![]() |
Second place is the first loser
beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] Shh, you're embarassing yourself. You're running your mouth and nobody is listening to what's coming out and furthermore, nobody cares. Have a nice day. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
Here's several reasons why you should be shitting in your pants and instead you are applauding like a moron.
Bill Parcells is coming back. Age in dog years 150. Keyshawn Johnson age 34 Terry Glenn age 34 Drew Bledsoe age 33 By the way whose your Qb of the future or next year for that matter? |
Re: Second place is the first loser
ever hear the term diarrhea of the mouth,it really applies here
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
You'd trade places with us in a second -- need a hand down from your high horse?
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
sounds like a bitter cowboys fan
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
BigD, here's the thing. You may say the Redskins are like 31 other teams that didn't reach the ultimate goal, but the fact is, the Redskins are one of 12 teams good enough to qualify for "the second season", or playoffs if you don't know what i mean. That in itself is an accomplishment, no it's not winning the Super Bowl, but we still have a sense that it was a good year simply because we were a part of those 12 teams. The Cowboys can't say that they were a part of that, and that makes it so much better. At least we can say we had a shot at going to the Super Bowl after the season ended, unlike the Cowboys who never had a shot once the regular season was over.
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
That is such a worthless and non-sensical post that it really does not deserve a response. To say that every team that does not win the Super Bowl is in the same boat displays a fundamental misunderstanding of how you build a team and actually make Super Bowl runs (when was the last time the Boys won the big game by the way?). I guess he is just another one of these jokers who live in Redskins country and enjoy cheering for the Cowboys just to be as annoying as possible. He clearly does not understand the game of football and cannot appreciate a team that battled extremely hard and demonstrated that they had the heart to win 6 games in a row when the Cowboys couldn't pull it together to make a run. Where were the posts on the list after the Cowboys got smashed 35-7 at FedEx? Guess it is easy to criticize when the Skins lose but if I'm not mistaken they were playing on January 14 while the Cowboys are sitting at home in Irving and wondering what went wrong. All these Cowboys fans are total bandwagon folks anyway, they started cheering for the Boys when either Staubach or Aikman were winning Super Bowls so they just like finding a team that wins some games and jumping on board...why don't you go find a Cowboys board and spout off loser and stop trying to make yourself feel better with foolish posts...
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
As one human to another I mean it when I say I feel so bad for you BigD. I really do. Take care out there man.
:( |
Re: Second place is the first loser
Hey cowboyee fan
"You really should do something about that mumbling problem, I can't understand a word you are saying." ~In best Willy Wonka voice lol |
Re: Second place is the first loser
The thing is that the teams that got to play beyond week 17 had done enough right to make the playoffs and play for a few more weeks unlike those teams that didn't make the cut. So those teams are the first losers because their season ended before anyone elses did. The Skins season was 18 games long while the CowGirls only played 16 games. That group of teams that only played 16 are the true losers of the league and deal with it.
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Its sad how much Cowboys fans think we suck.
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
cowboys suck, shut up and go home
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
That had to be my favorite post of the day here--a cowroid fan, bitter about his own team's demise, comes here to post! You know you're doing something right when that's how roid fans spend their time! They don't even want to go to their own sites--oh, yeah--that's because THEIR SEASON ENDED TWO WEEKS AGO! lol!
Well, we see you 2 times next year, buddy. Until then--you can spend the offseason thinking about SANTANA MOSS. I know it haunts your dreams. It's ok... the bad man wont be back til next fall. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=Kaybee_7]Its sad how much Cowboys fans think we suck.[/QUOTE]
No, it's sad that you are concerned about what any dumb ass Cowboys fans think. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
Guys, stop feeding the troll!
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Only a Cowgirls fan would try to talk trash to the team that kept them out of the playoffs. :smashfrea
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Only a Cowgirls fan would try to talk trash to the team that kept them out of the playoffs. :smashfrea[/QUOTE]
Even a real Cowboy fan wouldn't spew that crap. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] :welcome: :silly: :pimp: :woot: :smashfrea :point: :lol: :towel: :woot: :welcome: :grouphug: :welcome: :rofl: :boxing: :welcome: :rofl: :grouphug: :rofl: :boxing: :welcome: :drink :welcome: :grouphug: :drink :bdh: :welcome: :grouphug: :funnypost :funnypost :funnypost :funnypost :funnypost :welcome: :grouphug: :welcome: :cheeky-sm :pimp: :owned: :smashfrea :woot: :headbange :point: :food-smil :towel: :yeahright :food-smil :towel: :laughing2 :smashfrea :woot: :welcome: :grouphug: :drink :welcome: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
:pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb
Just so you know second place is the first loser in a race. That is where that came from. Second place is actually the last loser in football. Stupid cowwhore fans. They need to grow brains. :D :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb :pi_lightb |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] Oh... 35-7... Uh oh. Whats that?! :spank: Don't be bitter cause you lost. Take it like a man. lol This coming from a girl. Oh double spank!! :spank: You got owned this season. Get over it. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
I hate that a Cowboy's fan said this... but he is right...... 2nd place Is the 1st Loser!!!!!!!
