![]() |
Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]In this thread, CrazyCanuck and I will periodically update the Salary Cap status of the Washington Redskins. As players restructure, resign, are signed as free agents, drafted, cut, and traded, we will do our best to keep the community updated on the cap implications of each transaction. This thread is also designed to house analysis and insight regarding the Redskins' likely course of action in free agency and the draft. The salary cap can often provide an indication of the team's intended approach to free agency - aggressive vs passive, etcetera.[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]In short, the numbers in the table below illustrate that [B]the Redskins are $9.4 million under the cap as of [/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][B]Saturday March 7th, 2:00 PM[/B][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]. The moves listed below illustrate how The Warpath expects the team to operate in the offseason.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Numbers presented below are in millions:[/FONT][/COLOR] [quote] [B][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Current Status[/FONT][/COLOR] - Updated [/B][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][B]Saturday March 7th, 2:00 PM[/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]2009 Cap Fees for Redskins' Top 51: $107.5[/FONT][/COLOR] [U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]2009 Redskins Dead Cap Money: $11.5[/FONT][/COLOR][/U] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]2009 Redskins Cap Total: $119.0[/FONT][/COLOR] [U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]2009 Redskins Salary Cap Limit: $128.4[/FONT][/COLOR][/U] [SIZE=3][B][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Current 2009 Redskins Cap Room: [COLOR=black]$9.4 million[/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR][/B][/SIZE] [B][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Expected Signings - savings[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][B][COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana](hit)[/FONT][/COLOR][/B] Other Offensive Lineman [COLOR=red]($3.5)[/COLOR] [FONT=Verdana]DL or LB[COLOR=red] ($2.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] Phillip Daniels [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=red]($2.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=red][COLOR=black]Pete Kendall [/COLOR]($1.5)[/COLOR][/FONT][COLOR=red] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=black]Khary Campbell[/COLOR] ($1.0)[/FONT] [/COLOR][FONT=Verdana]Rookies [COLOR=red]($2.5)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Players Removed from Top 51 $3.3[/FONT] [B][FONT=Verdana]Total Expected Signings [COLOR=red]($9.2)[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] [SIZE=3][B][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Warpath’s Projected 2009 Redskins Cap Room: $0.2 million[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][/SIZE] [B][U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Other Ways to Reduce the Cap Number:[/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Symbol]·[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Cut or trade Casey Rabach (clear another $2.3 million)[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Symbol]·[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Cut or trade James Thrash (clear another $0.85 million)[/FONT][/COLOR] [/quote] [quote] [B][U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Summary of Executed Transactions:[/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][FONT=Verdana]Andre Carter: $0.83 Expected Savings, $2.4 Actual[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] Savings [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Carter was extended as opposed to a simple restructure as expected.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Antwaan Randle El: $0.59 Expected Savings, $2.0 Actual Savings[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Randle El was extended as opposed to a simple restructure as expected.[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT] Ethan Albright: Signed to a one-year contract for veteran minimum as expected. Marcus Washington: $4.5 Expected Savings, $4.5 Actual Savings Washington was released as forecasted. Chris Samuels: $0 Expected, $2.4 Actual Savings Samuels was extended, adding a team option to pick up the 2011-14 years. Cornelius Griffin: $2.0 Expected Savings, $2.3 Actual Savings Griffin was extended as expected, but the cap savings were greater than anticipated. Anthony Montgomery: [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR] Actual Hit Tendered as expected. Kedric Golston: [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($1.5)[/COLOR] Actual Hit Tendered as expected. Shaun Suisham: [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR] Actual Hit Tendered as expected. Phillip Daniels: $2.0 Expected Savings, $2.3 Actual Savings Contract voided as expected. Albert Haynesworth: [COLOR=red]($7.0)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($7.0)[/COLOR] Actual hit Signed as forecasted. DeAngelo Hall: [COLOR=red]($4.0)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($5.2)[/COLOR] Actual Hit Re-Signed as forecasted. Shawn Springs: $0 Expected, $6.0 Actual Savings Springs was released, presumably to allow cap space for offensive line recruitment. Derrick Dockery: [COLOR=red]($3.5)[/COLOR] Expected Hit, [COLOR=red]($3.2)[/COLOR] Actual Hit Dockery was signed to a contract similar to that of Fred Smoot. Welcome home, 66. Jason Taylor: $0 Expected, $8.5 Actual Savings Taylor was released after he and the team apparently couldn't come to an agreement on a restructured deal. Dirk Johnson: $0.46 Actual Signed. [B][U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Washington[/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/B][B][U][COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana] Redskins Rookie Pool Allotment:[/FONT][/COLOR][/U][/B] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]When available, the rookie pool will be posted here.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/quote]Cap status updated as of [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana][B]Saturday March 7th, 2:00 PM[/B][/FONT][/COLOR]. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Do you have a ballpark dollar "limit" for what we can spend in FA this year? I'm guessing we need to go out and get either a starting OLB or starting strong side DE and possibly a starting o-lineman. Does it look as though we'll have the cash?
