A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

On the Ultimate Depth chart they have us winning the division. Salisbury even complemented our coaching staff. They have us at #3 in the NFC (at least for the playoff spots) behind Carolina and Seattle, respectively.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

that would be sweet. it means a home playoff game!

****minus 5 and counting****

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz]On the Ultimate Depth chart they have us winning the division. Salisbury even complemented our coaching staff.[/quote]

Oh gawd! A Salisbury compliment is a kiss of death!:oink:

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=Master4Caster]Oh gawd! A Salisbury compliment is a kiss of death!:oink:[/quote]

that doesnt change the fact that he is gay...and by gay i mean no offense to homosexuals...i just mean he is flamer gay...

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

I told y'all I'd slowly make my presence felt at ESPN....Warpath! What!!

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

I don't mean to be the barer of bad news but shit happens in this league that can turn a winning team to a stinking team. Hell, Caroline is one player (Smith) away from turning it a perennial stinker for the season. It happened couple of years ago and MeShawn can't save them.


The moral of my post? We can win on paper, but I only get paid if we win on the field and ESPN can go to hell.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

yes.... still a flamer....

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

What happened to the Cowboy lovers??

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=Mattyk72]What happened to the Cowboy lovers??[/quote]

they have them as the second wild card team. That means the g-string divas are out of the picture.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

the way espn has it, the cowboys will be coming to fed-ex for wildcard weekend.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=gibbsisgod]the way espn has it, the cowboys will be coming to fed-ex for wildcard weekend.[/quote]

How great would that be?

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

I think thats funny that they have Dallas ahead of the Giants. I guess we all will find out very soon. In my book its the Giants over Dallas. Skins will be the NFCs darlings this season. Ill give them the #1 or 2 spot and also collect a first round bye.
Damn Im ready!

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

After breaking down the teams and ranking the Skins so high, they would have looked like complete idiots if they turned around and said they would finish behind Dallas and NY.

Thought it is odd they have the Giants ranked 8th overall and Dallas 14th overall, yet they still go with Dallas.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

where is this ultimate depth chart crap everyones talkin about

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[url]http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/story?id=2502031[/url]

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=Mattyk72]After breaking down the teams and ranking the Skins so high, they would have looked like complete idiots if they turned around and said they would finish behind Dallas and NY.

Thought it is odd they have the Giants ranked 8th overall and Dallas 14th overall, yet they still go with Dallas.[/quote]

Yeah....6 ranking points different but still going with Dallas? Can you say contradiction?
I think the Giants have a much better team than many pundits think. On the other hand, Dallas I think is a much worse team than many pundits think.
The season will tell. I still like the Redskins going in a bit of an underdog though. No respect for a team that is very good, breeds hunger to prove tha you deserve to be noticed.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz]they have them as the second wild card team. That means the g-string divas are out of the picture.[/quote]Same here, and I think Atlanta or TB gets a wild card, no big surprises predictions in the NFC for me...unless you count Arizona taking the west.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

Chargers run defense really that good? LIGHTS OUT MERRIMAN.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

What about our run defense. Will that problem be fixed? We gave up a whole yard more in 2005 than we did in 04, from 3.1 to 4.1. 3.1 was by far the best in 04 with teams getting only as close as 3.6 ypp where as in 05 4.1 ranked us a disgusting 22. Our D was so good in 04 against the run, this year the best was 3.4. What happened? Was it pierce? Can it be fixed? Will carter help? I want that fixed. It was a problem for us last year. Total against the run went from 2 to 13. We are ranked 14th by ESPN and that is holding us back and it will hold us back against tiki and others. Luckily i don't think we play that many good running backs. Ofcourse that doesn't matter because we are going against GOD at the near end of the season.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=BigSKINBauer]What about our run defense. Will that problem be fixed? We gave up a whole yard more in 2005 than we did in 04, from 3.1 to 4.1. 3.1 was by far the best in 04 with teams getting only as close as 3.6 ypp where as in 05 4.1 ranked us a disgusting 22. Our D was so good in 04 against the run, this year the best was 3.4. What happened? Was it pierce? Can it be fixed? Will carter help? I want that fixed. It was a problem for us last year. Total against the run went from 2 to 13. We are ranked 14th by ESPN and that is holding us back and it will hold us back against tiki and others. Luckily i don't think we play that many good running backs. Ofcourse that doesn't matter because we are going against GOD at the near end of the season.[/quote]

not quite sure what all that meant ;) what happened was warrick holdman. washington-marshall-pierce was WAY better than washington-marshall-holdman. Clark also got pushed out of the way on some runs as well. Archuleta shouldn't let that happen, but we will have a rookie at ROLB this year, so whether that gap in run D gets fixed is still a question... mcintosh is good at making negative yardage plays though.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

i think our run defense was fine last year with the exception of giving up a few big plays. in this defense that is something that is going to be hard to fix unless the guys realize the importance of being in position

