![]() |
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
[quote=Lotus;672679]Mayock is the man when it comes to the draft.[/quote]
He is definitely different from McShay and Kiper. I like Kiper the best though. I do remember though that every year Mayock has a few prospects which are definite "Huh?'s" and head scratchers. |
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
Would you trade the 2nd for Gaither and draft Clausen with the first pick?
|
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
[quote=SmootSmack;673163]Would you trade the 2nd for Gaither and draft Clausen with the first pick?[/quote]I might trade the 2nd for Gaither and still take an OT.
I'd trade the 2nd for Gaither more because it's great value as opposed to it filling a need (which, obviously, it also does). Having Gaither would make Bradford more appealing if he makes it to No. 4 though. It would almost make drafting him a good idea. Almost. |
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
Would you swap firsts with the Ravens and take Gaither? (not that the Ravens are interested in that necessarily)
|
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
but the raven.sare interested in gaither for our second? id do either trade if they threw in a pick in rounds 3 through 5.
|
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
[quote=SmootSmack;673163]Would you trade the 2nd for Gaither and draft Clausen with the first pick?[/quote]
If someone kidnaps Ozzy Newsome and offers us that deal then I would take it in a heartbeat. Edit: Wait WTF? [quote]Trade rumors began swirling on March 7, 2010. The Ravens reportedly might look to trade Gaither in exchange for a first or second round draft choice and then move 2009 first round draft choice Michael Oher to the blindside[B]. The Redskins reportedly offered their second round draft choice in exchange for the 23 year old tackle. [/B][5][/quote] Also if this ends up happening then I wonder if this represents a shift in philosophy for Shanahan. Artis Hicks and Jared Gaither aren't exactly "Shanahan types" at least when it comes to their build. |
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
the only place i've seen that trade rumor is wikipedia. and while wikipedia is a great place to read unbiased information on political candidates or learn how to self diagnose and teat a serious illness, i don't know if we can trust what it says about football rumors, especially when they involve the redskins.
|
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
I'm just tossing out scenarios, I haven't heard any specific mention of Gaither coming here
|
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;673849]the only place i've seen that trade rumor is wikipedia. [B]and while wikipedia is a great place to read unbiased information on political candidates or learn how to self diagnose and teat a serious illness[/B], i don't know if we can trust what it says about football rumors, especially when they involve the redskins.[/quote]
[IMG]http://tsmith91.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/laughing-smiley.png[/IMG] |
Re: Mel/Todd Mock Draft 3.0
[quote=GTripp0012;673813]I might trade the 2nd for Gaither and still take an OT.
I'd trade the 2nd for Gaither more because it's great value as opposed to it filling a need (which, obviously, it also does). Having Gaither would make Bradford more appealing if he makes it to No. 4 though. It would almost make drafting him a good idea. Almost.[/quote] I agree. I would make the trade and be more comfortable taking Bradford in the first.....or go o-line again if he's gone. Just knowing we have a young quality starting LT would open up our options. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.