Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

Fuck

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[QUOTE=metalskins;1180515]LOL! Even at 10-6, they won't make it in as a wild card. Perfect ending to a frustrating season will be seeing the Cowboys taking the last WC spot and actually advancing.[/QUOTE]Dallas isn't making it either have they lose tonight. Nfc is too good.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;1180472]Coaches can’t help having a liability like D. Hall on the field cause Nicholson got hurt.[/quote]

I can not believe how bad he was. He can't play anymore. That's two weeks in a row where he's basically played like an old man.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1180516]So the coach who is directly responsible for the unit that has consistently collapsed at the end of half/game should be the one to take over. That makes sense.

The team should have gotten the half yard. At the NO 35 the team should have been running not throwing. But I'm still not a fan of blowing up the team at this point .[/QUOTE]



I said as interim. Of course he is not the long term answer.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1180489]Tweet from Mike Wise: Big picture, my friend @granthpaulsen is right: today isn't Cousins or Gruden's fault; the last four years haven't been their fault. It's the owner and the team president. The toxicity and mismanagement forbids continuity, stability, consistent winning and even a playoff victory


Yep it all started with Scot situation this OS and it's been a joke since. Dan Snyder fuck u

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]

I'm kind of tired of the Snyder bashing. Yes he and Allen aren't the best people to work for but what did that have to do w/ the loss today? That prevent defense that sucked shit had nothing to do with the owner and his bitch boy.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

Fun fact from Reddit: With today's loss, this marks the 26th consecutive year the Redskins won't win at least 11 games. Every other team in the NFL has done it at least once.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=SolidSnake84;1180488]Jay called in a play for the bubble screen. Kirk checked to crowder for a bubble screen, and Crowder didn't get the check. He didn't know the play call. Kirk threw to where Crowder should have been.[/quote]

Wrong.

From KC post game interview:

"We had a run play called, and based on the defensive look they were giving, it was gonna be a tough run to get, and we were probably gonna get stuffed and have to clock it and hope for the best for the field goal,"



"I looked over to the sideline out of the corner of my eye and saw the coaches saying, 'Throw it,' and they wanted, potentially, an audible, get to an actual pass play," he continued. "I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Lets be clear on this, KC did not call an audible.
He did not run the play that was called which was a run.
He did not audible to a pass which he said he thought that's what the coaches wanted.
He chose option C and threw the ball on a play when his 10 teammates are expecting a run.
This is a mental fuckup on the level of Chris Webber and Leon Lett.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1180533]Fun fact from Reddit: With today's loss, this marks the 26th consecutive year the Redskins won't win at least 11 games. Every other team in the NFL has done it at least once.[/QUOTE]Sad. I was a damn small child fml

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[QUOTE=punch it in;1180530]I said as interim. Of course he is not the long term answer.[/QUOTE]If he can't handle the 2minute defense he shouldn't be given even an interim job.

What I really want to see is if Gruden can put away any of these teams coming up. We should beat all of them by comfortable margins.

Losing, even in the most gut wrenching fashion to the one of the top 3 teams in the league just isn't worth throwing out the head coach.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1180535]Sad. I was a damn small child fml

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]

3 years old too bruh. Right there with you.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=jamf;1180534]Wrong.

From KC post game interview:

"We had a run play called, and based on the defensive look they were giving, it was gonna be a tough run to get, and we were probably gonna get stuffed and have to clock it and hope for the best for the field goal,"



"I looked over to the sideline out of the corner of my eye and saw the coaches saying, 'Throw it,' and they wanted, potentially, an audible, get to an actual pass play," he continued. "I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Lets be clear on this, KC did not call an audible.
He did not run the play that was called which was a run.
He did not audible to a pass which he said he thought that's what the coaches wanted.
He chose option C and threw the ball on a play when his 10 teammates are expecting a run.
This is a mental fuckup on the level of Chris Webber and Leon Lett.[/quote]

Fuckin terrible by Cousins. Cost us a chance at a win. Unacceptable from a vet qb

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=jamf;1180534]Wrong.

From KC post game interview:

"We had a run play called, and based on the defensive look they were giving, it was gonna be a tough run to get, and we were probably gonna get stuffed and have to clock it and hope for the best for the field goal,"



"I looked over to the sideline out of the corner of my eye and saw the coaches saying, 'Throw it,' and they wanted, potentially, an audible, get to an actual pass play," he continued. "I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Lets be clear on this, KC did not call an audible.
He did not run the play that was called which was a run.
He did not audible to a pass which he said he thought that's what the coaches wanted.
He chose option C and threw the ball on a play when his 10 teammates are expecting a run.
This is a mental fuckup on the level of Chris Webber and Leon Lett.[/quote]

I put equal blame on Kirk and the staff for the miscommunication. You should know on the road with a loud crowd that speaking clearly is gonna be hard. Have a backup plan or signal so you don't need words.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=jamf;1180534]Wrong.

From KC post game interview:

"We had a run play called, and based on the defensive look they were giving, it was gonna be a tough run to get, and we were probably gonna get stuffed and have to clock it and hope for the best for the field goal,"



"I looked over to the sideline out of the corner of my eye and saw the coaches saying, 'Throw it,' and they wanted, potentially, an audible, get to an actual pass play," he continued. "I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Lets be clear on this, KC did not call an audible.
He did not run the play that was called which was a run.
He did not audible to a pass which he said he thought that's what the coaches wanted.
He chose option C and threw the ball on a play when his 10 teammates are expecting a run.
This is a mental fuckup on the level of Chris Webber and Leon Lett.[/quote]

Are you really going to come on here and blame this game on Cousins? I just can't get over that. He may or may not have screwed up that play but so fucking what? He dropped numerous dimes all day, the o gave that high school defense a 15 point lead w/ like 5:00 to play. I don't give a damn what happened on that play, it should have never even come down to that if we have someone that could make a stop.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

"I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Well what the fuck didn't you throw it near him for? You threw it towards no one. Ugh.

Re: Heartbreak City: Redskins-Saints Postgame Thread
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1180542]"I thought they were saying if you just throw it by Jamison [Crowder], in the general area of Jamison, there's an eligible [receiver] in the area and there's no penalty."

Well what the fuck didn't you throw it near him for? You threw it towards no one. Ugh.[/quote]

Because he executed it like a timing play. He didn't look over there, just threw the ball expecting a receiver to be near. Those plays exist.

Bad call by Kirk and the coaching staff imo, but the game never should've come to that. That's on the d.