![]() |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;1139505]Hope Trump doesn't have any fences around his mansions. Don't want him to look like a hypocrite or anything.[/quote]
They are sure around his golf course's actually more like a moat . [url=http://www.trump.com/]Trump Luxury Real Estate | Trump Real Estate Portfolio | Trump Towers[/url] |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/22/cruz-staffer-sorry-for-posting-inaccurate-story-that-claimed-rubio-dismissed-the-bible/[/url]
There is dirty politics and then there is this...unbelieveble. How could anyone vote for Cruz. Folks, it's time to get on the Rubio bus. I think a Rubio/ Nikki Haley ticket would b a Hillary killa |
Republican nominee for President
[url=http://civicskunkworks.com/there-is-no-evidence-that-marco-rubio-would-be-a-better-president-than-donald-trump/]There Is No Evidence That Marco Rubio Would Be a Better President Than Donald Trump | Skunk Works[/url]
[url=http://civicskunkworks.com/marco-rubio-says-you-cant-live-on-10hr-so-what-people-just-die/]Marco Rubio Says You Can’t Live on $10/Hr, So…What? People Just Die? | Skunk Works[/url] |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139412]You would be 110% correct in everything you are saying if all we were talking about were people like yourself but we aren't ,the Pope doesn't like Donald Trump ..........that says it all![/quote]
Never read anything about the Pope saying he doesn't like Trump. In fact, from what I read, the Pope's words were a generalization. He didn't come out and say, "Donald Trump is not a Christian". He said it is not [I]Christian[/I] to want to put up walls. I agree. It isn't. Of course, the Pope is behind a wall....hhhmmm..... but I digress... I think you're blowing all of this out of proportion, because you, yourself don't like Donald Trump. I like Trump. Do I like him as a President? Nah, I think of him as a cartoon character, just like ol' Bernie Kosar Sanders. There's nobody from either side who will get the nomination that can truthfully be a successful President IMO. Which is sad. But the long and short of it is, if I don't vote for a presidential candidate, whatever the Pope says is not going to be my deciding factor. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
Really don't understand why the GOP voters love candidates with no experience so much. Only one of the last five has any executive experience, none of them have any foreign policy experience, which is like 1/2 the job. Two of them have never been elected to anything.
[B]Can anyone honestly say that if you were hiring for the position of President, that you would even consider these people for the job? [/B] It is like going to the hospital for major surgery and asking for the least experienced doctor they had, infact not even a doctor let the orderly do it. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=metalskins;1139572]Never read anything about the Pope saying he doesn't like Trump. In fact, from what I read, the Pope's words were a generalization. He didn't come out and say, "Donald Trump is not a Christian". He said it is not [I]Christian[/I] to want to put up walls. I agree. It isn't. Of course, the Pope is behind a wall....hhhmmm.....
but I digress... I think you're blowing all of this out of proportion, because you, yourself don't like Donald Trump. I like Trump. Do I like him as a President? Nah, I think of him as a cartoon character, just like ol' Bernie Kosar Sanders. There's nobody from either side who will get the nomination that can truthfully be a successful President IMO. Which is sad. But the long and short of it is, if I don't vote for a presidential candidate, whatever the Pope says is not going to be my deciding factor.[/quote] Very well put....... |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Hijinx;1139579]Really don't understand why the GOP voters love candidates with no experience so much. Only one of the last five has any executive experience, none of them have any foreign policy experience, which is like 1/2 the job. Two of them have never been elected to anything.
