Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

PostBroncos

The Broncos have started making their cuts. An NFL source says the team has waived NT Chris Baker. He was on the 53-man roster in '09. 1 minute ago via TweetDeck

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;727750]PostBroncos

The Broncos have started making their cuts. An NFL source says the team has waived NT Chris Baker. He was on the 53-man roster in '09. 1 minute ago via TweetDeck[/quote]

Scouts, Inc. Report on him:

Baker saw action in just one game during his rookie season and accumulated no stats. He is massive and powerful but needs a lot of technique work and must show that he can play through blocks as well as shed the block in time to make the play when at the point of attack.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

I don't know anything about him, but I have to say that I think Denver under Josh McD has not cared about talent as much as "my guy" so I would look at every player they cut... Also I wondered if this was a Shanahan pick.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;727752]I don't know anything about him, but I have to say that I think Denver under Josh McD has not cared about talent as much as "my guy" so I would look at every player they cut... Also I wondered if this was a Shanahan pick.[/quote]

No, Shanahan was dumped after the 2008-2009 season. Baker was a UDFA signed in the 2009 season.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

JasonLaCanfora

Hearing the Cowboys moving close to trading WR Patrick Crayton. Wouldn't be surprised if something is finalized shortly. half a minute ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Damn.. hate to see that. Really wanted him to hit the open market.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=SmootSmack;727735]Not actually a cut but a signing. Darnell Dockett signed a contract extension, I don't really know the terms but those wanting the local kid to come home next year, it's not happening[/quote]

It is a four year extension that has him in a Cardinals Uni till 2015.

They reproted on it last night during the game.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Crayton will be a Charger by the end of the day, if not sooner

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Adam_Schefter

Filed to ESPN: Dallas traded WR Patrick Crayton to San Diego. Chargers get another receiver that they could use. 1 minute ago via web

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Schefter also says it was for a 7th rd pick. Basically JJ didn't want us picking him up on waivers!

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

smart move by them, sucks for us!!

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;727771]Schefter also says it was for a 7th rd pick. Basically JJ didn't want us picking him up on waivers![/quote]
Wouldn't say that. They were just trying to get some value is all.

You could say that a 7th rounder is "camp fodder". But don't say it to Jay Ratliff.

Besides, Crayton was a 7th round pick anyway.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

well crap
we could have used him

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Someone at work said Betts was cut, guess the Broncos will take a look now

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=FRPLG;727783]well crap
we could have used him[/quote]

I don't think the cowgurls would've traded him the same divison I know it's been done before but he knows the OF.