Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;1102932]A good coach is a good coach. Getting in players faces may work at first, but, without good coaching, it wears thin fast. What matters is getting results. W. Phillips gets results.

Like others have said, [B]he is not a long term plan[/B] but he is a HUGE upgrade over Hazlett.
I got no problem with WP. I would count us lucky to get him.[/quote]

Given that a year from now likely we will be doing the total housecleaning that we should be doing now, no one in the FO is a long-term employee.

Wade Philips is a good choice for a one-year rental.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

Kinda amazing folks ready to give up on Jay g already.

I think wade Phillips would be a solid addition. Think he could do a good job with the defense, also could help Jay as a head coach. Wade could offer great support to the staff as a whole.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1102952]Kinda amazing folks ready to give up on Jay g already.

I think wade Phillips would be a solid addition. Think he could do a good job with the defense, also could help Jay as a head coach. Wade could offer great support to the staff as a whole.[/QUOTE]
I agree.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

Why hasn't Phillips coached since the texans? Retirement?

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=Chico23231;1102952]Kinda amazing folks ready to give up on Jay g already.

I think wade Phillips would be a solid addition. Think he could do a good job with the defense, also could help Jay as a head coach. Wade could offer great support to the staff as a whole.[/quote]

I agree with you about Wade.

And I'm not giving up on Gruden (although I have my doubts) as much as I'm done with anything that involves Bruce Allen, as such things always end in disaster.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=HailGreen28;1102954]Why hasn't Phillips coached since the texans? Retirement?[/quote]

I mean it's only been one season that he hasn't coached

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

I like Wade but dont want him,I would like us to go back to the 4-3 def.Never been happy with the 3-4.Until we can get a stud nosetackle screw the 3-4

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

Wade would be nice but I agree Ht I'm down with the 4-3 defense now. Screw the 34

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

If Phillips comes here the 3-4 isn't going away.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk;1102967]If Phillips comes here the 3-4 isn't going away.[/QUOTE]
True and more to the point we know he knows what a 3-4 needs, and I imagine he would get what he needs

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=HailGreen28;1102954]Why hasn't Phillips coached since the texans? Retirement?[/quote]

He took some time off to model for the Pillsbury Dough Boy. Can't blame him, really.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1102961]I mean it's only been one season that he hasn't coached[/quote]
365....very long days
Sorry! dude has lost it.....

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=htownskinfan;1102962]I like Wade but dont want him,I would like us to go back to the 4-3 def.Never been happy with the 3-4.Until we can get a stud nosetackle screw the 3-4[/quote]

no offense, but i guess you don't know WP's defensive plan too well. he uses smaller DTs at nose to shoot the gap, and he uses a 4 man front on 3rd down (moving the OLBs to a DE look). cofield would be a better fit in that system.


also, (not at you htown) - let's be careful about bleacher report articles. they're usually very poorly written/researched and meant to get page views rather than inform. i'm not saying it's all crap, but...

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[QUOTE=That Guy;1103051]no offense, but i guess you don't know WP's defensive plan too well. he uses smaller DTs at nose to shoot the gap, and he uses a 4 man front on 3rd down (moving the OLBs to a DE look). cofield would be a better fit in that system.





also, (not at you htown) - let's be careful about bleacher report articles. they're usually very poorly written/researched and meant to get page views rather than inform. i'm not saying it's all crap, but...[/QUOTE]


Well no I did not know that, thanks for informing me.if that's the case and we're going to stick with the 3-4 then it seems like Wade would be a good fit.

Re: Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.
 

[quote=htownskinfan;1103056]Well no I did not know that, thanks for informing me.if that's the case and we're going to stick with the 3-4 then it seems like Wade would be a good fit.[/quote]

Yea Wade teaches a 1 Gap technique. We were running a two gap technique woih Haslett but it felt like to me our Dline is built for a 1 Gap.

If we go get Wade. I could see us using our first pick on a Dlineman