Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

F- him. On 3rd and short, play action to the fullback. Everyone in the NFC east knows he'll be open every time.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[quote=scowan]I think we got the best years out of Lavar. He will never be as good as he was. Injuries and another new system to learn will limit him, no matter where he goes. Hey, if he goes to the G-men, good for him and I hope he gets a big contract. It will just tie up more of their money on a player that is over the hill.[/quote]Lavar is overated but over the hill might be a stretch.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

the G-men just signed brandon short, but I think he's an inside LB. Don't know if that will impact lavar signing

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

I think Lavar will be reborn with his new team. Whoever gets him will be glad they did.
But as far as Arrington finances are concerend. It's stating to look like he would have been better off taking our offer.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[quote=Redskins_P]No shit we heard it before. I posted this 2 weeks ago. Thanks for chiming in.[/quote]

You two: :argue: Me: :laughing2

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[QUOTE=amorentz]You two: :argue: Me: :laughing2[/QUOTE]


LOL.

I wasn't trying to argue at all. This thread has been going in since 4/4, and just now this guy comes in and says it old news?? No shit its old news...its from two weeks ago...

Check TAFKAS's signature. Those are words to live by.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[quote=Redskins_P]LOL.

I wasn't trying to argue at all. This thread has been going in since 4/4, and just now this guy comes in and says it old news?? No shit its old news...its from two weeks ago...

Check TAFKAS's signature. Those are words to live by.[/quote]

Haha yeah, I love his sig. He's a smart man...he even turned losing his username (after Smootie left) into a funny joke...I think there should be an informal competition (judged by me of course) to see who can create the best used-to-be-Lavar username.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[QUOTE=amorentz]Haha yeah, I love his sig. He's a smart man...he even turned losing his username (after Smootie left) into a funny joke...I think there should be an informal competition (judged by me of course) to see who can create the best used-to-be-Lavar username.[/QUOTE]

Let's give credit where credit is due on my sig. That came from the razor sharp wit of Cpayne the Brain. I took one of his posts and turned it into my sig. The weekly royalties that I have to pay to him are killing me though

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]Let's give credit where credit is due on my sig. That came from the razor sharp wit of Cpayne the Brain. I took one of his posts and turned it into my sig. The weekly royalties that I have to pay to him are killing me though[/QUOTE]
I'm gonna have to raise the rates when you start getting paychecks from Bristol, though.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[url]http://www.thewarpath.net/showpost.php?p=169607&postcount=8[/url]

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

accorsi's hometown has lost its idiot.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

Could retirement be an answer? Tell me that this article doesnt shadow Brandon Noble's situtation, maybe not quite as bad but definately shadows it. I dont know if you guys had noticed, but Lavar doesnt run like he used to. I think we got the best years out of him. Im sure hes going to continue to play, but I just feel better because I think we made the right choice in letting him loose. I no longer hold any grudge against Lavar.

[LEFT][B][FONT=Georgia]GIANTS EYEBALL LAVAR'S KNEE[/FONT][/B]
[FONT=Georgia]We're hearing that the "physical" taken by free-agent linebacker LaVar Arrington with the Giants was, in reality, an MRI on his knee.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]There's been talk around the league for much of the last year that Arrington's knee contains no cartilage, making him a potential candidate for microfracture surgery if he can't tolerate bone-on-bone contact over the long haul.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]We don't know for a fact whether Arrington is actually missing all of the cartilage in his knee, and we'll defer to the expert opinions of any of the licensed physcians who review the results of the MRI or otherwise inspect Arrington's knee.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]Though G.M. Ernie Accorsi tries to downplay the physical, its import is as obvious as Ernie's jet black hair hat.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]"[URL="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2415715"][COLOR=#606420]He has had a physical with us[/COLOR][/URL]," Accorsi said. "That's all that's taken place. If this triggers another round of hysteria, it will be inaccurate just like the last round. Nothing has happened in the negotiations. Obviously, you're not even going to think about a player without a physical examination. Now we have that."[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]There have been previous reports of disagreement among the coaching staff and the front office regarding whether to sign Arrington. He has a reputation for freelancing, and the Soup Nazi prefers a higher level of discipline.[/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia]Other teams interested in the former Redskin, who gave up $4.4 million in earned bonus money to hit the market in March instead of July, are the Packers, Bengals, Jaguars, and Dolphins.[/FONT][/LEFT]

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

Very interesting... if his knee is indeed that messed up and may require microfracture surgery, getting rid of him looks even more brilliant on the team's part.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

[quote=Mattyk72]Very interesting... if his knee is indeed that messed up and may require microfracture surgery, getting rid of him looks even more brilliant on the team's part.[/quote]

And buying his way out of Ashburn (when Gibbs was willing to do a restructure that would have kept him here) looks like an exceptionally dumb move.

Re: Lavar to the Giants?
 

a thrashed arrington wasn't worth his contract, but even at 50% lavar is VASTLY better than holdman was last year.