Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[B]Redskins | Team still under the salary cap[/B]
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:44:46 -0800
[URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/177"]David Elfin[/URL], of the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/144"]Washington Times[/URL], reports after numerous signings and contract changes, the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/37/nfl"]Washington Redskins[/URL]' salary cap number is at $97.574 million, leaving $4.426 million to spend on signing their draft picks and filling other needs.

[B]Redskins | Team will visit with K. Wright[/B]
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:35:22 -0800
[URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/177"]David Elfin[/URL], of the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/144"]Washington Times[/URL], reports the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/37/nfl"]Washington Redskins[/URL] will visit with free agent CB [URL="http://www.kffl.com/player/1087/nfl"]Kenny Wright[/URL] (Jaguars) Wednesday, March 22.



so if we want to sign lloyd (1.5-2mill), 3 backups and a #2 with some low picks, someone is probably going to have to restructure.



K Wright is 6'1" and a good tackling CB. not a blazer, but he'd be a good #3.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

Lloyd is already signed for this year... they're trying to sign him to an extension.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

(Please read with a Jim Mora voice) Draft picks? Draft picks? What draft picks?

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

if k wright is a good tackling corner,he is definitly a step above w harris already

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]if k wright is a good tackling corner,he is definitly a step above w harris already[/QUOTE]

The problem with Walt Harris wasn't tackling, it was with pass coverage.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=EEich]Lloyd is already signed for this year... they're trying to sign him to an extension.[/quote]

thats what i meant. I doubt they're going to leave him on a one year deal though unless they REALLY have questions about his character (and if they did, why give up draft picks for him?)

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

The Skins don't need much money for draft picks. They will need to spend some on their #2, but then they jump to 4's 5's and 6 round picks. Some of those late round picks won't make the team anyway. They are in good shape. I would think they are looking at how they can keep costs down on what will be back-ups at this point.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=scowan]The Skins don't need much money for draft picks. They will need to spend some on their #2, but then they jump to 4's 5's and 6 round picks. Some of those late round picks won't make the team anyway. They are in good shape. I would think they are looking at how they can keep costs down on what will be back-ups at this point.[/quote]

no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

That Guy -- I like how youve been posting these "Redskins Notes" daily. Its much appreciated, thanks!

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=amorentz]That Guy -- I like how youve been posting these "Redskins Notes" daily. Its much appreciated, thanks![/quote]

no problem ;) they're in the FA thread, but i figure people don't read those, so redskin stuff should get a bit more attention.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=That Guy]no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)[/quote]

That Guy, thanks for setting me straight on our picks. Wow, our coaches don't even need to show up much on that first day (Saturday) of the draft. Maybe we can trade that 2nd round pick for a good OLB or OL and then they can take the day off and wait for Sunday!

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

Man I wish Ty Law would switch agents, I would love to see him as the Nickle or in a rotation with the other corners. He is physical and fits right into the scheme that we play.

Too badd it won't happen

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=That Guy]no 4's. 2,5,6,6,6,7,(+projected 7 comp)[/quote]

I can definitely see us trading some of those picks to move up a bit.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=diehardskin2982]Man I wish Ty Law would switch agents, I would love to see him as the Nickle or in a rotation with the other corners. He is physical and fits right into the scheme that we play.

Too badd it won't happen[/quote]

law wants a LOT of money and he's still a #1, no way he'd agree to come in and play a nickel corner.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[B]Redskins | Team had some talks with N. Wayne[/B]
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:03:56 -0800

Howard Bryant, of the Washington Post, reports the Washington Redskins have had some talks with free agent LB Nate Wayne (Lions), but it is unclear if the team has continued the conversation.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

That guy! The one-stop spot for all FA news and info! Thanks man. Keep it up!

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

thanks for the updates that guy.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

didnt ty law sign?

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]didnt ty law sign?[/QUOTE]
Not that I know of, hell I havent even heard anyone that is intersested in him. I guess the dolphins were, but that way before FA even started, and since they just signed W. Allen, I doubt that Law will want to go there and be a #2 or #3 guy, or even if the fins can afford him...

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=Redskins8588]Not that I know of, hell I havent even heard anyone that is intersested in him. I guess the dolphins were, but that way before FA even started, and since they just signed W. Allen, I doubt that Law will want to go there and be a #2 or #3 guy, or even if the fins can afford him...[/quote]

law said he'd also be willing to play FS. I think money is his main concern and, of course, anyone willing to pay him is going to want him starting.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I can definitely see us trading some of those picks to move up a bit.[/QUOTE]

What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=Beemnseven]What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.[/quote]

Of course not, I'm not talking about a huge trade up, but they'll probably do something like package 2 6th rounders for a 5th, or a 5th and a 6th for a 4th.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

but with the talent depth i really cant see them doing that. why not just ttake a chance on the later round players and get a multitude of them?

