![]() |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Ruhskins;728235]Unconfirmed reports that TJ Housh has signed with Minny...
ryanohalloran For the legions of #Redskins fans who have asked RT @fox6sports Vikings have signed Houshmanzadah - can not personally confirm or deny.[/quote] If that is true than oh well. I could see them going after Clayton for a vet min kinda deal just because of Allen's familiarity with him. I wouldn't have minded having Housh here on a one or two year rental kinda deal. No long term contracts, especially for a guy who's already 32 and entering the probable decline in his career. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
I really hope Bruce Allen knows what he's doing if this is true...
Russellmania09 Reports are that the Vikings have signed TJ, as we just said on @ESPNRadio980 that [B]Clayton and Bryant would likely be choices over Housh[/B] I guess I would take Clayton over Bryant and his bad knee. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Ruhskins;728240]I really hope Bruce Allen knows what he's doing if this is true...
Russellmania09 Reports are that the Vikings have signed TJ, as we just said on @ESPNRadio980 that [B]Clayton and Bryant would likely be choices over Housh[/B] I guess I would take Clayton over Bryant and his bad knee.[/quote] Yeah I wouldn't sign Bryant especially with his whole injury situation right now. If he was 100% healthy and ready to go I'd consider it but he's obviously not. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=skinsfaninok;728237]Rumor is Barber may be headed to New England, again just a Rumor.[/quote]
That'd mean that Maroney's career in NE would be over. The Pats have a ton of picks and need a semblance of a running game, this would make sense for them. If the Pats defense were any better, they'd be a lock for the SB this season. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
CindyBoren
From a Vikings reporter RT @JuddZulgad: NFL source said nothing has happened bet Vikings & Houshmandzadeh at this point. No deal is done. 3 minutes ago via ÜberTwitter |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Ruhskins;728243]That'd mean that Maroney's career in NE would be over.
The Pats have a ton of picks and need a semblance of a running game, this would make sense for them. If the Pats defense were any better, they'd be a lock for the SB this season.[/quote] Didn't Maroney and Barber play together at Minnesota? |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=skinsfaninok;728245]Didn't Maroney and Barber play together at Minnesota?[/quote]
They sure did... [quote]At the University of Minnesota, he (Maroney) split duties with Marion Barber III in 2003 and 2004 and then with Gary Russell in 2005.[/quote] |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
I Kinda hope Dallas trades him.. He's a great short yardage guy and closer
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
sucs if he already went to Minny.
Bryant should be on no ones radar. Clayton... come on bruce he didnt work out for you TB y would he here exactly? |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Chargers cut former Bears CB Nathan Vasher.
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Here's the Scouts Inc. report on Michael Clayton...
2010 Scouting Report - Scouts Inc. Grade: 59 | Key Comment: Clayton has struggled to live up to expectations. He is a big receiver with adequate downfield speed but average acceleration off the line. He builds to speed more than being immediate and struggles to sink his hips to get in and out of breaks with a burst in order to separate from defenders. He runs clean routes but they could be sharper and more explosive. He has a wide receiving radius that allows him to reach down and pluck the low one off the turf. He lacks premier elusiveness once he catches the ball and pretty much has to have a step on defenders to gain many yards after the reception. He is a better fit as a No. 3, or maybe a No. 2 receiver, than a No. 1. He has managed to stay healthy and play a full 16-game season only once in his previous six seasons. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Ruhskins;728252]Chargers cut former Bears CB Nathan Vasher.[/quote]
What's the deal with him? He made the Pro-Bowl as a cornerback with the Bears, how did he drop off so fast? |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Not a cut, but still a loss for Seattle:
JasonLaCanfora Alex Gibbs has left the Seattle coaching staff. He's a longtime OL coach. Tough time to lose any coach. 2 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry® |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;728248]sucs if he already went to Minny.
Bryant should be on no ones radar. Clayton... come on bruce he didnt work out for you TB y would he here exactly?[/quote] Adam Schefter RT @Jordan101GFX Has Housh signed with Minny or not? Hearing two reports. ... [B]As of yet, he has not even spoken with the Vikings.[/B] |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=mooby;728258]What's the deal with him? He made the Pro-Bowl as a cornerback with the Bears, how did he drop off so fast?[/quote]
Injuries. I don't know if you recall but he a couple of years, back to back, where he missed a ton of games. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=12thMan;728264]Injuries. I don't know if you recall but he a couple of years, back to back, where he missed a ton of games.[/quote]
Actually I kinda don't. Were they potentially career threatening? What a fall he's had, he's not even been in the league more than 6 years I think. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Talks are heating up between STl and SD.. I guess we aren't going after Jackson. O well, Rams could actually compete in that piss poor division with VJ
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=CRedskinsRule;728260]Not a cut, but still a loss for Seattle:
JasonLaCanfora Alex Gibbs has left the Seattle coaching staff. He's a longtime OL coach. Tough time to lose any coach. 2 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®[/quote] Yeah, what's up with that. Looks like Pete doesn't have it all together up there. Bad way to start the season for Seattle.. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=mooby;728265]Actually I kinda don't. Were they potentially career threatening? What a fall he's had, he's not even been in the league more than 6 years I think.[/quote]
Yeah, both were really bad. One year it was a groin injury and then 2007 it was just a combo of lingering shit from '06. You probably remember 2005 when he was a stud returning kicks and ints. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=mooby;728258]What's the deal with him? He made the Pro-Bowl as a cornerback with the Bears, how did he drop off so fast?[/quote]
Also, cover 2 corners are the equivalent of running backs in Shanahan's system. Most of the time you can find replacements, while your former players go on to struggle in non-cover 2 systems. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Eagles trade Stacy Andrews to Seattle. I wonder if this has anything to do with Okung's injury. And are the Eagles that deep at OL?
