![]() |
MaGahee to Baltimore
For 3 picks. 2 third rounders (one in '08) and a seventh. Seems like a pretty good deal for both sides.
[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2791831]ESPN.com - NFL - Bills trade McGahee to Ravens for draft picks[/url] |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Wow -- Ozzie Newsome is a great GM -- that is a huge upgrade over Jamal.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
That is a great move by the Ravens.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
I'm not a huge McGahee fan, but the Ravens got him for the equivalent of a 2nd rounder (pretty good).
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Now that's a FO for ya!
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
I wonder what the Bills will do at RB now.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=SmootSmack;285946]I wonder what the Bills will do at RB now.[/quote]
Doesn't matter, they now have a $49 million guard! |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[QUOTE=SmootSmack;285946]I wonder what the Bills will do at RB now.[/QUOTE]
My guess is they sign Sultan McCullough to a 5 year $94M deal with a $30M signing bonus. |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Maybe they will make a trade to move up in the draft to land Adrian Peterson?
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Well.... OJ needs the money... maybe the Bills could lure him out of retirement.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Some rumors circulating that the Bills might send some of those picks to San Diego for Michael Turner.
I defer to TheWarpath.net San Diego Correspondent Jamf for more info |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
turner would be a good move.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
I really like this move. I've always liked McGahee and the number of reasons to watch the Ravens is now growing. I'm still not sold just because I usually hate the obnoxious fans, but since I'll be moving to BMore, it might not kill me to have them on tv.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
I wonder what Clinton Portis' value on the open market would be today? A #2?
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[QUOTE=B.F. SKINner;286069]I wonder what Clinton Portis' value on the open market would be today? A #2?[/QUOTE]
I would think it would be a mid-to-low 1st rounder. McGahee's trade value was hurt by the fact that it was well known that he was looking for an out. Moreover, a team that traded for Portis would have him on a long-term deal with no dead money if they chose to cut him. Although Portis' deal is a pricey one in 2006 dollars, it's not so pricey today. |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=B.F. SKINner;286069]I wonder what Clinton Portis' value on the open market would be today? A #2?[/quote]
No way, more like a #1. This year is going to be a statement year for CP I do believe. Just think CP & LB that's one heck of a one, two punch. :Smoker: |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
does buffalo have anything of value? maybe we can trade betts for.....
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=dmek25;286101]does buffalo have anything of value? maybe we can trade betts for.....[/quote]
Buffalo? they've trade darn near the whole team. Trade BETTS are you kiddin? Why in the world would you think that's a smart move? I sure don't. |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Betts for Dockery.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
the bills need trung candidate
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=skinsfan_nn;286105]Buffalo? they've trade darn near the whole team.
Trade BETTS are you kiddin? Why in the world would you think that's a smart move? I sure don't.[/quote] in my opinion, rock cartwright, or someone else, can handle the 8-10 carries a game that ladell betts is going to get. and he also fumbles alittle too much for my liking |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Trading Betts is our best move IMO. His value will never be so high and I trust Rock or Sellers to carry the load when he's out shortly. We could draft a RB late in this draft or next draft.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
i hate to admit it but i agree with dmek, not trading betts now does risk letting his stock drop considering his butter fingers. And last time i checked when rock stepped in for a couple carries he killed it.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
This is a good pickup by the Ravens.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
if we were going to trade betts, the value would have been better two weeks ago when more teams were still looking for backs.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
I wish two third rounders were all we had to give up for Portis.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=dmek25;286165]in my opinion, rock cartwright, or someone else, can handle the 8-10 carries a game that ladell betts is going to get. and he also fumbles alittle too much for my liking[/quote]
I am sorry, but Rock will not be able to produce what Ladell can for us. Trading Betts would be a mistake. Portis, and Betts are going to be a great one-two punch for us next year. |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
[quote=RMSkins;286632]I am sorry, but Rock will not be able to produce what Ladell can for us. Trading Betts would be a mistake. Portis, and Betts are going to be a great one-two punch for us next year.[/quote]
when betts went down under spurrier, rock did pretty well. I don't think the YPC were very far apart. |
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
great move by baltimore. Newsome is a great gm. We give up the best cb and a number 2 pick for a a rb. Wish we could get newsome here. I hate baltimore but was a great move.
|
Re: MaGahee to Baltimore
Cartwright is a very solid back. The problem with trading Betts is that we would have to select a RB on day two to replace Betts on the roster. A guy who we can trust with carries if either Portis or Rock goes down.
Trading Ladell becomes an issue ONLY if Portis can't start a game. Rock could start in his place, but what happens when you want to run the ball 30 times a game? You are really stretching Rocks ability. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.