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Man looking at the numbers if we restructure Springs even for half what he's currently due, that dude better play close to 16 games next year (and beyond). He's been spoiled rotten IMO and somehow would almost rather just see him cut. Nobody going to pay him close to what he's made here.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Thanks for the information. I still don't understand the cap that well and your salary cap posts are always a huge help.
Do you think you can help me with my taxes?? HAIL!! |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=SkinzzFan;518420][B]Thanks for the information. I still don't understand the cap that well and your salary cap posts are always a huge help.[/B]
Ditto. Def one of the things I love about this site. Do you think you can help me with my taxes?? :laughing- HAIL!![/quote] Hail (i had to say something here to post?) |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
The story of the plan laid out is basically this:
- The Skins are $3.0 million over the cap, with 46 players under contract. - Because I'm assuming the 30% Rule is in effect, the Skins can only clear about $2 million in space with contract restructures. - They can then cut Marcus Washington to clear $4.5. - They can extend or cut Springs and Jason Taylor to clear more space. Cutting them clears the most, but from everything I hear and read, Springs is still viewed as an intregal component of the defense, and last year Vinny said Jason Taylor would be around more than one season. - They will have about $10 million in space to sign players. But they need a kicker, and then they need to tender Golston, Montgomery, and Doughty. Then they need to get Albright and Demetric Evans resigned. Then they need to plan on an amount to sign rookies, and I'm assuming they want to resign Hall. They also need to replace Kendall. In the end, I expect them to eat up all $10 million just from resigning their own guys and draft picks. I don't see them having space to buy any free agents, unless they make deeper roster cuts than what I'm predicting here, or unless they choose to forego DeAngelo Hall. Much can change over the coming weeks, so CC and me will keep this thread updated. The purpose of this thread is to educate the community, so feel free to ask questions. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Good stuff Schneed, keep it coming. Also a big thanks to CC as well for putting together the cap sheets.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
There is a saying. " God does for you what you can't (or won't) do for yourself." Looks like we're being forced (led?) to address our lines and build through the draft. :)
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Mattyk72;518427]Good stuff Schneed, keep it coming. Also a big thanks to CC as well for putting together the cap sheets.[/quote]
Yeah man good point, it's his information I'm using (and I should note one more time, his sheets are exactly what drew me to this site). Digging into the information and comparing to other Salary Cap info around the web on the Skins, I can tell you that CC's information is crazy accurate, even more accurate than the source JLC quotes on Redskins Insider. Whatever you're paying CC, it ain't enough! He's the man. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
If we cut Marcus but can't replace him in FA it's either Blades or a rookie starting right? That doesn't sound good. Blades can probably handle it but we def need another solid backup (maybe they see progress in Fincher).
I hear what is being said about Springs importance to the D but jeez he is expensive and if we sign Hall... just a lot of talent in the secondary when the LB corp looks pretty shallow. I'm trying to be objective but have to admit I like Marcus' character over Springs from what I know of the two guys. This is just seems like a bummer situation... |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
I've got it... Taylor should play for free in '09. It's pretty fair.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=The Goat;518430]If we cut Marcus but can't replace him in FA it's either Blades or a rookie starting right? That doesn't sound good. Blades can probably handle it but we def need another solid backup (maybe they see progress in Fincher).