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=PWNED]but with the talent depth i really cant see them doing that. why not just ttake a chance on the later round players and get a multitude of them?[/quote]

all depends on who's out there, who they're targeting, etc.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=Beemnseven]What would three 6th round picks be worth? A third? I doubt it.[/quote]

draft pick trade value chart:
[url]http://www.thehuddlereport.com/NickelPackage/tradevaluechart.htm[/url]
-not definitive for all trades, but it is a good idea of general pick value.

NFL draft order:
[url]http://nfl.com/draft/story/9137410[/url]
-there are 3 teams at 10-6 and they pick 20, 21, and 22nd in every round. We start with the 22nd pick, because we had the hardest strength of schedule, but every round teams with even records cycle. for example, we're pick 22 in the 3rd, but in the 2nd we cycle up to pick 21, then in the 3rd we cycle up again to pick 20. In the 4th, we go back to the bottom of the 10-6 teams and pick 22nd again.

without comp picks included we have picks 53, 149, 164, 180, 187, and 214.

Projected comp picks:
[url]http://www.kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163280&highlight=COMP+PICKS[/url]
-this guy is really good and comp picks have to be factored into trade value. Even though comp picks cannot be traded, they lower the value of EVERY tradeable pick in and below the 4th round.


round 1 -> 32 picks (0 comp) (1-32)
round 2 -> 32 picks (0 comp) (32-64)
round 3 -> 33 picks (1 comp) (65-97)
round 4 -> 37 picks (5 comp) (98-134)
round 5 -> 38 picks (6 comp) (135-172)
round 6 -> 36 picks (4 comp) (173-208)
round 7 -> 48 picks (16 comp) (209-256)


we have: (left most number is trade value, followed by overall draft position)
VAL, OVR, pick info
370., 053, rnd 2 pick 21
30.4, 155, rnd 5 pick 21
22.0, 176, rnd 6 pick 4 (jets, ramsey)
15.6, 192, rnd 6 pick 20
12.8, 199, rnd 6 pick 27 (panthers, gardner)
2.40, 230, rnd 7 pick 22
N/A , 249, rnd 7 pick 41 (of 48) (comp)

totalled up that's 453.2 for everything, or 83.2 for our day 2 picks.

that's enough to trade everything to move up 8 spots to pick #45or trade the 3 6s for a 4th rounder, near pick 19.

It's probably better to just sit pat and take whoever is available and hope with 6 low picks 1 turns out to be a winner.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

i agree. just make a bunch of selections because theres definitely no guarantee that a 4th/5th rounder would work out any better.

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=That Guy][B]Redskins | Team still under the salary cap[/B]
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:44:46 -0800
[URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/177"]David Elfin[/URL], of the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/144"]Washington Times[/URL], reports after numerous signings and contract changes, the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/37/nfl"]Washington Redskins[/URL]' salary cap number is at $97.574 million, leaving $4.426 million to spend on signing their draft picks and filling other needs.

[B]Redskins | Team will visit with K. Wright[/B]
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:35:22 -0800
[URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/177"]David Elfin[/URL], of the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/link/144"]Washington Times[/URL], reports the [URL="http://www.kffl.com/team/37/nfl"]Washington Redskins[/URL] will visit with free agent CB [URL="http://www.kffl.com/player/1087/nfl"]Kenny Wright[/URL] (Jaguars) Wednesday, March 22.



so if we want to sign lloyd (1.5-2mill), 3 backups and a #2 with some low picks, someone is probably going to have to restructure.



K Wright is 6'1" and a good tackling CB. not a blazer, but he'd be a good #3.[/quote]

Caught a lot of Jags games last year. Everyone talks about how much they needed a second corner, but Kenny Wright was shutdown at times. Very underrated, would be satisfied with a nickel role and would come cheap. Very plausible option

Re: Redskins Notes (3/22)
 

[quote=GTripp0012]Caught a lot of Jags games last year. Everyone talks about how much they needed a second corner, but Kenny Wright was shutdown at times. Very underrated, would be satisfied with a nickel role and would come cheap. Very plausible option[/quote]

he does fit the description of a GW (tall, tackling) CB.