Adam_Schefter Seahawks traded a late-round 2011 draft pick to Philadelphia for OL Stacy Andrews. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Ruhskins;728273]Eagles trade Stacy Andrews to Seattle. I wonder if this has anything to do with Okung's injury. And are the Eagles that deep at OL?
Adam_Schefter Seahawks traded a late-round 2011 draft pick to Philadelphia for OL Stacy Andrews.[/quote] Perhaps they'll get Stacy Andrews to coach the O-Line in Seattle then. He's got 7 years of experience. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Paintrain;728221]Is Michael Clayton worth 7 exclamation points?[/quote]
Damn, didn't even realize I used exclamation points. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Interesting. Both Andrews brothers gone. Two or three years ago, it looked like both could be perenial pro-bowlers.
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
From Nfl.com
Andrews, whom the Eagles gave a $4.1 million signing bonus in the spring, became expendable after the team traded for Arizona Cardinals guard Reggie Wells on Friday. Wells, a sixth-round draft pick in 2003, started 90 games in seven years with the Cardinals, including 64 in a row since late in the 2005 season. I missed where they had picked up a guard. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81a47022/article/bengals-acquire-safety-nelson-from-jaguars-for-cb-jones?module=HP_headlines]NFL.com news: Bengals acquire safety Nelson from Jaguars for CB Jones[/url]
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=12thMan;728268]Yeah, both were really bad. One year it was a groin injury and then 2007 it was just a combo of lingering shit from '06. You probably remember 2005 when he was a stud returning kicks and ints.[/quote]
Ah yeah, that year he went to the Pro Bowl he had multiple int. returns and he also returned that missed field goal like 108 yards. @Dirtbag: Goodcall on Cover 2 corners, I don't think I even realized the Bears were running a Cover 2 back then. I used to think they were set for multiple years with Charles Tillman and Nathan Vasher back there. Apparantly not haha. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Paintrain;727848]Cincy has nowhere for him.. Ocho, T.O. and Shipley are locked into the top 3 spots, he's not going to be a #4 WR.
It will probably be between us and Minnesota.. He's better than any WR on our team other than Moss so I'd be 100% behind him coming to DC.[/quote] He's better than Moss. Moss hasn't been good since the Brunell days, and he drops routine passes on the regular. He'd be the #3 WR on a lot of teams. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Paintrain;727861]Oh, bring in young studs, why didn't I think of that? Of course there's a hope that works out (ex. Kelly, Thomas) but when it doesn't then you need to supplement to help you win games. Bringing in Housh on a 2 year deal wouldn't have any negative impact on the teams fortunes.[/quote]
I agree. And 32 is hardly old as far as Wide Receivers go... Santana's 31. Housh has 4-5 good years left. He caught 79 balls last year. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
I hope we get Housh but I don't see it. If we get any WR it's between Clayton and Bryant and I'm betting Clayton would sign given that Allen drafted him.
But don't expect much from him... "Coaches say Clayton is the most impressive player in practice each week, but on Sundays, he pulls a Houdini. Bucs GM Mark Dominik must watch a lot of practice, as he gave Clatyon a new contract with $10 million in guarantees just last year." [url=http://nfl-facts-and-rumors.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/22475988/24325138]NFL cut day: updating the latest noteworthy moves - CBSSports.com[/url] |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
Justin Hartwig. Guy should be looked at.
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
I got 2 more for you. Max Jean Gilles (or something like that) and Derrick Burgess.
You want to boost the lines and the LBs take at look at these 2 vets. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
What about Javon Walker? Dude has awesome hands and is a year younger than Housh...
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
when does the waiver wire clear?
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
IMO I would say Clayton is almost certain to be a redskin. We need that big target in the redzone and he's cheap
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
with 10 career tds in 6 years he does not sound like much of a threat, redzone or any where else.
|
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=skinsfaninok;728384]IMO I would say Clayton is almost certain to be a redskin. We need that big target in the redzone and he's cheap[/quote]
I don't know what you are talking about...where are you getting this opinion? We're well past the years of picking up folks merely because they are "cheap AND available" Not saying its not possible...I just haven't heard any interest in him...unless you have a link |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=skinsfaninok;728384]IMO I would say Clayton is almost certain to be a redskin. We need that big target in the redzone and he's cheap[/quote]
WTF would we bring in this good for nothing loser who would honestly be 5th on the depth chart at best. |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
he would prolly be our #2 actually........which is kind of sad.
But Id have him in their over both Galloway and DT, the way this PS has looked....... |
Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
[quote=Mechanix544;728391]he would prolly be our #2 actually........which is kind of sad.
But Id have him in their over both Galloway and DT, the way this PS has looked.......[/quote] What has Michael Clayton done to warrant being our #2 if he came here? Did he blow Shanny? Cause that's the only way he's our #2 WR. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.