I hear what is being said about Springs importance to the D but jeez he is expensive and if we sign Hall... just a lot of talent in the secondary when the LB corp looks pretty shallow. I'm trying to be objective but have to admit I like Marcus' character over Springs from what I know of the two guys. This is just seems like a bummer situation...[/quote] That was the hard part of laying out this scenario, ultimately I don't know who the Skins will decide to part with. It could be Washington, it could be Taylor, it could be Springs, it could be all three. So it's hard to tell, I'm just going on my best guess. But if anything, this shows how tight things will be for the 'Skins if we don't get a new CBA. They'll be limited in free agency, and forced to make some tough roster decisions. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Spot on. My only point is this: an increase in the Salary Cap by $7 million implys that defined gross revenues for the NFL increased by 5 to 6 percent over 2007.
But since the economy crashed in September, is that even a reasonable assumption? I mean, you have the TV deals, and the season ticket sales were already wrapped up at that point, but the single game ticket sales and merchandise revenue had to drop a little bit from last year. Basically, I think that the cap projection of 123 mil that was made prior to the economic downturn probably affected gross league revenues, and I would be surprised if the cap pushed north of 119 mil. And if this can be construed as an excuse for getting rid of Casey Rabach, then count me in. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=GTripp0012;518434]Spot on. My only point is this: an increase in the Salary Cap by $7 million implys that defined gross revenues for the NFL increased by 5 to 6 percent over 2007.
But since the economy crashed in September, is that even a reasonable assumption? I mean, you have the TV deals, and the season ticket sales were already wrapped up at that point, but the single game ticket sales and merchandise revenue had to drop a little bit from last year. Basically, I think that the cap projection of 123 mil that was made prior to the economic downturn probably affected gross league revenues, and I would be surprised if the cap pushed north of 119 mil. And if this can be construed as an excuse for getting rid of Casey Rabach, then count me in.[/quote] LOL at the Rabach comment. You're absolutely right, the $123 million cap limit is a preliminary projection at this point. The NFL will publish the actual cap limit in the coming weeks. The economic downturn could indeed result in a lower number than previously expected. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=GTripp0012;518434]Spot on. My only point is this: an increase in the Salary Cap by $7 million implys that defined gross revenues for the NFL increased by 5 to 6 percent over 2007.
But since the economy crashed in September, is that even a reasonable assumption? I mean, you have the TV deals, and the season ticket sales were already wrapped up at that point, but the single game ticket sales and merchandise revenue had to drop a little bit from last year. Basically, I think that the cap projection of 123 mil that was made prior to the economic downturn probably affected gross league revenues, and I would be surprised if the cap pushed north of 119 mil. [B]And if this can be construed as an excuse for getting rid of Casey Rabach, then count me in.[/B][/quote] Who replaces him if we're too broke to meddle in FA? Jansen? |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Faced with the decision with signing DeAngelo Hall, or some other free agent who is actually good, I say: that I wish Hall wasn't a local boy.
But yeah, this actually shows why it's even more insane to worry about the contracts of Rogers and Campbell right now, when we have to decide right here and right now which direction the team is going to go in the future, and player movement figures to be restricted in the future. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=The Goat;518439]Who replaces him if we're too broke to meddle in FA? Jansen?[/quote]Well, yeah, the in house options are Jansen, Rinehart, or a draft choice. I think the money saved on Rabach could be reinvested in Jason Brown, who the Ravens appear to be willing to let walk.
Should have gotten Jeff Faine last year, and then we wouldn't be in this situation now. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;518437]LOL at the Rabach comment.
You're absolutely right, the $123 million cap limit is a preliminary projection at this point. The NFL will publish the actual cap limit in the coming weeks. The economic downturn could indeed result in a lower number than previously expected.[/quote] It's not expected to be radically different from the already projected $123 million, could actually be a bit higher at around $124 million. That's the last I've heard at least. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
I think the entire offseason plan can be summed up by one boolean dualism: EITHER the veterans OR younger free agents.
