Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=Chico23231;949238]i guess with its good news with unemployment under 8% we cant look at it objective? So part time jobs JUST started getting included in employment numbers? I guess we should root for a continuation of unemployment/people[B] struggling[/B] for Mitt's sake?[/quote]


What side is having the melt down?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PePhqHoqYQ"]EPIC MELTDOWN: Chris Matthews UNLOADS On Obama after First presidential DEBATE - YouTube[/ame]


and this one never gets old

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE[/ame]

this is what happens to liberals

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HgMSKCfwvQ[/ame]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=NC_Skins;949250][url]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/opinion/krugman-romneys-sick-joke.html?smid=FB-nytimes&WT.mc_id=OP-E-FB-SM-LIN-RSJ-100512-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click[/url]


There really should be buzzers or fact checkers in debates to BUZZ when candidates are lying.[/quote]Electric shock collars around the candidates necks, jolts administered to be decided by CBO, factcheck.org, whatever organizations can be determined to be fair if any.

And have a 2 minute "shot clock" visible in front of them (so the debaters can see it, and and behind them so all the observers can see it.) When time's up, the debater's mike is cut off and camera cut away, so the moderator can tell the other debater his time is about to start. No exceptions. If the debater tries to continue talking, he gets shocked.

And have more than the Big Two party candidates in these debates. Libertarian, Green, Communist, Constitution, any other decent size parties, at least pick a couple to make it at least a four way debate. It might make things more honest.

I know this is all fanciful, but can we at least have the electric shock collars?

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;948979]I know you live in the People's Republic of MD and don't get out much....but I would refer you to these polls that show on abortion and gay marriage a majority do not support those positions: :cool-smil[/quote]
SS ,you're way to smart to fall for that poll crap, you and I both know it's bias,where were the calls made to ,....bet a bunch were to the "Bible belt"now call SanFran and see how many are against same sex marriage.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=NC_Skins;918581][IMG]http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/547477_299236103497771_123753431046040_675224_1706278863_n.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

LOL! How that guy is still ahead in the polls is a mystery to me.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=Bishop Hammer;949287]LOL! How that guy is still ahead in the polls is a mystery to me.[/quote]

Because the guy he's running against is even worse. Sad but true.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=NC_Skins;949292]Because the guy he's running against is even worse. Sad but true.[/quote]



BINGO,lock thread now!(joke)

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=NC_Skins;949250][URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/opinion/krugman-romneys-sick-joke.html?smid=FB-nytimes&WT.mc_id=OP-E-FB-SM-LIN-RSJ-100512-NYT-NA&WT.mc_ev=click[/URL]


There really should be buzzers or fact checkers in debates to BUZZ when candidates are lying.[/quote]

Every debate would sound like it's attended by a swam of large bees.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=RedskinRat;949332]Every debate would sound like it's attended by a swam of large bees.[/quote]


...and on that note.



[url=http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/10/06/162404662/romney-health-care-debate-claim-gets-corrected-by-his-own-staff?sc=fb&cc=fp]Romney Health Care Debate Claim Gets Corrected By His Own Staff : Shots - Health Blog : NPR[/url]



It's really bad when your own campaign has to correct your mistakes in the debate and even sadder that some of the American people buy the bullshit that Romney is saying. Not sure what Obama was thinking or doing in this debate allowing him to get away with it.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

I don't care who does it but programs like these need to stay ....not be cut!!!



[url=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/10/nj_military_families_stung_by.html#incart_river_default]N.J. military families stung by loss of program for disabled kids | NJ.com[/url]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/VHvTd.jpg[/IMG]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=NC_Skins;950365][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/VHvTd.jpg[/IMG][/quote]


lol...ya got my vote!

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

let's just vote on every issue instead of voting for candidates, every 2 years should do it.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[I]This morning, the non-partisan group, Government Accountability Institute (GAI) released its [URL="http://www.examiner.com/article/gai-report-exposes-obama-campaign-accepting-foreign-donations"]109 page report[/URL], the first ever analysis of election campaign donations issues called, “America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections?” raises indications the Obama campaign has potentially violated federal election law by failing to prevent the use of fraudulent or foreign credit card transactions on the official Obama for America [OFA] donation webpage. The use of the CVV number for donation transactions is non-existent by the Obama campaign among other suspicious activity.[/I]

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

[quote=RedskinRat;950587][I]This morning, the non-partisan group, Government Accountability Institute (GAI) released its [URL="http://www.examiner.com/article/gai-report-exposes-obama-campaign-accepting-foreign-donations"]109 page report[/URL], the first ever analysis of election campaign donations issues called, “America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections?” raises indications the Obama campaign has potentially violated federal election law by failing to prevent the use of fraudulent or foreign credit card transactions on the official Obama for America [OFA] donation webpage. The use of the CVV number for donation transactions is non-existent by the Obama campaign among other suspicious activity.[/I][/quote]

That's old news.

Re: 2012 Presidential Election (free for all edition)
 

thinking about putting up a canidate sign in my yard that says: "MITT is da SHITT"