[B]Can anyone honestly say that if you were hiring for the position of President, that you would even consider these people for the job? [/B] It is like going to the hospital for major surgery and asking for the least experienced doctor they had, infact not even a doctor let the orderly do it.[/quote] that's why europeans kind of think our version of democracy is a bit crazy. parliaments (like in britain) have elections and the majority party gets the prime minister, who's usually been around and in that party for a long time, and is answerable to them. the problem with outsiders is that people elect them thinking they'll be able to change things, and don't realize that the president's powers are actually a bit limited, especially if he's fighting congress. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=metalskins;1139572]Never read anything about the Pope saying he doesn't like Trump. In fact, from what I read, the Pope's words were a generalization. He didn't come out and say, "Donald Trump is not a Christian". He said it is not [I]Christian[/I] to want to put up walls. I agree. It isn't. Of course, the Pope is behind a wall....hhhmmm.....
but I digress... I think you're blowing all of this out of proportion, because you, yourself don't like Donald Trump. I like Trump. Do I like him as a President? Nah, I think of him as a cartoon character, just like ol' Bernie Kosar Sanders. There's nobody from either side who will get the nomination that can truthfully be a successful President IMO. Which is sad. But the long and short of it is, if I don't vote for a presidential candidate, whatever the Pope says is not going to be my deciding factor.[/quote] Spin anyway to keep yourself happy but when World leaders make comments such as the Pope and he is a World leader and others you just know we are in for trouble. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=That Guy;1139585]that's why europeans kind of think our version of democracy is a bit crazy. parliaments (like in britain) have elections and the majority party gets the prime minister, who's usually been around and in that party for a long time, and is answerable to them.
the problem with outsiders is that people elect them thinking they'll be able to change things, and don't realize that the president's powers are actually a bit limited, especially if he's fighting congress.[/quote] No, the problem is special interest and lobbiest who buy and sell influence within the political system. It's no great secret. That's why trump and Bernie are doing so well. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139598]Spin anyway to keep yourself happy but when World leaders make comments such as the Pope and he is a World leader and others you just know we are in for trouble.[/quote]
I'm not spinning though. The Vatican came out and pretty much said just what I had posted. Those were not [I]my[/I] words. As opposed to the words you posted, which [I]are[/I] your words, not the Pope's. And at any rate, it's an argument about Trump's true spirituality, which is kind of funny, since the thought of liberals is that religion should not have anything to do with who occupies the White House. Yet, this whole thing is based on if Trump is a true Christian or not. I just find it all ironic. Any other team, people would be denouncing anything the Pope has to say, because "Religion shouldn't have anything to do with the political process", yet if he happens to be opposed to a Republican candidate, then it's, "We should listen to the Pope!" Can't have it both ways. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
Did anyone see this?! SMH.
[url]https://www.facebook.com/MitchellWiggs/videos/10156535712880257/[/url] There is literally no substance to what these people are saying. People are running with ONE talking point. "I looove guns. I love the second amendment, so I'm voting for Trump." "He has big balls, I'm voting for Trump." Aside from a wall, he hasn't said SHIT. I hate politics and am already over it. Every other candidate has their own brand of bullshit, but it's the typical stuff we're used to every election season. His shit is just slammed in your face non-stop and these people just make me sad for America. If those type of people are what's going to make America "great" again, I hear Canada is beautiful this time of year. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
I'm voting for Trump just so I can watch him troll the other leaders of the world. :laughing2
[quote=MTK;1139537][url=http://civicskunkworks.com/marco-rubio-says-you-cant-live-on-10hr-so-what-people-just-die/]Marco Rubio Says You Can’t Live on $10/Hr, So…What? People Just Die? | Skunk Works[/url][/quote] Not his fucking problem. He got his. Doesn't care. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;1139603]Did anyone see this?! SMH.
