim21Reaper;227967]I don't care if McNabb is black yellow green or purple. He is the general on two of my fantasy teams and in my opinion he is the best QB in the league.

Yes, even better than Manning. If McNabb had the EDGE, Harrison and Wayne he would probably have multiple rings right now.[/quote]

And if I were married to Eva Longoria, I could get into Hollywood parties. I really wish these Eagle fans would choose the appropriate avatar.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=70Chip;227968]And if I were married to Eva Longoria, I could get into Hollywood parties. I really wish these Eagle fans would choose the appropriate avatar.[/quote]

If you ever call me an Eagles fan again I will track you down. Just because I can actually judge talent on an objective basis you insult me.

Do you want to meet somewhere before the game tomorrow?

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=Grim21Reaper;227969]If you ever call me an Eagles fan again I will track you down.[/quote]


Withdrawn.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

If you were to rate Eagles fans vs. the general population I would say they come out somewhere between petty criminal and habitual felon.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

snow fright? who's the racist now?

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[QUOTE=FRPLG;227213]I think 21 CAN cover almost any WR in the league. IF he was playing straight coverage. His problem is that he has to play coverage and run. Against any decent 1 or even 2 in this league heaping the responsibility on one guy makes it pretty easy to pop open. If he lined up at CB he'd be a pretty decent corner. But he can't do both well at the same time. It isn't physically possible to protect against the run while staying in coverage against a guy like Burress.[/QUOTE]

I think Redskins21's coverage skills are a little suspect. Look back to the Giants game for the move Buress put on him when they were one on one. Dallas31's coverage skills are even more suspect.

However, Dallas 31 has much better hands and so makes INTs more regularly. In that regard, he and Ed Reed are the best in the league.

While both are excellent against the run, Redskins21 simply has a gift of forcing fumbles from RBs. If they had an annual award for the best fumble forcer in the league, 21 would win hands down.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=Mattyk72;227964]You're the one making this a race issue. Nobody is comparing colors, we're comparing styles of QB. Vick is a great athlete and nobody is denying his impact, the Falcons are a much better team with him than without him.

We're talking about whether he's a good QB or not, and sorry he just doesn't have the passing skills that the majority of the league has.[/quote]

and his passing skill along dosent make a good QB, you said it, his impact on the game......that position is changing......year by year, and isnt the majority of the league more white QB's.....than any other

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

MOS DEF

21 has a true god given gift for stripping that ball from the RB no matter who they are....now recovering that fumble going our way is what we need to work on

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

[quote=NY_Skinsfan;227959]Thank you. I was afraid of saying anything about that because I thought he'd go racial on me for mentioning his bad grammer. Hey, BMF, if you want people to respect your opinion on this board you need to understand two things. First your posts should be legible so that people can understand what you are trying to say and second, you have to respect the fact that other people don't always agree with you. If you can't do that then this isn't the place for you.[/quote]

how about this............ Sure whatever you say.

Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?
 

Yes.
Sure.
Whatever.
WE SAY.

LOL