You have your Shawn Springs, but you also have Dunta Robinson out there. You have your Jason Taylor, but you also have Julius Peppers out there. You have your Phillip Daniels, but you also have Terrell Suggs out there. You have your Marcus Washington, but you also have Karlos Dansby out there. You have your Casey Rabach, but you also have Jason Brown out there. You have your DeAngelo Hall, but you also have Nnamdi Asomugha out there. And some tough choices will have to be made for sure. I have to say, the cut the older guys and go with the top free agents looks really nice on paper, but it's tough to say for sure which players are critical for our success in the future, and who we would just be overpaying. Which is why GMs get paid what they do. For the first time in memory, we wont be able to have our cake and eat it too. We have to choose our own veterans vs. the far risker, but potentially more rewarding FA route. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Something tells me we're going to be fairly aggressive in free agency. Not quite like some of the spending sprees we've seen in the past, but I could definitely see us signing 2-3 top guys.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Mattyk72;518449]Something tells me we're going to be fairly aggressive in free agency. Not quite like some of the spending sprees we've seen in the past, but I could definitely see us signing 2-3 top guys.[/quote]
I think that's certainly possible, but for that to happen we're either saying peace out DeAngelo Hall, or we're saying bye bye to Taylor and/or Springs. Or a CBA gets struck and we get everything we want! |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;518451]I think that's certainly possible, but for that to happen we're either saying peace out DeAngelo Hall, [B]or we're saying bye bye to Taylor and/or Springs.[/B]
Or a CBA gets struck and we get everything we want![/quote] Before all the enlightenment on salary cap status I voted yes to bringing Taylor back on a restructured deal ($4 mill/year or something). Less enthused about him now. I think it's safe to say JT is not the answer @ strong side end. Either Daniels returns to swap w/ Evans (who we ought to bring back) or Daniels is gone and we go get someone else. (Just curious what Peppers is likely to command for salary?) Anyway, Taylor seems like something of a luxury looking ahead being that AC is here to stay and probably as effective as Taylor in our defense at other end position. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;518432]That was the hard part of laying out this scenario, ultimately I don't know who the Skins will decide to part with.[B] It could be Washington, it could be Taylor, it could be Springs, it could be all three.[/B]
So it's hard to tell, I'm just going on my best guess. But if anything, this shows how tight things will be for the 'Skins if we don't get a new CBA. They'll be limited in free agency, and forced to make some tough roster decisions.[/quote] Schneed - I think it will be all 3 - why not clear as much space as we can now and make a run at bolstering the lines with young guys? Maybe 1 on the offensive line and one on the defensive line and than draft a couple of lineman and a linebacker. The more you look at the situation the more it seems likely the Skins should cut all 3 as the injuries and age are big time negatives as no other team in the leagus would pay them this type of money. I also say no to restructures on these 3 - lets stop mortgaging the future cap space and get some youth injected into the team. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;518451]I think that's certainly possible, but for that to happen we're either saying peace out DeAngelo Hall, or we're saying bye bye to Taylor and/or Springs.
Or a CBA gets struck and we get everything we want![/quote] It makes the most sense to junk Taylor and his $8M. Injuries aside Springs is still pretty valuable at corner and is versatile enough to play safety. I don't get the boner that some have over Hall, I'd rather keep Springs and Rogers and look at a free agent like Asomugha if the Raiders can't keep him. He won't come cheap but I think he would be worth it. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[IMG]http://wai.redskins.com/redskinsFile/players/images/26855.jpg[/IMG]
He is pretty handsome... |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Bill B;518461]Schneed - I think it will be all 3 - why not clear as much space as we can now and make a run at bolstering the lines with young guys? Maybe 1 on the offensive line and one on the defensive line and than draft a couple of lineman and a linebacker. The more you look at the situation the more it seems likely the Skins should cut all 3 as the injuries and age are big time negatives as no other team in the leagus would pay them this type of money. I also say no to restructures on these 3 - lets stop mortgaging the future cap space and get some youth injected into the team.[/quote]
I get the logic, and if I were running the show I'd probably go this route or something very similar to it. But Vinny's running it, and based on what I've heard and seen, he likes JT for more than a year, and the team still loves Springs. Maybe Vinny will surprise us and do the right thing by cutting Taylor. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Schneed, have you factored in signing in our current free agents? I mean my guess is Suisham is gone, Evans is likely to stay but I could see them letting him go, K. Campbell probably won't command much in the open market so he will probably stay, Kendall I'm just not sure about, Golston, Montgomery, and Doughty are all restricted free agents. Doughty is probably gone especially if they move Springs to Safety, I know they're not going to work hard to keep Golston, which leaves Montgomery
