Commanders Post at The Warpath - Looking ahead to the Saints

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)

- Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - Looking ahead to the Saints (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=25062)

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=GMScud;474138]Did you just "son" the administrator of this website? :doh: 4 letter words thrown into the middle of an otherwise intelligent post is ok. You sound like a moron. The inmates don't run the asylum here. Son.[/quote]

He probably didn't know Matty was admin.

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=DynamiteRave;474150]He probably didn't know Matty was admin.[/quote]

Yeah, how could he? It only says "Administrator" in all caps next to his name. ;)

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=KWilly_2003;474135]Tone it down? Dude you need to mind your own business, lol I've seen people throw 4 letter words and things around on here. What I'm doing is childs play. So you tone it down, you're not my pops son.[/quote]

You should have noticed I was trying to give you some advice as a moderator, but I suppose it's understandable...but you definitely should have noticed Matty was giving you advice as the site's administrator. Advice you should have taken

Sad, just sad. I should ban you, but I think Matty deserve the honor of doing this one himself

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=KWilly_2003;474135]Tone it down? Dude you need to mind your own business, lol I've seen people throw 4 letter words and things around on here. What I'm doing is childs play. So you tone it down, you're not my pops son.[/quote]

KWilly I'm sure you are new to this site just as I am, so maybe you did'nt realize that Matty is the administrator of this site and ( I think) has the power to take you out of here. Hopefully he'll take that into consideration and give you a break. There was nothing wrong with the way he asked you to tone it down. Maybe in the future (If there is one for you here) you will just take his advice...son.

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=SmootSmack;474154]Sad, just sad. I should ban you, but I think Matty deserve the honor of doing this one himself[/quote]

R.I.P. KWilly_2003 he was a stubborn son of a gun:Flush:

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=Redskin Warrior;474166]R.I.P. KWilly_2003 he was a stubborn son of a gun:Flush:[/quote]

That was too funny:laughing2

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;473937]I watched the entire Saints-Bucs game and they looked pretty damned impressive. Their d-line (Charles Grant, Sedrick Ellis, Brian Young and Will Smith) was absolutely dominating Jeff Garcia and the Bucs offense, which also runs the WCO. Jeff Garcia had no time to throw the ball and was getting hurried on just about every throw. If our O-line can't stop the Saints' pass rush, Jason Campbell is in for a long day.[/quote]
That is scary when you consider that Garcia is a season WCO guy who has been in that system his entire career and JC is just starting it.

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=SmootSmack;474154]You should have noticed I was trying to give you some advice as a moderator, but I suppose it's understandable...but you definitely should have noticed Matty was giving you advice as the site's administrator. Advice you should have taken

Sad, just sad. I should ban you, but I think Matty deserve the honor of doing this one himself[/quote]

Smoot you must love smellin booty, cause you alway got to stick ya nose into something..always messin with folks... Take a break from ya computer every now and then... go outside..make out with something.... CHill dude!!

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=Lotus;473997]I saw the whole NO/TB game and came away with a different impression. The Saints offense looked hot. But it actually did not do a whole lot if you take out the big plays. That is, the Skins need to make the Saints offense earn its yards, rather than getting big plays, and everything will be ok.

I was unimpressed by the NO defense. They did get some good pressure on Garcia. But Tampa was still able to move the ball well. This was due in part because Tampa averaged over 7 yards per rush. Hello Clinton Portis![/quote]

sorry but you must not tune in for a lot of saints games. the saints offense is built around alot of short quick passes and 3-5 yard runs. the saints have alot of drives where they keep hitting, and hitting, and hitting, then they hit you with the knockout punch on a 30+ yard touchdown.

the saints offense struggled at times in the first half, but they made adjustments and got shockey involved in the second half. they looked like the saints offense that i'm used too seeing. i'd expect too see alot more of the saints moving the ball this weekend. no disrepect too your team, but yall don't have the d tampa has.

the saints d got alot of good pressure on garcia all day. they only brought him down twice but they were in his face all day and forced him too use his legs too make plays. garcia completed around 58% of his passes. and he threw the ball 41 times, so the saints d were able to force him too throw the ball. the saints corners were glued onto the bucs recievers alot throughout the day and the bucs recievers made a couple plays. but the most important thing, and the thing im most proud of is that the saints defense were able to make plays when needed. the bucs o was 0-9 on 3rd down conversion going into the 4th quarter. they finished 2-12. and as for the running game the numbers were not reflected on the way the saints stopped the run. they played good but gave up two plays, one being a 46 yarder. as i said earlier in this thread, that's what scares me. they will hold the opposing rusher too a 3 yard average the entire game but will then give up a huge 30+ yard carry.

the saints bit themselves alot in this game. 6 penaltys in the first half. a olinemen missed his block on that interception play and if that would not have happended that play could have been a potential touchdown because there was nothing but green in front of moore. i would put my money on the saints getting something from that drive. nobody knows what would have actually happened, but that would have made it a 31-13 saints win, if my maths right lol.

and one of the things i'm most excited about is that deuce or aaron stecker never saw the field, our two top recievers only caught 4 passes, shockey didn't really get involved until the 3rd or 4th quarter. and the saints leader in the secondary, mike mckenzie, didn't dress. nor did the other starting corner usama young.

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=oldhog44;474262]Smoot you must love smellin booty, cause you alway got to stick ya nose into something..always messin with folks... Take a break from ya computer every now and then... go outside..make out with something.... CHill dude!![/quote]

What?

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

we need a great effort out of all three ,the offense/defense/special teams to win and being our home opener that will help too hopefully.

no turnovers and protect the balland be aggressive on offense/defense.

Re: Looking ahead to the Saints

[quote=hooskins;474268]A couple 4 letter words and you will be joining kwill 2003.[/quote]

He gets upset when the mods don't just let the inmates run the asylum. It bothered him when I told someone (can't remember who) we already had a UDFA thread and didn't need another. I suppose it bothered him when I asked him yesterday what was the point of his "I hope we don't go 0-5" thread. And now he's agitated that we didn't let Willy roam free on this site. He's fighting for the common man, it's so noble.