![]() |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
Dallas Sartz. No THERE'S a name I haven't heard in a while. Nice memory.
|
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880554]Agreed. [B]I'm taking credit for an assist though[/B].[/quote]
And in less than three paragraphs!!! Double Win!!! (Not that I have much room to mock when it comes to brevity ...) |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880554]Agreed. I'm taking credit for an assist though.[/quote]
Dude you kind of have to get a life outside of football, it is kind of sad the amount energy you put into it. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
You're right to an extent mredskins, but who would really think this is sad? The people who would love to invest as much time into a hobby as I am fortunate to be able to? I'm the lucky one.
|
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880638]You're right to an extent mredskins, but who would really think this is sad? The people who would love to invest as much time into a hobby as I am fortunate to be able to? I'm the lucky one.[/quote]
If you say so, who am I to judge. To add and not to be mean but I used to read your post but of late (like the past year or so) you are so long winded and not to the point, I hardly bother to read anything you posted. You kind of suffer from diarrhea of the mouth. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
eh thats a lil harsh mreskins. Tripp even when i disagree your opinion is value added. I think you get lil too wrapped up in stats, lose sight of big picture, but its all good.
|
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
Normally, I'd drop a "thanks for reading!" here, but in light of mredskins, I think I'll have to amend that to just "thanks!" ;)
|
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880648]Normally, I'd drop a "thanks for reading!" here, but in light of mredskins, I think I'll have to amend that to just "thanks!" ;)[/quote]
Perfect! |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
GTripp lemme throw you some love, your in depth analysis is pretty great. I especially love when you go over the game tape and tell how many times our linemen screwed up, because that's stuff you don't catch during live action.
I tend to be long winded myself, it's a trait often associated with highly analytical and detailed people. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but it's clear you put a ton of thought into it, and all you need sometimes is to message yourself more concisely. It would make your analysis even more powerful. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=Schneed10;880653]GTripp lemme throw you some love, your in depth analysis is pretty great. I especially love when you go over the game tape and tell how many times our linemen screwed up, because that's stuff you don't catch during live action.
I tend to be long winded myself, it's a trait often associated with highly analytical and detailed people. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but it's clear you put a ton of thought into it, [B]and all you need sometimes is to message yourself more concisely[/B]. It would make your analysis even more powerful.[/quote]That was the lesson I got out of this thread, presented by SmootSmack. I had never considered trying to do rebuttals in Twitter form, but sometimes entities need to see new ideas in action before they see the error in their ways. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880655]That was the lesson I got out of this thread, presented by SmootSmack. I had never considered trying to do rebuttals in Twitter form, but sometimes entities need to see new ideas in action before they see the error in their ways.[/quote]
Right on. I agree with Schneed. Your analysis, particularly the game tape breakdowns, lend great value to this message board. But I think a lot of the time- and this thread is a perfect example- less is more. I think your points might carry a lot more weight if they are made in a more succinct fashion. I can tell you for sure members around here are much more likely to read every word of a 100 word post than they are a 500 word post. And that fact alone will get your points across to more people. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;880577]Dallas Sartz. No THERE'S a name I haven't heard in a while. Nice memory.[/quote]
Oh oh. I love this game. Lets see. Robert McCune, Darerius McCants, Ifeanyi Ohalete, Joe Salavea, Lamar Marshall, Warrick Holdman, Ryan Boschetti. So many role players and never weres forgotten in the blink of an eye. |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
Brevity is the soul of wit
|
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=SmootSmack;880662]Brevity is the soul of wit[/quote]
Based on careful analysis of this thread, I think Smoot just called GTripp witless. Maybe a little harsh, eh? |
Re: How Scouting College Players Has Evolved Under Shanahan
[quote=GTripp0012;880655]That was the lesson I got out of this thread, presented by SmootSmack. I had never considered trying to do rebuttals in Twitter form, but sometimes entities need to see new ideas in action before they see the error in their ways.[/quote]
Intervention is useful......but never pretty |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.