Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)

- Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - Post game Packers (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=64180)

Re: Post game Packers

[quote=skinsfaninok;1201185]We'll take it and the W[/quote]

Exactly. Sure, the coaches/players can go back and focus on where they need to improve but when I, a fan, see a Skins win I'm generally pleased and satisfied. I could care less about the individual stats.

Re: Post game Packers

[quote=Schneed10;1201155]I think it's important that we get it right regarding #91. He's one of our best players and I don't want to see him disrespected on here.

Watch this. [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OK3IgwknNs[/url]

Please jump to the following times:

2:03 - pressure on Rodgers
5:41 - pressure on Rodgers around the edge, Rodgers being Rodgers escapes
8:13 - pancakes his guy in one second, but Rodgers gets rid of it on a 3 step drop
8:21 - busts through and draws a blatant hold

And not pictured here was at least one other blatant holding call where he destroyed the tackle off the ball and all the tackle could do was clothesline him around the neck.

When you guys watch football, don't just watch the results of the play. Don't just follow the ball with your eyes. Watch the trench play, see who's winning and gaining leverage. It's a better indicator of how the game will go overall.

When PFF puts out their evaluation of Kerrigan in this game you'll see he got plenty of pressures.

I thought we were a smarter fan base than this. I'm glad to see at least some of you on here still are. Kerrigan not only didn't play poorly, he played well.[/quote]

The one at 8:13 is F'in incredible ! Looks like some middle school highlights were a grown up kid destroys normal kids!

The hold at 8:21 is beyond holding, it's a wrestling move.

I think Kerrigan is having a way better beginning of season than last year. What are his grades against the run though? That would be my only knock on his piece of work.

[quote=KI Skins Fan] [...] Improbably, that sack came from Ryan Anderson, Frenchy's adopted son. [...] [/quote]

Haha I see you KI, I see you ! If you push, I'll turn this into my gimmick: [B]Ryan Anderson future HOF[/B], you saw it here first [SIZE="1"](and nowhere else ever probably)[/SIZE] !

[quote=Chico23231] [...] Also Mason Foster gets so overlooked...he's been really solid so far. [/quote]

I've been a Foster lover for 3 seasons, but this year he's on fire!

I really have no worries about our D. They've played really well across the board for 3 weeks.

7 of the 10 points and 64 of the 240 passing yards we allowed yesterday came on a blown coverage between Norman and Swearinger (think it's on DJ though, isn't it?).
Second week in a row this happens though (Hilton TD last week), if this can be corrected and avoider against the Saints, we'll be fine!

Re: Post game Packers

Adrian Peterson is fifth in the league for rushing yards at 236 yards, 4.2 ypc.

20 yards ahead of somebody named Saquon Barkley

Ballin

Re: Post game Packers

Kerrigan was on the field for 58 snaps and 41 of those was a pass rush and 3 of those resulted in a pressure all of which where hurries as I said earlier today.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: Post game Packers

Great all-around win. I'm slightly concerned about our rushing defense still in the fact it seems like the other teams get 0 yards or 12. I'd love to see them be a little more consistent in that. Overall, defense is vastly improved...

For all the questions about Doctson, does anyone else feel like the balls throw to him seem really inaccurate? Like, it's almost where it's just bad luck or something. It's like Smith seems accurate to everyone else and then throws a little bit out of reach of Doctson. Maybe he needs to start sacrificing enough to Jobu?

[IMG]https://media1.fdncms.com/clevescene/imager/is-very-bad-to-steal-jobus-rum-is-very/u/original/4544145/jobu.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Post game Packers

Did anyone else watch the Colts/Eagles game? Just wondered if their defensive line worked the Eagles like they did ours? Really trying to nail down how that all happened and hope it was just a scheme thing.

Re: Post game Packers

Another point to support Kerrigan: Scheme. I would wager with Allen, Payne and Matt I, the scheme for the week called for him to keep a gimpy Rodgers in the pocket. I think it worked for the most part.

Re: Post game Packers

The PI and defensive holding penalties all seemed like pretty fair calls. That to me is a good offense making its own luck. You could look at those as forced penalties.

Re: Post game Packers

[quote]When you look at the raw stats, you think Washington did great against the pass but struggled to stop the run. So far this season, teams have had more success on the ground than many predicted. But you have to put it all in context: By playing lighter in the box, Washington is challenging the opposing offense to try to push around its defensive linemen and linebackers to take advantage. And for the most part, the front seven is holding up so well that Washington doesn’t have to bring a safety forward. It helps the team allow fewer explosive plays in the passing game. The trade-off is a few more rushing yards, but not enough for it to matter.

[URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/redskins-might-finally-have-a-defense-they-can-build-upon-not-work-around/2018/09/24/2b4cbe4c-bfa1-11e8-90c9-23f963eea204_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2f45305e5224"]https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/redskins-might-finally-have-a-defense-they-can-build-upon-not-work-around/2018/09/24/2b4cbe4c-bfa1-11e8-90c9-23f963eea204_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2f45305e5224[/URL]
[/quote]

MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..

Re: Post game Packers

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection;1201212]Did anyone else watch the Colts/Eagles game? Just wondered if their defensive line worked the Eagles like they did ours? Really trying to nail down how that all happened and hope it was just a scheme thing.[/quote]

They played the eagles tough all game, made wentz look bad at times. Grades aren't up yet but the Colts D is much improved from last yr.

Re: Post game Packers

[url]http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr/_/week/1[/url]

Im into some stats today...total QBR for the season:

Alex at a very respectable 10

Cousins 14

Eli 19

Dak at a very garbage 28

Jimmy G was terrible before his injury ranking 30 in the league right behind Bradford who was ranked 29.

You know whats crazy?

Baker Mayfield had the second highest QBR performance of the year with his comeback vs the Jets. had a 95.5 QBR for his play in that game.

Re: Post game Packers

[quote=ethat001;1201215]MalcomConnection -- This is a great article about the rush D. Makes sense, we finally have big studs on DL / front 7 so we don't need to sacrifice secondary into the box. So if we wanted to stop the run, we could load up the box, but if we want to primarily stop the pass (on Rodgers and all the elite passers coming in) - we just go "light" in the box. Hope it continues, we have a string of QB studs coming in soon..[/quote]

Ahh, excellent, thanks!

Re: Post game Packers

[quote=skinsfaninok;1201216]They played the eagles tough all game, made wentz look bad at times. Grades aren't up yet but the Colts D is much improved from last yr.[/quote]

Good to know. And the Eagles offensive line is no joke either...

Re: Post game Packers

How about some love for Bergstrom?
No botched snaps and didn't get exposed out there.