Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=CrustyRedskin;615438]We're gonna rally up and kick off in that Philly A$$!!!!!!!! Lets have a little positive attitude!!! Im tired of all this negativity!!! We are supposed to lose!!! But what if we win?? Itl be a shocker!! And thats why they play the game!!! Cant wait! Lets do this!! COme on Defense----Defense----Defense!!! Capital punish!! Make the feathers fly!! I still think Lewis will pull out some old Tecmo Bowl plays!!![/quote]

That's what's up!

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SouperMeister;615320]I agree with Casserly that Campbell is a square peg being forced into a round hole with the change to a WCO under Zorn. I've wondered how Campbell would have continued to progress in the Al Saunders system, for which his skills seem a much better fit. Joe Flacco is looking pretty damn good in that system with Cam Cameron and Saunders coaching him up.[/quote]

Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Mattyk72;613626]hater is just as dumb as kool aid drinker[/quote]
[IMG]http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Business/images/kool-aid-man.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

I hope everyone watched the BANG cartoon - flawed execution - it is hilarious!

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Buster;615199]Wow, I had NO IDEA Campbell was the person calling the stretch-left plays inside the 10 and running the ball in passing situations. I bet he's also the reason we're not trying fade routes to our tall WRs too!

Golly gee willikers...thanks for helping us understand this complipl...complloc...this hard football stuff! Glad someone here has fancy book-learnin'!


I'll update the stats again after the MNF game. Cutler laid another 3-interception rotten egg in the Bears' 45-10 beatdown by the Bengals and Sanchez was again mediocre as the Jets used the running game to the tune of 316 rushing yards to beat the Raiders.[/quote]

lol u mad

contrary to popular belief you don't have to score TD's just inside of the red zone... a few of these big passes that he's missing or never seeing could easily get us a score in the hands of thomas, kelly, etc

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;615453]Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.[/quote]

According to his Auburn's coach they altered the West Coast to suit JC's strengths

[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d81397a02&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true]Redskins' Campbell in tough spot following coaching shakeup[/url]

"Borges isn't buying that Campbell can't run the scheme because the West Coast system is what he ran at Auburn when Campbell blossomed. However, Borges said he tweaked the offense to take advantage of the powerful run game and Campbell's big arm. So, instead of dinking and dunking horizontally and relying on timing and receivers to make yards after the reception, Borges implemented more play-action and vertical passing.

"As much as we threw that underneath stuff, we could get it downfield," Borges said. "He could make all the throws; short, intermediate, deep. When he played in 2004, he played lights out. This kid threw almost 70 percent of his passes complete. What's phenomenal about it, his completions were over 10 yards an attempt. That's just not done. He's accurate. Matt Leinart won the Heisman at a 66 percent completion rate with a lower yards-per-catch."

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

Wow at this point people are still defending Campbell? Amazing.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

First off, lets count up his dumb ass decisions during games. Then lets look at the amount of times hes fumbled. Now, the interceptions, and while we are at it, how many fucking times does he have to bitch out and throw the fucking ball to the redskin fans in the stands??? Ya, our fans can catch better than Kelly and Randel El, but its not a completion.

Ok, now for this overblown statistic, which anyone who has actually watched the games this year can attest to. I guarantee that at least 35% of JC's passes are checkdowns, because he doesn't want to throw the ball downfield.......Checkdown, Checkdown, Checkdown, Checkdown.........JC is nothing more than an above average career backup, and its time these idiots running the team recognize this and start moving in another direction so our team can take a step towards achieving greatness, cause I can tell you right now, with JC at the helm, do not expect playoffs, and if you ever expect him to win a super bowl, you are just plain smoking some fuckin crack.

Oh, I forgot.......Why don't I ever see JC yelling at his team???? Getting pumped up????Getting his team motivated?????? Being a leader?????

I'll tell you why, cause he is a timid little pussified boy who cant take charge of a team, and you cant be timid in the NFL and be a leader. Bottom line.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;615453]Didn't he run "a version" of the West Coast offense in College? Seemed to do well enough there.

Maybe he's just confused because he's been in six different systems since he's been a pro...

There are a myriad of reasons the Redskins stink right now. Campbell may not be playing perfectly, but he's hardly the main reason for the 2-4 record.[/quote]In college players get 10 yards open, defensive schemes aren't typically as advanced, etc

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Zerohero;615471]Wow at this point people are still defending Campbell? Amazing.[/quote]

Not necessarily defending him, but I'm not going to agree with those that think he is the reason why this team is 2-4 though.

Right now this whole organization is a joke, and the problems are much greater than the starting quarterback.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;615504]Not necessarily defending him, but I'm not going to agree with those that think he is the reason why this team is 2-4 though.

Right now this whole organization is a joke, and the problems are much greater than the starting quarterback.[/quote]I'm done. I've been a Campbell apologist for the last 2 years. He lost me on the check down when he had Moss for a TD on the pump and go. Casserly's right. Campbell leaves huge plays on the field by checking down too early. Even worse, he has reverted to the fumbling turnover machine that he was two years ago. The protection has been adequate tonight. There have been plays to be made. I'm FINALLY willing to admit that Campbell probably never had "it".

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=SouperMeister;615936]I'm done. I've been a Campbell apologist for the last 2 years. He lost me on the check down when he had Moss for a TD on the pump and go. Casserly's right. Campbell leaves huge plays on the field by checking down too early. Even worse, he has reverted to the fumbling turnover machine that he was two years ago. The protection has been adequate tonight. There have been plays to be made. I'm FINALLY willing to admit that Campbell probably never had "it".[/quote]

McNabb left the same play on the field and he has been in the same offense for years. 6 sacks, no running still, and ARE turnover but JC is to blame.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=Green1;616597]McNabb left the same play on the field and he has been in the same offense for years. 6 sacks, no running still, and ARE turnover but JC is to blame.[/quote]

JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=warriorzpath;616606]JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.[/quote]

No running game. The Entire Oline needs replacing. So what is the answer T. Collins don't make me laugh

Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
 

[quote=warriorzpath;616606]JC IS TO BLAME. Steve Young on ESPN and the other analysts puts the focus on his bad game.[/quote]Steve Young was trying to blame the tip at the line INT on Campbell. Unfortunately, he couldn't think of a word long enough to defend that position.