And the Skins had a great season but they are sitting at home watching just like the Eagles and cowboys....but Seattle isn't!!!!!!! |
Re: Second place is the first loser
we will own dallas for some more years unless parcells retires
ha ha ha dumbasss |
Re: Second place is the first loser
Haha...Cowboys fans are funny..
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. ... I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] Dude give us your name and address and we'll see if Danny S. can send you a nice big wide screen to watch the playoffs on for the next 5 yrs or so. You'll need considering who you're rooting for. P.S. Don't worry too much if that new TV would be playing "Hail to the Redskins" every time you'd turn it on and off. It's a catchy little tune and I'm sure you'd get use to it.:spank: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=railcon56@comcast.net]I hate that a Cowboy's fan said this... but he is right...... 2nd place Is the 1st Loser!!!!!!!
And the Skins had a great season but they are sitting at home watching just like the Eagles and cowboys....but Seattle isn't!!!!!!![/QUOTE] :postcop: he's not right. just like bigskinbauer said "2nd place is the LAST loser" because all the other teams have already lost before the superbowl. thats why only two teams play the last game, to determine the champion and the last loser of the season.:duel: whats funny is that dallas not only lost twice to the skins but they also became losers two weeks before the skins became losers.:towel: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] What I find funny is that this is comming from a fan of a team that LOST to the RAMS, and had to wait 2 weeks to be able to post something like this. Apparently he has to much time on his hands... I guess he should have alot of time to think on this, after all his team didn't make the playoffs, but I should not have to remind him of that fact!!!! :smashfrea :point: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]beating Dalls twice, going to the playoffs, and even barely beating Tampa Bay don't mean a thing because the only way that Redskins are going to be playing next sunday is if the Redskins fans play Madden 2006.
Yeah yeah, some of you are going to say that there is nothing like beating Dallas, not once but twice this season. Here is the thing though, we live in America, the greatest country ever, where there is no prize for second and third places like most other countries. The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played. "But that is none-sence, we are not as bad San Fransisco or the Texans....etc" you guys might say. Well guesse what, next weekend you are going to be doing the same thing they will be doing, watching other teams play. I live in Fairfax,VA and I had to listen to the coworkers every day wondering why and complaining about how no one in the media gives the Skins the respect they deserve. I called him, or at least tried to, yesterday to give him the answer but he wouldn't pick up his phone. I bet it feels good the whole deal with beating Dallas, but here is the thing. See we have been feeling like this for a long time. Thank you Joe Gibbs for trying to make it a rivalry again, because I was starting to believe that the big D sood for DOMINATION over the Redskins. Don't get used to it, cause Bill and the boy will be back next year.[/QUOTE] :blah: :hitfan: :lol: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]The fact of the matter is that you guys lost and that means you are just as bad as the 31 teams after the SB is played.
[/QUOTE] That is officially one of the strangest things I've read in my time on The Warpath. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
HAHAHAHAH....
Let me just say that I was lmao when I read the replies. Some of you said that you don't care about my message, well apparently you do. The reason why I am posting a messages here is because one of my co-workers would brag about the team (the Deadskins) and make me read messages posted here and he kept telling me that I should get a user name and start posting messages. So, the suggestion that I do this came from a Redskins fan. Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose. Am I bitter? you bet ya. I am not trying to hide it at all, here it is just in case you haven't figured it out yet " I HATE THE REDSKINS". But I am not stupid like some the people who posted replies to my message. For instance, someone corrected me and said the second place is the "last loser". WOW, good for you. I guess you would know from all those time that you finished second you first loser, I am sorry I meant "LAST LOSER". Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us. Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us.[/QUOTE]
We're in better shape because all you have is bledsoe(who isnt even good). You have no quarterback of the future and who knows if parcells is even going to draft one. [quote]Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa.[/QUOTE] look at indy and new england and cincinatti (all offensive teams) look at pittsburgh, they have a great defense, and so does denver and carolina chicago's and tampa's offenses were too crappy to survive in the playoffs |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]HAHAHAHAH....