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

I remember it getting better later in the season. early on i felt sick with all the big plays we were giving up. I wasn't used to people picking up big amounts all at once on the ground against this d.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[QUOTE=gibbsisgod]the way espn has it, the cowboys will be coming to fed-ex for wildcard weekend.[/QUOTE]
Is anyone else sporting a little chub just thinking about that?

Just me?


Oh-kay.....

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[QUOTE=ArtMonkDrillz]On the Ultimate Depth chart they have us winning the division. Salisbury even complemented our coaching staff. They have us at #3 in the NFC (at least for the playoff spots) behind Carolina and Seattle, respectively.[/QUOTE]
That's also third overall in the NFL. The Patriots are 4th and that puts them at the top in the AFC.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]i think our run defense was fine last year with the exception of giving up a few big plays. in this defense that is something that is going to be hard to fix unless the guys realize the importance of being in position[/QUOTE]

yeah, I think you're right. The first Giants game where Tiki racked up 200+ yards didn't help. Then there was a long run we gave up in the 49er game. Big gainers here and there were the difference in '05. In '04, all the cracks were sealed tight, everyone seemed to be in precise position, and as a result, almost nobody got through for a long run.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

Griffin is the key to our run D. When he was out of the lineup the run D really suffered.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

Whenver I see Sean Salisibury speaking, I think to myself "He knows he is only qualified to unclog toilets as a janitor at a fat kids camp." --No dis to janitor/fat kids for being referred in same sentence.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[QUOTE=MightyJoeGibbs]Whenver I see Sean Salisibury speaking, I think to myself "He knows he is only qualified to unclog toilets as a janitor at a fat kids camp." --No dis to janitor/fat kids for being referred in same sentence.[/QUOTE]

Personally, I think Salisbury is the personification of Uncle Rico.
- "Here sport, try and break this. Can't can you?"

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

seattle at #2 lol. get them in a half decent division and see how good they are

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[QUOTE=saden1]Hell, Caroline is one player (Smith) away from turning it a perennial stinker for the season. [/QUOTE]

I don't think its possible to do anything perenially for one season

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz]On the Ultimate Depth chart they have us winning the division. Salisbury even complemented our coaching staff. They have us at #3 in the NFC (at least for the playoff spots) behind Carolina and Seattle, respectively.[/quote]



:food-smil So who did they have winning it last year ,I know it was'nt the Giants !:Smoker:

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote]seattle at #2 lol. get them in a half decent division and see how good they are[/quote]

Beat us didn't they?

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=Big C]seattle at #2 lol. get them in a half decent division and see how good they are[/quote]

they still managed to beat us when it mattered.


we did trash their #1 AND #2 WRs for weeks the first time and their #1 all star RB the 2nd time though, so i guess better competition would have beat them up like the way we limped into that game too.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=Mattyk72]After breaking down the teams and ranking the Skins so high, they would have looked like complete idiots if they turned around and said they would finish behind Dallas and NY.

Thought it is odd they have the Giants ranked 8th overall and Dallas 14th overall, yet they still go with Dallas.[/quote]

Dam ,you caught that too ?Like I said before who they pick last year,it was'nt New York.

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

[quote=saden1]I don't mean to be the barer of bad news but shit happens in this league that can turn a winning team to a stinking team.[/quote]

I don't agree, I totally understand your point, but the difference between a great team and good is the fact that the great team can still move on if that key player is lost.

But I know what your saying, if we lose a big time skin it might be tough to compete in the NFC East, but my point is a team is a team, and not just one player. You really can't blame injuries for bad season. I think the skins are deep enough to do well despite injuries. Hell, look at GW has done with our D-line...

Re: A Change of Tune for ESPN
 

Honestly, I think we're better than BOTH Carolina and Seattle.

The Seahawks lost some key players in the off-season and we beat them once last year and nearly again in the playoffs. The Panthers never had the talent besides Steve Smith. They're a one-trick pony.

The only team that COULD possibly be ranked ahead of us in the NFC is the Giants, but I'd really have to debate that one also as we're really evenly-matched teams. (Portis/Barber, WRs, DEF depth/QBs may make the difference for both teams with Brunell having the advantage over Manning)