![]() |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;672200]No one on the planet would trade up to 4 to take Clausen, but if either one of Suh and McCoy were left on the board, our phone would be ringing off the hook. Unless I got an [I]amazing[/I] offer, I'd take Suh or McCoy and feel like the luckiest team in the draft.[/quote]
Dude, if we ad one of these dt's to our dline, it is going to be sick. Of course with out any change to our oline, its is still sickly.. |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
No one actually wants to hear my thoughts on Brady Quinn, but if the choices end up being to trade a 4th or 5th round pick for Quinn's rights or to take Jimmy Clausen with the 4th overall pick, this seems like such a no brain-er that I would probably have to blacklist those who didn't agree with me.
|
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=Buster;672183]He took it as a Jr and scored 14, then again as a Sr and scored a respectable 28, same as Peyton Manning. So if anything, he's studious, as we've seen.
Heath Shuler had a 16...and is now helping run the country. Yikes. Check out that list I posted...a good score means nothing for football. :D[/quote] those type of scores are pitiful, I mean they're middle school level tests some of these guys probably couldn't even get enough on the asvab to go army infantry (not a knock on .mil) |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=GTripp0012;672212]No one actually wants to hear my thoughts on Brady Quinn, but if the choices end up being to trade a 4th or 5th round pick for Quinn's rights or to take Jimmy Clausen with the 4th overall pick, this seems like such a no brain-er that I would probably have to blacklist those who didn't agree with me.[/quote]
I imagine your thoughts on Quinn are the same as they were three years ago. Maybe we could get Tim Rattay to back him up? |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672208]Not sure what you mean[/quote]
yeah didn't word that too well the rumors are basically over, but it took awhile for it to get to the media? |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672214]I imagine your thoughts on Quinn are the same as they were three years ago. Maybe we could get Tim Rattay to back him up?[/quote]Or maybe we could trade up for Sam Bradford, and back him up with Jevan Snead and John Skelton :tongue
The shorthand version: for one-reason or another, all other options are sub-optimal to keeping Campbell, and playing him behind a rebuilt OL. But in terms of developmental prospects, Quinn would be one of many options that could be picked up at the cost of a mid-to-late rounder. And not all of those options are equal, according to me. |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
I'm intrigued about the possibility of signing Larry Johnson...wonder what he has in the tank?
|
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=GTripp0012;672219]Or maybe we could trade up for Sam Bradford, and back him up with Jevan Snead and John Skelton :tongue
The shorthand version: for one-reason or another, all other options are sub-optimal to keeping Campbell, and playing him behind a rebuilt OL. But in terms of developmental prospects, Quinn would be one of many options that could be picked up at the cost of a mid-to-late rounder. And not all of those options are equal, according to me.[/quote] I wouldn't trade up for Bradford, and I don't think Skelton fits here But I'd rather spend a 5th on Snead than trade one for Quinn. |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672223]I wouldn't trade up for Bradford, and I don't think Skelton fits here
But I'd rather spend a 5th on Snead than trade one for Quinn.[/quote]But...then we have Jevan Snead, and not Brady Quinn. |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=tryfuhl;672216]yeah didn't word that too well
the rumors are basically over, but it took awhile for it to get to the media?[/quote] Well rumors tend to pick up again after a dead period sometimes. But I also wouldn't say they take awhile to get to the media. I mean how do you think I hear most of this stuff. It can take a while to get from the media to the public because more often than not it's not worth bringing up |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=GTripp0012;672226]But...then we have Jevan Snead, and not Brady Quinn.[/quote]
Exactly |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672229]Exactly[/quote]Just clarifying.
|
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672228]Well rumors tend to pick up again after a dead period sometimes. But I also wouldn't say they take awhile to get to the media. I mean how do you think I hear most of this stuff. It can take a while to get from the media to the public because more often than not it's not worth bringing up[/quote]
I don't know, just figured some stuff didn't get reported, like you said. Either that or there are rumblings but they're waiting to report until there's something more solid instead of pulling a Florio. |
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
Bears just signed Eddie Williams, that's four former Redskins that have found work this past week now
|
Re: Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread
[quote=SmootSmack;672240]Bears just signed Eddie Williams, that's four former Redskins that have found work this past week now[/quote]Color me surprised. I figured that Randle El would get picked up, but that Mason/Williams/Collins/Yoder/Smoot would not get any play after release. So this, I think, does have meaning.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.