![]() |
Sellers believes he's due for raise
[url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/05/sellers-believes-hes-due-for-raise/]Sellers believes he's due for raise - Washington Times[/url]
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Caveman is and always has been one of my favorite players. He's a beast, and is definitely worth more than the $900K we're paying him.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
So do I....... believe I'm due for a raise A BIG ONE! I'm a BIG MIKE fan but, your under contract, get to work!
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=GMScud;572797]Caveman is and always has been one of my favorite players. He's a beast, and is definitely worth more than the $900K we're paying him.[/quote]
Perhaps, but he's also 34 (35?) and it wouldn't hurt us to start looking for his replacement. I think we should be doing the same for Portis/Betts as well (but that's another story) |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
2 years left on his contract. i would extend him for another year. That gives us ample time to groom a backup.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Not sure how much you want to throw at a 34 year old FB, but they should look to throw him some sort of bone.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=SmootSmack;572802]Perhaps, but he's also 34 (35?) and it wouldn't hurt us to start looking for his replacement. I think we should be doing the same for Portis/Betts as well (but that's another story)[/quote]
There is no age limit for pounding on people...just on pounding the rock. He is still a very good Fullback. Besides the last couple of Fullbacks that we drafted, didn't really pan out. Perhaps we should just find some young undrafted kid to do the job when MS can't do it anymore. Or we can just move Yoder to FB. He is only 31. :laughing- |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Lorenzo Neal is old as hell and he's still putting in work.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=SmootSmack;572802]Perhaps, but he's also 34 (35?) and it wouldn't hurt us to [B]start looking for his replacement[/B]. I think we should be doing the same for Portis/Betts as well (but that's another story)[/quote]
What about Eddie Williams. Hopefully that will be his replacement. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Give him something more. He's worth it.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Im a huge fan. I am so glad he made the pro bowl, and he could have gone there the last few years IMO. Throw him a bone.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
They definitely should give him something, if for no other reason than it likely builds morale when you reward players who outperform their deals and don't hold out.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Mattyk72;572806]Not sure how much you want to throw at a 34 year old FB, but they should look to throw him some sort of bone.[/quote]
I agree. He's a longtime Redskin and a core guy. More than that he's a beast out there. He's a vocal leader and he's a team guy. Let's not break the bank but i think an extension would be well deserved. I see both sides to it. On one side you might say, you've signed a contract so play it out. On the other side you might say that these contracts aren't guaranteed and Mike Sellers has outplayed his contract. I can see it from the eyes of the player too. You've got a limited amount of time to make your money...so make it. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
I think we should base his contract on how high he can jump.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=firstdown;572821]I think we should base his contract on how high he can jump.[/quote]
or how many one arm push-ups he can do. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=redsk1;572818]I agree. He's a longtime Redskin and a core guy. More than that he's a beast out there. He's a vocal leader and he's a team guy. Let's not break the bank but i think an extension would be well deserved.
I see both sides to it. On one side you might say, you've signed a contract so play it out. On the other side you might say that these contracts aren't guaranteed and Mike Sellers has outplayed his contract. I can see it from the eyes of the player too. You've got a limited amount of time to make your money...so make it.[/quote] He did leave us, get in trouble, then we gave him a second chance. I like him but if 900k a year is not good enough then too bad. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Give him a cool mill I say.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
900000 and jason taylor played how many games and got how many mill(he was hurt but almost ten times as much come on)? doesnt add up
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Man's got a point. I think he should get a little more cash given how well he has played for us the past four years.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=47FAN;572835]900000 and jason taylor played how many games and got how many mill(he was hurt but almost ten times as much come on)? doesnt add up[/quote]
I think you are kinda comparing apples to oranges there. I like Sellers a lot, but for some reason the image of him fumbling at the 1-yd line in that game against Cincinnati keeps popping in my mind. I know it's unfair to say that, but that was just a terrible moment for the Skins last year. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Ruhskins;572838]I think you are kinda comparing apples to oranges there. I like Sellers a lot, but for some reason the image of him fumbling at the 1-yd line in that game against Cincinnati keeps popping in my mind. I know it's unfair to say that, but [B]that was just a terrible moment for the Skins last year[/B].[/quote]
There were plenty of bad moments for the Skins last year and it wasn't just Sellers making them. What would we look like without him? [B]Give him some money![/B] |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=53Fan;572839]There were plenty of bad moments for the Skins last year and it wasn't just Sellers making them. What would we look like without him? [B]Give him some money![/B][/quote]
I'm not disagreeing (and like I said, it was unfair for me to bring this up), but I just remember going insane when it happened. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Ruhskins;572841]I'm not disagreeing (and like I said, it was unfair for me to bring this up), but[B] I just remember going insane when it happened[/B].[/quote]
Well I did too Ruh, but I thought the ball crossed the goaline or at least the whistle should have been blown. Anyway, he makes Portis and the rest of this offense better and he's worth more than he's making compared to some of the other FB's. I'm not trying to make a big deal out of it, but with all the players in the league whose effort is less than stellar, I think Mike deserves this and I think we're better when he's on the field. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
On a personal level, it's only fair to give him what he deserves: within the top 5 of fullback salaries.