[url]https://www.facebook.com/MitchellWiggs/videos/10156535712880257/[/url] There is literally no substance to what these people are saying. People are running with ONE talking point. "I looove guns. I love the second amendment, so I'm voting for Trump." "He has big balls, I'm voting for Trump." Aside from a wall, he hasn't said SHIT. I hate politics and am already over it. Every other candidate has their own brand of bullshit, but it's the typical stuff we're used to every election season. His shit is just slammed in your face non-stop and these people just make me sad for America. If those type of people are what's going to make America "great" again, I hear Canada is beautiful this time of year.[/quote] Have you seen the educational levels of this country? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/o7V81aM.jpg[/IMG] |
Re: Republican nominee for President
LOL. I guess that sums it up nicely. I mean these people were CRYING to see some piece of shit reality star.
|
Re: Republican nominee for President
It's shocking to think the rest of the world thinks of us as...shallow...decadent and valueless.
|
Re: Republican nominee for President
I'm just going to put [URL="http://33hpwq10j9luq8gl43e62q4e.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/images/president-camacho-machine-gun.jpg"]this guy[/URL] in as a write in vote so we can speed this entire thing up.
|
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=MTK;1139537][url=http://civicskunkworks.com/there-is-no-evidence-that-marco-rubio-would-be-a-better-president-than-donald-trump/]There Is No Evidence That Marco Rubio Would Be a Better President Than Donald Trump | Skunk Works[/url]
[url=http://civicskunkworks.com/marco-rubio-says-you-cant-live-on-10hr-so-what-people-just-die/]Marco Rubio Says You Can’t Live on $10/Hr, So…What? People Just Die? | Skunk Works[/url][/quote] The minimum wage, sure I think it needs a small hike and should be a 2 tiered approach in some higher cost of living places....but who should be working on this wage? ....teenagers, maybe early 20s-college kids, part-timers, older folks who may want supplemental income, maybe a spouse who is not the primary wage earner....That's kinda who should be making this. I really think folks should strive for a higher wage. Some rather make this wage and receive assistance from the government. If you don't think this is true, you should have worked with me when I worked for VCU and worked within the poorer communities of the city. Folks, Im awestruck at the lack of talk about education in this campaign. This is how you lift folks up. It affects a ton of other issues, especially income inequality, minimum wage, entitlement programs, government spending, etc. This is really a dumb country. For some reason folks want hand outs...its easier I guess. Free college, free health, free family leave, free everything... |
Republican nominee for President
Even $15/hr is a barely livable wage. $10 is a poverty wage.
Fact is wages have been stagnant for far too long. And with so many manufacturing jobs flying out of the country, lower paying jobs like retail/fast food are no longer just for students or housewives. When someone is working two jobs with no healthcare and they need assistance as well, that's just a disgrace. I see this sort of thing every day in my work. Bernie has been talking about education all along. He's the only candidate that's beating that drum. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Hog1;1139622]It's shocking to think the rest of the world thinks of us as...shallow...decadent and valueless.[/quote]
Electing Donald Trump would just prove their point. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
What has Obama accomplished in the past 8 years in this arena?
|
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139628][B]Electing Donald Trump[/B] would just prove their point.[/quote]
Who.....has suggested that? |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139628]Electing Donald Trump would just prove their point.[/quote]
Who gives a shit? We dont elect someone based on what the rest of the world thinks. And for that matter most of their leaders already suck ass so feck them right back. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Hog1;1139629]What has Obama accomplished in the past 8 years in this arena?[/quote]
Not much, with no help from Congress of course. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Alvin Walton;1139633]Who gives a shit?
We dont elect someone based on what the rest of the world thinks. And for that matter most of their leaders already suck ass so feck them right back.[/quote] I see you don't but many people in this country don't feel like letting "the donald" start a "Thermal Nuclear War"just becuase he wants to bully poorer nations around .He hates women,he hates Mexicans and he hates all Muslims; He's an idiot! [url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/07/17/what-the-world-thinks-about-our-infatuation-with-donald-trump/[/url] |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139635]I see you don't but many people in this country don't feel like letting "the donald" start a "Thermal Nuclear War"just becuase he wants to bully poorer nations around .He hates women,he hates Mexicans and he hates all Muslims;
He's an idiot! [url]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/07/17/what-the-world-thinks-about-our-infatuation-with-donald-trump/[/url][/quote] That's a lot of stupidity for one....short paragraph. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
Wheres my facepalm jpeg?
|
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Hog1;1139636]That's a lot of stupidity for one....short paragraph.[/quote]
Donald Trump makes it easy. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Chico23231;1139599]No, the problem is special interest and lobbiest who buy and sell influence within the political system. It's no great secret.
