Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

I am starting to believe JC is the problem with the offense again. I just cant believe our recievers are the reason our offense has performed so bad. Where ever you have a good QB the recievers follow. I hope he starts to prove me wrong, just in time for the playoffs, but he has got me worried again.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

$10 says that someone's head is going to spin 360 degrees and spit pea soup as soon as they see this thread has been bumped.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

:doh::doh:

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

oooo-line

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=T.O.Killa;506012]I am starting to believe JC is the problem with the offense again. I just cant believe our recievers are the reason our offense has performed so bad. Where ever you have a good QB the recievers follow. I hope he starts to prove me wrong, just in time for the playoffs, but he has got me worried again.[/quote]So...you were wrong twice, but you're right now?

I agree that if Campbell was seeing everything, he would be making the receivers look good, but just because he isn't doesn't mean he's the big problem.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=GTripp0012;506018]So...you were wrong twice, but you're right now?[/quote]

Please see my sig.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;506022]Please see my sig.[/quote]

I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? :doh: I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=DynamiteRave;506023]I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? :doh: I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..[/quote]

I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;506025]I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.[/quote]

Oh yeah. I know. I'm just bitching about how I don't know why anyone would want that.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;506025]I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.[/quote]

He is NOT our problem. First off, there were some AWFUL drops today, not to mention he's been harassed in the pocket all season.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

The jury is still out on Campbell but he has shown enough progression this season to give him a break for now.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=hooskins;506037]here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?[/quote]

Crazy talk.

Bring in the next guy, if he doesn't turn out to be the next Brady or Manning by halfway through next season, toss him on the scrap heap too.

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!

Re: JC is not what I thought part two
 

[quote=GTripp0012;506044]When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?![/quote]

When you lose, you don't have any heart.

When you win, you've got mad heart.