Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=Chico23231;1195056][url=http://www.richmond.com/redskins-xtra/redskins-ota-observations-this-could-be-josh-doctson-s-year/article_ea57e402-6433-11e8-981b-07985d0e0a9f.html]Redskins OTA observations: This could be Josh Doctson's year | Redskins XTRA | richmond.com[/url]

Doctson getting some love.[/quote]

I will give him some love when he starts showing himself as a #1 receiver.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=Chico23231;1195052]Translation, Jason Garrett is a fuck boy[/quote]

Basically he's been Jerry's bitch for years. When he comes to work the first thing he does is gets Jerry's coffee. It's beyond gross. Garrett's balls are in the palm of Jerry's right hand.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1195020]Scandrick says "Coming to work here is more laid back, not micro managed like Dallas"[/quote]

We've known Gruden is not a fiery guy like, say, his brother. So far the results have been sloppy play early on, and collapses at the end of the year. I keep hoping each year he gets a bit better, but this really should be a make or break year for Gruden, injuries be damned.

9-7 with at least 1 playoff win should be the minimum for keeping him in my opinion (right now). I do believe we will go deep in the playoffs, because of AS, some good backup talent across the board, and what I hope will be a stifling defense.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

"Fuck boy"

That cracks me up, such a good one.

And I'm leading the Doctson Kool-Aid Club this season. Big year coming up. Yuuuge!

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1195076]We've known Gruden is not a fiery guy like, say, his brother. So far the results have been sloppy play early on, and collapses at the end of the year. I keep hoping each year he gets a bit better, but this really should be a make or break year for Gruden, injuries be damned.

9-7 with at least 1 playoff win should be the minimum for keeping him in my opinion (right now). I do believe we will go deep in the playoffs, because of AS, some good backup talent across the board, and what I hope will be a stifling defense.[/quote]

Gruden should be fired if we have the biblical level of injuries like we did last year?

Really?

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[QUOTE=DYoungJelly;1195112]Gruden should be fired if we have the biblical level of injuries like we did last year?

Really?[/QUOTE]Well legitimately if he had the same amount no, and he wouldn't be, but at the same token he had this year to find backups and see how the backups do so there's a part of it that says yes he should be more prepared for that level of injuries

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

If Jay Gruden's team doesn't make the playoffs this season he should only be given a two year contract extension or fired. The extension should be offered if he is thought to have done a good job but suffered through extremely difficult circumstances beyond his control. Otherwise, he should be fired.

Why? Because the job is to guide the team into the playoffs and have a chance to win a Super Bowl. In his four years as HC, he's only been in one playoff game and the Skins lost that one. Five years is enough time. After five years, it's time to try to find another HC who can get the job done.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1195127]If Jay Gruden's team doesn't make the playoffs this season he should only be given a two year contract extension or fired. The extension should be offered if he is thought to have done a good job but suffered through extremely difficult circumstances beyond his control. Otherwise, he should be fired.

Why? Because the job is to guide the team into the playoffs and have a chance to win a Super Bowl. In his four years as HC, he's only been in one playoff game and the Skins lost that one. Five years is enough time. After five years, it's time to try to find another HC who can get the job done.[/quote]

I was under the impression he received the 2 year extension last year....

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DenQ_hxWAAEy3xD.jpg:large[/IMG]

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=EdmundDorf;1195129]I was under the impression he received the 2 year extension last year....[/quote]

I don't know but the essential point is that it is time for him to return to the playoffs or leave. I just said the part about an extension in my attempt to appear to be a nice, reasonable man.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1195138][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DenQ_hxWAAEy3xD.jpg:large[/IMG][/quote]

These run blocking grades for the right side of our OL do not correlate with team rushing performance. Were our RB's bad last year or what? I already know our TE's didn't block well.

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1195141]These run blocking grades for the right side of our OL do not correlate with team rushing performance. Were our RB's bad last year or what? I already know our TE's didn't block well.[/quote]

I think Guice will prove that it was the fact that we didn't have a true RB1

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1195140]I don't know but the essential point is that it is time for him to return to the playoffs or leave. I just said the part about an extension in my attempt to appear to be a nice, reasonable man.[/QUOTE]



[emoji23]

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000935002/article/five-reasons-why-the-redskins-will-make-the-2018-nfl-playoffs?campaign=Twitter_atn]Five reasons why the Redskins will make the 2018 NFL playoffs - NFL.com[/url]

Re: Redskins OTAs
 

[URL="https://www.google.com/amp/s/redskinswire.usatoday.com/2018/05/26/alabama-product-cam-sims-big-plays-redskins-otas/amp/"]https://www.google.com/amp/s/redskinswire.usatoday.com/2018/05/26/alabama-product-cam-sims-big-plays-redskins-otas/amp/[/URL]

Cam Sims was impressive in OTA's