Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=gibbsisgod;330431]No offense D L but your first 2 post were pretty much meaningless.I hope that isn't a sign of things to come. Nowhere to go but up I guess.


Anyways, welcome! Go skins![/QUOTE]

meaningless huh? oh sorry for that.....i didn't know people cared more about the life of their dogs than the lives over in iraq....but i guess if you don't see it than no harm huh.........sorry but i disagree with you, ain't nowhere to go but down from here buddy

its funny how americans thinking pattern goes when it comes to pets......if only we thought the same way for humans....thanxs for the welcome anyway, go skins!!

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[quote=Dirty_Landry;330437]meaningless huh? oh sorry for that.....i didn't know people cared more about the life of their dogs than the lives over in iraq....but i guess if you don't see it than no harm huh.........sorry but i disagree with you, ain't nowhere to go but down from here buddy

its funny how americans thinking pattern goes when it comes to pets......if only we thought the same way for humans....thanxs for the welcome anyway, go skins!![/quote]


welcome D.L.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=Dirty_Landry;330437]meaningless huh? oh sorry for that.....i didn't know people cared more about the life of their dogs than the lives over in iraq....but i guess if you don't see it than no harm huh.........sorry but i disagree with you, ain't nowhere to go but down from here buddy

its funny how americans thinking pattern goes when it comes to pets......if only we thought the same way for humans....thanxs for the welcome anyway, go skins!![/QUOTE]

I don't think you understood at all what GibbsisGod was trying to say. No one is discrediting the value of human life. But allegations against Vick have nothing to do with sending an army to war. It was an inappropriate and irrelevant analogy. Then your second post was about the FBI and CIA being scum. Not a good start.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[quote=Dirty_Landry;330427]i don't believe a word a fed or cia agent says....there all scum[/quote]

Well, at least in your short time here you've shown that you're not prone to unqualified, blanket generalizations or anything.

And it's "they're." Just figured you'd like to know the grammatically correct way to insult an entire group of people.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[quote=SmootSmack;330455]I don't think you understood at all what GibbsisGod was trying to say. No one is discrediting the value of human life. But allegations against Vick have nothing to do with sending an army to war. It was an inappropriate and irrelevant analogy. Then your second post was about the FBI and CIA being scum. Not a good start.[/quote]
I'll agree with that. If you want to bring politics into this then take it to the parking lot where politics is fine.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=skinsWill;330435] He is so screwed, if he wants to see the feild again he will be singing about everything he knows, cooperating with his deal that the feds might offer him.[/QUOTE]

I don't get it, who will Vick be "singing" on? Does Vick answer to someone else? Let's face it here folks, Vick it the "big cheese" here in this case. He is the one that the Fed's are really looking to take down. He is the one that funded the whole operation. If anything the others are the one that are gonna do the singing on Vick... You know things like it was his idea and what not...

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[quote=Redskins8588;330465]I don't get it, who will Vick be "singing" on? Does Vick answer to someone else? Let's face it here folks, Vick it the "big cheese" here in this case. He is the one that the Fed's are really looking to take down. He is the one that funded the whole operation. If anything the others are the one that are gonna do the singing on Vick... You know things like it was his idea and what not...[/quote]


Well in the indictment it lists names of [B]MANY other kennels in MANY other states[/B]... dont you think if the feds could get the "Big Cheese" Vick to start naming names and locations as to where the MANY other rings are still operating to save his own ass? im sure they would be more than willing to offer a deal for the information that could potentially stop other dog fighting operations in 5 different states.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=skinsWill;330466]Well in the indictment it lists names of [B]MANY other kennels in MANY other states[/B]... dont you think if the feds could get the "Big Cheese" Vick to start naming names and locations as to where the MANY other rings are still operating to save his own ass? im sure they would be more than willing to offer a deal for the information that could potentially stop other dog fighting operations in 5 different states.[/QUOTE]

Who's to say that Vick isn't the "big cheese"?
This whole thing makes me sick, someone has to have a seriously black heart to do this, I hope he never plays football again.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

Grim,

I'm not exactly sure why you seem to get emotional whenever someone utters Vick's name. Just because he hasn't been convicted, it doesn't necessarily follow that we cannot speculate about his moral fiber. We're not sitting on the jury and he will get his "due process."

PS - Nice that you refer to the dogs that Vick allegedly killed as those "stinkin' dogs."

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

all the fame but doen,t want the glory......what a waste he has become and it,s a shame.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=skinsWill;330466]Well in the indictment it lists names of [B]MANY other kennels in MANY other states[/B]... dont you think if the feds could get the "Big Cheese" Vick to start naming names and locations as to where the MANY other rings are still operating to save his own ass? im sure they would be more than willing to offer a deal for the information that could potentially stop other dog fighting operations in 5 different states.[/QUOTE]

Why would the feds give the option only to Vick to rat out the other operations? Why wouldn't they pressure Vicks cronies into releasing the information? That way the feds not only take down Vick, but also get the other kennels. I am sure that Vick isn't the only one that can start naming names and locations...

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

The sad part of this is that kids do look up to these guys. Vick came from the projects and how many kids have watch him become a star and had dreams of becoming a football player like Vick. My nephew started going to his first football games when Vick was playing VT and he became a hugh fan of Vicks. I cannot even count the stuff he has had signed by Vick as a VT player and a couple of things from Atlanta. Now he is thinking that he needs to take down all his Vick stuff because of what he has done. I talked to him last night and he said even if Vick does not get charged he cannot ever support him again. I asked my sister if he did not decide to take down his Vick stuff would she make him? Right now she has not decided.

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=birdz4gibbs;330490]all the fame but doen,t want the glory......what a waste he has become and it,s a shame.[/QUOTE]

Seriously, you gotta start using apostrophes correctly. This is kind of an eye sore

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[quote=Grim21Reaper;330209]Anyone who thinks that Vick will do time over this, don't hold your breath or you will end up in the dirt like those stinkin' dogs.

I am sure that their star witnesses are upstanding citizens. Probably guys who have been busted for drugs or lost their family members money betting on the wrong dog.

Now, he may get suspended, but he will do 0 that is z e r o time.

Now the fact that Goodell would be out of line for him suspending a first time offender over this is a completely different argument.[/quote]

Not sure what you have against dogs dude?

Vick is no first time offender. He's done in the NFL this year and maybe more......

Re: Grand Jury Indicts Vick
 

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;330499]Seriously, you gotta start using apostrophes correctly. This is kind of an eye sore[/QUOTE]what,s the problem? I,d say that there isn,t a problem with his typing. i,d say that it,s you that seems to have the problem. Why aren,t you nicer to the new guy? what,s your deal?