That's why trump and Bernie are doing so well.[/quote] maybe you misread my post? the problem with outsiders isn't special interests or lobbyist, that's the problem with our political system, which, i assume is the point you wanted to make. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Hog1;1139629]What has Obama accomplished in the past 8 years in this arena?[/quote]
How much is he expected to accomplish when he's had a do nothing Congress who's made it their sole mission to stonewall him on anything. Good legislation, bad legislation, it quite frankly didn't matter what Obama suggested, the GOP was going to do the opposite just to spite him and show their constituents they are "anti-Obama". How else can you explain how they are already gearing up to stop any SCOTUS nomination BEFORE any nominee has ever been announced. All of those pricks should lose their positions come election time. Hopefully the Senate and House can regain some positions back. Look at this shit. A piece of shit Senator filibustering his OWN legislation. [url=http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/mcconnell-filibusters-his-own-bill-to-lift-debt-ceiling]McConnell Filibusters His Own Bill To Lift Debt Ceiling[/url] That said, Obama is still a shitty ass President and deserves his share of the ill will towards the shit that's gone on the past 7 years. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139638]Donald Trump makes it easy.[/quote]
Anyone else make it easy for you to be stupid? Oh, and its spelled [I]thermonuclear.[/I] I'd be curious to know who the participants of this nuclear war are. |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=NC_Skins;1139645]How much is he expected to accomplish when he's had a do nothing Congress who's made it their sole mission to stonewall him on anything. Good legislation, bad legislation, it quite frankly didn't matter what Obama suggested, the GOP was going to do the opposite just to spite him and show their constituents they are "anti-Obama". How else can you explain how they are already gearing up to stop any SCOTUS nomination BEFORE any nominee has ever been announced. All of those pricks should lose their positions come election time. Hopefully the Senate and House can regain some positions back.
Look at this shit. A piece of shit Senator filibustering his OWN legislation. [url=http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/mcconnell-filibusters-his-own-bill-to-lift-debt-ceiling]McConnell Filibusters His Own Bill To Lift Debt Ceiling[/url] That said, Obama is still a shitty ass President and deserves his share of the ill will towards the shit that's gone on the past 7 years.[/quote] The same was true of Democrats with Bush. It's all part and parcel of the same forces that are leading to Sanders and Trump making strong waves. I like the 2 party system far more than the fragmented block system used in a lot of places, but our problem is that the 2 parties we have are too entrenched in power, so the parties that spring up are normally on the outside fringe (tea party, green, etc.) There is a place for a middle ground party that espouses moderate social, moral and fiscal policy and could garner enough votes to wedge itself between liberal democrats and conservative republicans. I would LOVE to see Sanders and Trump nominated, hoping that it would bring a coalition of moderates, left and right, together to form a new faction/party. I also want star trek transporters... |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Alvin Walton;1139648]Anyone else make it easy for you to be stupid?
Oh, and its spelled [I]thermonuclear.[/I] I'd be curious to know who the participants of this nuclear war are.[/quote] Aaaahhhh , now the name calling starts.:goodjob: |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1139656]The same was true of Democrats with Bush.