Let me just say that I was lmao when I read the replies. Some of you said that you don't care about my message, well apparently you do. The reason why I am posting a messages here is because one of my co-workers would brag about the team (the Deadskins) and make me read messages posted here and he kept telling me that I should get a user name and start posting messages. So, the suggestion that I do this came from a Redskins fan. Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose. Am I bitter? you bet ya. I am not trying to hide it at all, here it is just in case you haven't figured it out yet " I HATE THE REDSKINS". But I am not stupid like some the people who posted replies to my message. For instance, someone corrected me and said the second place is the "last loser". WOW, good for you. I guess you would know from all those time that you finished second you first loser, I am sorry I meant "LAST LOSER". Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us. Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa.[/QUOTE] Sorry, I just need to clarify: Basically you're arguing that the Redskins are as bad as Dallas? |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose.[/QUOTE]
well duuuuuuuhhhhhhh by that theory we all could have ran over to a cowpork discussion board and started posted as early as week 2 of the regular season, now couldn't we? I feel sorry for you but your hate and anger are totally misplaced. You need to direct it towards your own team. IMHO, the Cowboys are a team that's been in a tailspin since Jerry 'It's My GD Team' Jones ran Jimmy Johnson out of Dallas. Johnson was the last great coach you guys had and that includes the likes of Switzer and Tuna. The only reason I lived for our glorious Redskins to pound the crap out you guys is because losing to your team was a true indication of how sorry we were. Come to think of it, you lost to us twice this year, and if we're that dam bad.... well it shouldn't really be said, but since you are such a class A idiot, I will... your team must really and truly suck sewer water! |
Re: Second place is the first loser
Wooped you twice and knocked you out of the playoffs,then you lost to the the Rams no more need to be said...
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]HAHAHAHAH....
Let me just say that I was lmao when I read the replies. Some of you said that you don't care about my message, well apparently you do. The reason why I am posting a messages here is because one of my co-workers would brag about the team (the Deadskins) and make me read messages posted here and he kept telling me that I should get a user name and start posting messages. So, the suggestion that I do this came from a Redskins fan. Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose. Am I bitter? you bet ya. I am not trying to hide it at all, here it is just in case you haven't figured it out yet " I HATE THE REDSKINS". But I am not stupid like some the people who posted replies to my message. For instance, someone corrected me and said the second place is the "last loser". WOW, good for you. I guess you would know from all those time that you finished second you first loser, I am sorry I meant "LAST LOSER". Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us. Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa.[/QUOTE] ..... I sense trouble brewing on Brokeback Mountain.... |
Re: Second place is the first loser
I personnally like the fact you have the nuts to post here, and hopefully you will continue.
Lets clarify a few things. 2nd place is the loser of the Super Bowl. We have finished in 8th place which entiltes us to a lower round draft pick then the cowboys. So finishing worse then us enables you a better draft pick which would mean they are trying to make you a better team by giving you a shot at better players. So really in the NFL we are all not tied when it comes to losing but we are rated based on our record and playoff success. Your offensive play calling was incrediblly inept. JJ is not the back you guys claimed him to be, I would label him a bust. QB should retire as concrete feet is worthless. Oline, this is a major weakness for you all and that is well documented. TE is probally your best player. At WR you guys have one decent guy Glen, and he is starting to get slow. Keeshawn, is not worth arguing cause even our 6th reciever Farris is better and that is not saying much. Who do we need on Offense, a 2nd WR and depth at O-line. Defense, you guys have great young talent but are thin at the LB position. Your coach defiently sucks. We need one more corner and a DE. Well our coach is pretty good. So you gys have alot further to go then us. So keep posting but at least have the courtsey not to trash talk, talk facts and discuss and you might be accepted into this community. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
sore loser, sour grapes, waste of time.
you weren't here before, convenient of you to show up now. I know you're pissed at your sorry team, but that doesn't make being an arse any less excusable. Grow up. |
Re: Second place is the first loser
[QUOTE=TheBigD]
Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose. Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us. Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa.[/QUOTE] First off lets get this straight your D is ok, everyone knows, thanks to Mr. Moss & Co., that your poor excuse of a saftey Roy "I can't cover if my life depended on it" Williams sucks. Sure he can hit and he also has that rare talent of letting opposing WR's burn him. And your corners, Newsome and Henery are average. As for offense I think that we are in better shape than Dallas, after all we have a running game with a real running back, not one that just appears when he feels like it. Sure we are now a 1 man show but that is what is great about our situation we only need to find ONE receiver, as opposed to finding a QB, RB, and 2 WR's, because Meshawn and Glenn are not getting any younger and history shows that WR's over like 33 or 34 go down hill fast. :smashfrea :vomit: :duel: |
Re: Second place is the first loser
I find this whole post to be "none - sence"
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Now I won't say that I don't check other team's boards to see what the general sentiment is, HOWEVER I ESPECIALLY don't post spouting off at the mouth to a team that generally ravaged mine. I'm especially entertained at the fact that this FOOTBALL GAME caused you so much anguish that you decided to seek out a Redskins site just to post some blah-blah crap. It makes me all rainbows and puppy dogs inside to know that someone takes the game so seriously it's ruined the next few months for them because they lost to my favorite team.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.