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=SmootSmack;518501]Schneed, have you factored in signing in our current free agents? I mean my guess is Suisham is gone, Evans is likely to stay but I could see them letting him go, K. Campbell probably won't command much in the open market so he will probably stay, Kendall I'm just not sure about, Golston, Montgomery, and Doughty are all restricted free agents. Doughty is probably gone especially if they move Springs to Safety, I know they're not going to work hard to keep Golston, which leaves Montgomery[/quote]
Yes. Once they clear cap space, I have them signing the following guys: DeAngelo Hall [COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana]($4.5)[/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Verdana]Pete Kendall[COLOR=red] ($1.5)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Anthony Montgomery[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Kedric Golston[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Demetric Evans[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Reed Doughty[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Kicker [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Ethan Albright [COLOR=red]($0.83)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Rookies [COLOR=red]($3.5)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Players Removed from Top 51 $5.3[/FONT] [B][FONT=Verdana]Total Expected Signings [COLOR=red]($10.0)[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] Put a different way, I think they'll have $10 million in cap room to sign various players. One will need to be a kicker, one will need to be a long snapper, one will need to be a guard if they let Kendall go, they'll need D Linemen if they decide to let Monty, Golston and Evans walk. The one extravagant signing I have in here is Hall. If they decide to let him go they can use that money for somebody else. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=GTripp0012;518447]I think the entire offseason plan can be summed up by one boolean dualism: EITHER the veterans OR younger free agents.[/quote]
BOOLEAN DUALISM..........that is awesome...is that from Trekkie convention? |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
CBA no CBA. I guess I'm confused even after all the banter about it. I thought if the CBA was going by the way side then we would have only one year, 2010 to worry about. Then in 2011 all teams could spend as much money as they liked due to no CBA anymore. It was my understanding that if we could make it past the 2010 year we would be good.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=SBXVII;518565]CBA no CBA. I guess I'm confused even after all the banter about it. I thought if the CBA was going by the way side then we would have only one year, 2010 to worry about. Then in 2011 all teams could spend as much money as they liked due to no CBA anymore. It was my understanding that if we could make it past the 2010 year we would be good.[/quote]
You've got the concept right, you're just off by a year. The CBA is set to expire in 2010, which would mean 2010 would have no salary cap at all and we'd be free to have as much salary on the books as we wanted. But that means 2009 becomes the Final Capped Season, and as such specific rules governing contracts and cap allocation methodology are in effect. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Great thread Schneed. My sheets are ok but it's your analysis that really gives them value. Thanks for all the hard work.
My personal view is that: - Taylor is gone or severly restructured (minimum salary and a very small signing bonus and/or incentives) - Potential cuts: Washington, Griffin, Rabach, Daniels are all cut candidates. Doubt all would go but if the Skins do commit to some kind of youth movement (stop laughing) they are all candidates. - Springs - the guy breaks my heart. One of the best corners in the NFL but he just doesn't play enough. I gave him a pass last year on some of the lesser games (Det, etc.) but he's gotta be in that 2nd Dallas game. He is definitely looking for one more significant deal which may explain his propensity for sitting out games. One bad injury and he would never play again. It seems like he plays just enough to show other teams he can still play but not enough to risk injury. Maybe if we give him a decent deal he will finish his career here and actually play all the games, but it doesn't seem likely. The right move for the future might just be to let him go... |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Also I think Jansen will stay but he would have been a perfect June 1 cut.
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Thanks for all the cap info. Does anyone know if the players we draft in April effect our cap number for next year ?
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=redskin37;518649]Thanks for all the cap info. Does anyone know if the players we draft in April effect our cap number for next year ?[/quote]
Yes. If you look at the "Cap Summary" sheet there is a line at the bottom called "Rookie Pool". From: [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/salary-cap-central/22635-the-warpath-presents-salary-cap-101-a.html[/url] "What is the Rookie Pool? - The rookie pool is the max cap space a team can spend on signing draft picks and undrafted free agents. A team's rookie pool is based on the number and position of draft picks, with teams holding higher picks being allocated more dollars per pick than teams holding lower picks. The rookie pool counts against the salary cap until the players are signed or released." |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Great analysis of the Salary Cap.