It's all part and parcel of the same forces that are leading to Sanders and Trump making strong waves. I like the 2 party system far more than the fragmented block system used in a lot of places, but our problem is that the 2 parties we have are too entrenched in power, so the parties that spring up are normally on the outside fringe (tea party, green, etc.) There is a place for a middle ground party that espouses moderate social, moral and fiscal policy and could garner enough votes to wedge itself between liberal democrats and conservative republicans. I would LOVE to see Sanders and Trump nominated, hoping that it would bring a coalition of moderates, left and right, together to form a new faction/party. I also want star trek transporters...[/quote] Me too! Star Trek transporters that is! |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=NC_Skins;1139645]How much is he expected to accomplish when he's had a do nothing Congress who's made it their sole mission to stonewall him on anything. Good legislation, bad legislation, it quite frankly didn't matter what Obama suggested, the GOP was going to do the opposite just to spite him and show their constituents they are "anti-Obama". How else can you explain how they are already gearing up to stop any SCOTUS nomination BEFORE any nominee has ever been announced. All of those pricks should lose their positions come election time. Hopefully the Senate and House can regain some positions back.
Look at this shit. A piece of shit Senator filibustering his OWN legislation. [url=http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/mcconnell-filibusters-his-own-bill-to-lift-debt-ceiling]McConnell Filibusters His Own Bill To Lift Debt Ceiling[/url] That said, [B]Obama is still a shitty ass President and deserves his share of the ill will towards the shit that's gone on the past 7 years[/B].[/quote] then we agree |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Giantone;1139660]Aaaahhhh , now the name calling starts.:goodjob:[/quote]
Self named. Are you going to tell me about this hyperbole war, or are you going to be butt hurt and just sulk? |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=CRedskinsRule;1139656]The same was true of Democrats with Bush.
It's all part and parcel of the same forces that are leading to Sanders and Trump making strong waves. I like the 2 party system far more than the fragmented block system used in a lot of places, but our problem is that the 2 parties we have are too entrenched in power, so the parties that spring up are normally on the outside fringe (tea party, green, etc.) There is a place for a middle ground party that espouses moderate social, moral and fiscal policy and could garner enough votes to wedge itself between liberal democrats and conservative republicans. I would LOVE to see Sanders and Trump nominated, hoping that it would bring a coalition of moderates, left and right, together to form a new faction/party. I also want star trek transporters...[/quote] the problem with first past the pole (winner take all) voting systems (like we have) is that eventually, they always end up with exactly two parties. in order to build up a viable third or fourth party, you'd need to switch to proportional representation (ie, libertarians get 20% of the votes, they get 20% of the seats). |
Re: Republican nominee for President
OK, so people who thought GWB or Obama were bad presidents, define that.
When you woke up one day, was your life different? |
Re: Republican nominee for President
Was your life substantially different the day........before your house was foreclosed on by the bank?
How far does the rope go....ask Greece |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;1139675]OK, so people who thought GWB or Obama were bad presidents, define that.
When you woke up one day, was your life different?[/quote] thankfully we live in Virginia which was largely unaffected by the economic collapse of 2008...due to a number of factors...but a lot of folks across the country have struggled. Like Matty stated above, a lot of folks due to the Bush/Obama economy cant make enough to live on and have to get help. Some fault is on those individuals, some on economic factors. Certainly if you known anybody that has fought war or been deployed have been affected. The failures of both Bush and Obama are evident. Bush economic policies, Obama foreign policies. This country could do a lot better....ALOT better. National deficit, stagnant wage growth along with cost of living are absolutely terrible right now. Obama has sat back and watched it happen. Look across the world and there is so much instability abroad its frighten. Africa, Middle East, South/Central America, South East Asia...I wouldn't travel abroad right now to any of those places. Its absolutely sad...the snowball been rolling and the team of Obama/Kerry/Susan Rice foreign policy has been terrible. Shit Hillary was more effective and she got state department folks killed abroad! |
Re: Republican nominee for President
[quote=Chico23231;1139678]This country could do a lot better....ALOT better. National deficit, stagnant wage growth along with cost of living are absolutely terrible right now. [B]Obama has sat back and watched it happen[/B]. Look across the world and there is so much instability abroad its frighten. [/quote]
Do tell. How is Obama supposed to handle this without the help of Congress? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.