Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Hopefully the actually hire a proven college football coach. Or at least a proven coordinator like Kirby Smart.

In other news De'Anthony Thomas was hurt and on crutches which would be a huge loss for Oregon if its anything long term.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1029146][url=http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2013/09/29/usc-fires-lane-kiffin/]USC fires Lane Kiffin | Fox News[/url][/quote]

Lane Kiffin down, Mack Brown to go.


You know what would be funny is if both Mack Brown and Kiffin get hired by the others respective school. (Kiffin to Texas, Mack Brown to USC).

Didn't hear about De'Anthony Thomas, but would definitely be a fairly significant loss for Oregon.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Canes still rolling. 49-21 over South Florida.

Ranked 14th now at 4-0.

Next up, a test with 3-1 Georgia Tech.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

sooners looking much better now! Maybe they can make a run at the BCS?

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1029902]sooners looking much better now! Maybe they can make a run at the BCS?[/quote]

. . No

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Aaron Murray welcome to the first round of the draft.

[QUOTE=CultBrennan59;1029955]. . No[/QUOTE]

Probably not. I think it's bama and ore

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1029958]Aaron Murray welcome to the first round of the draft.[/quote]

Doubt it. NFL teams will go for guys like Boyd or Bridgewater than a proven winner with size and strength questions.

I do think he's a first round talent, but sadly I think Bridgewater, Manziel, Fales, and Renner are better NFL prospects than Murray.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1029960]Probably not. I think it's bama and ore[/quote]

Yep those would be my choices. Well, to be exact I would pick the SEC winner vs the PAC 12 winner. Stanford and Oregon play soon, so that'll answer a lot of questions.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Oh man, was that Maryland score for real?

And that UVA loss was just disgusting. There is no more excuses for Mike London.

And the Hokies defense can still shut anyone down. Again locking teams down from Alabama to UNC, if only we had a offense...

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Anybody catch the Baylor game? Holy cow they are a monster. 56 points at half time. 369 yards in the 1st quarter. Over 800 yards for the game.

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

[quote=FRPLG;1030959]Anybody catch the Baylor game? Holy cow they are a monster. 56 points at half time. 369 yards in the 1st quarter. Over 800 yards for the game.[/quote]

They've done that a few times. I have watched them here and there and they're obviously tough to stop. They weren't a fluke while Griffin was there. They've built a solid program. I tuned in a few weeks ago when they were playing LA-Monroe and it was 70-7 EARLY in the 3rd qtr, then they powered down the jets and did'n't score again.


Canes stomped Georgia Tech. 5-0!

The Yellow Jackets actually came within 1 point in the early 4th quarter but Miami's D just took over the game....sacks, INTs...domination. Miami outscored them 21-6 in the last 8 minutes or so of the game. 45-30 final.



GREAT to see Penn State get embarrassed by Indiana. :)

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

^money sure changes things

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

Welcome to Canadian college football:

[yt]0Q5WiBcQsok[/yt]

Re: Official 2013 NCAA College Football Thread
 

I think Baylor is the best football team in the big 12.

Ditto for Clemson in the ACC.

VT has one of--if not the best--defenses in the country. Too bad they don't have a good offense. Could you imagine a team with A&M's offense and VT's Defense?