Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[QUOTE=Chico23231;1261687]Why is Alex Smith the number 2?



There is no way in hell I want him on the field[/QUOTE]



Why? His leg is no more liable to break again than anyone elses. It would absolutely horrendous if he suffered another bad injury but he just busted his ass for months and months and months. If he wants to get back out there than im all about it. All that work - gotta be a payoff.

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

I see Kyle Allen going 4-2 against our next 6 opponentswith at least 3 division wins.

I wonder how good the Rams really are. Three of their wins are against our division

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1261628]I can't believe Alex Smith could see action Sunday (If Allen goes down) who would have ever thought it??[/QUOTE]



I did pose the question about what was going on with him a couple days ago so ill say it crossed my mind... [emoji848]

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[url=https://ibb.co/syM4CSV][img]https://i.ibb.co/pJ9TQDL/IMG-0888.jpg[/img][/url]

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[QUOTE=jamf;1261709][url=https://ibb.co/syM4CSV][img]https://i.ibb.co/pJ9TQDL/IMG-0888.jpg[/img][/url][/QUOTE]



HAHAHAHAHA. That’s awesome.

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[quote=punch it in;1261705]Why? His leg is no more liable to break again than anyone elses. It would absolutely horrendous if he suffered another bad injury but he just busted his ass for months and months and months. If he wants to get back out there than im all about it. All that work - gotta be a payoff.[/quote]Agreed. It's his body and his career. He has decided to play. The Washington Football Team should honor that decision if necessary.

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

The more I see and hear what Rivera and Turner are saying, the more I believe this is not about the evaluation of Haskins and the team anymore. I think that process is over. They are looking at this division, and think they might be able to win it...but not with Haskins at the helm. They know the rest of the team probably feels that way as well. If they don't make this move, they will most definitely lose the other 52.

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1261706]I see Kyle Allen going 4-2 against our next 6 opponentswith at least 3 division wins.

I wonder how good the Rams really are. Three of their wins are against our division

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk[/quote]

If they beat LA Sunday, I could see them starting a small streak for sure

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

Also, it sounds like this was his plan all along if Haskins didn't show progress. He said he formulated this plan during the off season. I mean if they were three games out of first place and the team was not competitive in any of their contests, he probably rolls with Haskins. But they have been competitive, and they do have a chance to make some noise if they can get better QB play. So I have zero problems with him making this decision at this point, considering what the division looks like. He owes it to the team to see what they can do.

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[quote=jamf;1261709][url=https://ibb.co/syM4CSV][img]https://i.ibb.co/pJ9TQDL/IMG-0888.jpg[/img][/url][/quote]

Nailed it

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1261713]If they beat LA Sunday, I could see them starting a small streak for sure[/QUOTE]


If they even keep the game competitive and lose, I’ll feel perfectly fine with Haskins riding the bench for the rest of the season


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1261713]If they beat LA Sunday, I could see them starting a small streak for sure[/QUOTE]Even if they lose to the rams, the next 5 games after that are certainly winnable.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1261714]Also, it sounds like this was his plan all along if Haskins didn't show progress. He said he formulated this plan during the off season. I mean if they were three games out of first place and the team was not competitive in any of their contests, he probably rolls with Haskins. But they have been competitive, and they do have a chance to make some noise if they can get better QB play. So I have zero problems with him making this decision at this point, considering what the division looks like. He owes it to the team to see what they can do.[/quote]

He also said the sideline Sunday had a certain body language , meaning they knew Haskins wouldn't get it done, and today Haskins at practice was folded arms just pouting, maybe he's not a leader right now?

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

Same ole shit...

Re: Kyle Allen named the starter
 

[quote=Chico23231;1261719]Same ole shit...[/quote]

I actually feel it's different, I think Ron really is calling the shots. This is a power move by him and he's really convinced KA is ready