Re: Until we have both an Offensive line and Defensive line we will suck....
 

[quote=GMScud;509858]Is it possible for him to be better this year despite having less of a tangible impact (stats-wise)? How come the sacks are way down?[/quote]See above.

If the tangible impact is limited to sacks, then his production is down, but when you consider the way he forces weaker QBs to alter their deliveries with pressure, then I would argue his tangible production is up.

Re: Until we have both an Offensive line and Defensive line we will suck....
 

[quote=Defensewins;509861]They ran that off balanced line effectively against us because they were attacking small DE Andre Carter. Teams are picking on him non-stop. He is the weak link.[/quote]Carter was not in the game for most of the day. And even when he was in for Taylor at the end, the success they had at the end of the game occurred, [B]in my opinion[/B], because of shoddy tackling by Mike Green and Rocky McIntosh more than anything.

I promise to watch to see if Carter is getting blown off the ball in the final drive of the game.

Re: Until we have both an Offensive line and Defensive line we will suck....
 

Agreed, we are right on target for 8-8.

Re: Until we have both an Offensive line and Defensive line we will suck....
 

Charles Casserly says that Stacey Andrews is the best young tackle, available. Also says will be very hard to sign because every team out there knows it and his brother plays for the eagles. Casserly say he will probably end up there. He is a mountain of a man, at 6-7 342. I am editing this, because the everything I read about Andrews is bad. Casserly never has been all that great at evaulting talent any way. Just look at the Skins and the Texans. He is also unlucky. The best move he ever made, taking Williams over Bush, probably forced him to resign