Personally I, think that we should definetly cut Griffin, Washington, and Daniels. They are dinosaurs on our team who either can't stay healty or don't produce. Washington and Daniels have not played a full season in about 3 years, and as far as Griffin goes, I just think that position needs a serious up grade. I would try to restructure Taylor and Springs, but if one has to go it would be Springs. I just have a feeling that Taylor will play with a chip on his shoulder next season, you could see how disappointed he was at him self at the end of the year. Sign Hall and re-sign Rogers to a long term contract. Youth in the backfield. Address the other areas of the team via the draft and free agency. For Goodness sakes get a CAPABLE KICKER!!!!!!!!!!! |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;518504]Yes. Once they clear cap space, I have them signing the following guys:
DeAngelo Hall [COLOR=red][FONT=Verdana]($4.5)[/FONT][/COLOR] [FONT=Verdana]Pete Kendall[COLOR=red] ($1.5)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Anthony Montgomery[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Kedric Golston[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Demetric Evans[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Reed Doughty[COLOR=red] ($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Kicker [COLOR=red]($1.0)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Ethan Albright [COLOR=red]($0.83)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Rookies [COLOR=red]($3.5)[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Players Removed from Top 51 $5.3[/FONT] [B][FONT=Verdana]Total Expected Signings [COLOR=red]($10.0)[/COLOR][/FONT][/B] Put a different way, I think they'll have $10 million in cap room to sign various players. One will need to be a kicker, one will need to be a long snapper, one will need to be a guard if they let Kendall go, they'll need D Linemen if they decide to let Monty, Golston and Evans walk. The one extravagant signing I have in here is Hall. If they decide to let him go they can use that money for somebody else.[/quote] Thanks, let me ask you this from a cap standpoint are Carlos Rogers and Santana Moss legitimately tradeable? |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Thanks for this thread Schneed. I must admist that I haven't been very knowledgable about the salary cap and how it effects the roster. This thread has helped me considerably with everyone's questions.
I'll not post on this again because I prefer to read. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=SmootSmack;519364]Thanks, let me ask you this from a cap standpoint are Carlos Rogers and Santana Moss legitimately tradeable?[/quote]
I would say if the 'Skins really really wanted to get it done, yes they are both tradeable. But doing so would come at a cost. Moss is easier to move than Rogers. Trading Moss would cost us half a million in cap space. My math in the first post is showing that filling the roster without cutting all three of Springs, Washington, and Taylor is very tight. But to move Moss, you basically need to find another $500K in space somewhere else. You could forego a DeAngelo Hall resigning, you could find a player who will take a paycut, you could get rid of an extra player like Phillip Daniels, or you could decide to let Jason Taylor (or Springs) go along with Marcus Washington. So the short answer is yes, Moss is very tradeable, IF you can get comfortable with the opportunity cost. With Rogers, the opportunity cost is greater. Sending him away in a trade would cost us $1.5 million in cap space. That of course means finding even more room than you would need for Moss. Is it doable? Absolutely. But again, it means getting rid of veterans who you'd otherwise keep, foregoing DeAngelo Hall or Pete Kendall, or finding someone to take a paycut. In my opinion, trading either one would make the team worse, because the opportunity cost of doing so outweighs the value they'd bring back in a trade. But if Vinny and company disagreed with me on that point, they could get it done. |
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
[quote=Schneed10;519385]I would say if the 'Skins really really wanted to get it done, yes they are both tradeable. But doing so would come at a cost.
Moss is easier to move than Rogers. Trading Moss would cost us half a million in cap space. My math in the first post is showing that filling the roster without cutting all three of Springs, Washington, and Taylor is very tight. But to move Moss, you basically need to find another $500K in space somewhere else. You could forego a DeAngelo Hall resigning, you could find a player who will take a paycut, you could get rid of an extra player like Phillip Daniels, or you could decide to let Jason Taylor (or Springs) go along with Marcus Washington. So the short answer is yes, Moss is very tradeable, IF you can get comfortable with the opportunity cost. With Rogers, the opportunity cost is greater. Sending him away in a trade would cost us $1.5 million in cap space. That of course means finding even more room than you would need for Moss. Is it doable? Absolutely. But again, it means getting rid of veterans who you'd otherwise keep, foregoing DeAngelo Hall or Pete Kendall, or finding someone to take a paycut. In my opinion, trading either one would make the team worse, because the opportunity cost of doing so outweighs the value they'd bring back in a trade. But if Vinny and company disagreed with me on that point, they could get it done.[/quote] Thanks. I bring the rumors, you bring the data :) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.