On a business level, it can be justified and leveraged by 2 major things- his recent past production/performance consistently for years and potential to continue to produce. Lorenzo Neal is 38 years old. Mike Sellers is 34. I think it's comparible to use Neal's age, durability, and longevity in football to predict Sellers's. At least 4 more years for Sellers at this level may be likely. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
And 2 seasons from now, when his contract is up- I would not want to see him in a giants uniform blocking for Brandon Jacobs. Could you or would you want to imagine that? That's what you would call a power run game.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=warriorzpath;572844]On a personal level, it's only fair to give him what he deserves: within the top 5 of fullback salaries.
On a business level, it can be justified and leveraged by 2 major things- his recent past production/performance consistently for years and potential to continue to produce. Lorenzo Neal is 38 years old. Mike Sellers is 34. I think it's comparible to use Neal's age, durability, and longevity in football to predict Sellers's. At least 4 more years for Sellers at this level may be likely.[/quote] Well said. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
The Caveman is a monster. I really would not want to sit across from him and tell him that he didn't deserve a raise. He might hurdle the table and administer one of the patented "Curl up in the fetal position like Zach Thomas" hits.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Unfortunately for Sellers, contracts are based on the future -- not the past. From a business perspective, it really just doesn't make sense. Sorry Mike.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
When the guy doesn't fumble on the 1 and decides to not half-ass warm-ups, then we can talk. He's under contract and not in his final year, STFU and play.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;572851]When the guy doesn't fumble on the 1 and decides to not half-ass warm-ups, then we can talk. He's under contract and not in his final year, STFU and play.[/quote]
Did you mention that to him at TC today ;) Seriously though, all the quotes look like a lot of good stuff today, did you have a good time there? Same question to you Daseal! |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;572851]When the guy doesn't fumble on the 1 and decides to not half-ass warm-ups, then we can talk. He's under contract and not in his final year, STFU and play.[/quote]
I am sure that will go over well with him. Especially since that is how they treat Portis and every free agent who gets flown in on a private jet. Look at Randle-El. He contributes one trick play a year to the team and gets paid #2 or #1 WR money. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
I've never seen a pro-bowl player who's as much a team player as Mike Sellers is catch so much s**t from his own teams fans. I'd ask for the money too. It's not like he's holding out. Even Stump Mitchell sees him playing a few more years. Why not renegotiate his contract? We've renegotiated lots of others. I could see him playing 4 or 5 more years.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
I think he deserves it, but now is not the time to be dealing with that. Unlike the JC media comments, I do think this is a time to tell your agent what you want, and go out and bust your ass to prove it.
after the season I hope he gets a good bump or extension. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=CRedskinsRule;572864]I think he deserves it, [B]but now is not the time to be dealing with that[/B]. Unlike the JC media comments, I do think this is a time to tell your agent what you want, and go out and bust your ass to prove it.
after the season I hope he gets a good bump or extension.[/quote] True. I agree. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
I think it's a smart move by the FO. No matter what happens this year it's not like next year if he becomes a free agent teams will be going hard after a 35 year old fullback. I think he deserves more money, but I don't know if anybody is willing to give it to him.
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Guys, it's nice to think "He played hard, give him more money." Are you the same fans that bitch about our lack of cap space? The FO inability to make shrewd moves? If you thought paying an over the hill free agent is bad, why would you pay an over the hill player under contract.
I'd love to say "Sure, give him more money, he's played hard!" but lets face it, it is a bad business move. Save the money, let Sellers walk IN TWO YEARS, and thank him for his service. Don't throw precious cap space away on a 35 year old fullback. I realize NFL players have short careers and they sacrifice their bodies for the game -- but the man is due 900,000, he's not starving. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Daseal;572881]Guys, it's nice to think "He played hard, give him more money." Are you the same fans that bitch about our lack of cap space? The FO inability to make shrewd moves? If you thought paying an over the hill free agent is bad, why would you pay an over the hill player under contract.
I'd love to say "Sure, give him more money, he's played hard!" but lets face it, it is a bad business move. Save the money, let Sellers walk IN TWO YEARS, and thank him for his service. Don't throw precious cap space away on a 35 year old fullback. I realize NFL players have short careers and they sacrifice their bodies for the game -- but the man is due 900,000, he's not starving.[/quote] Crystalized my thoughts eloquently. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;572854]I am sure that will go over well with him. Especially since that is how they treat Portis and every free agent who gets flown in on a private jet.
Look at Randle-El. He contributes one trick play a year to the team and gets paid #2 or #1 WR money.[/quote]I don't write the checks, but if I did ARE probably wouldn't be here and if he was it would be for a lot less. If you look at Portis' contract structure his days may be numbered after this year also. |
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
yeah, but pay him next year, you know there won't be a cap ;)
|
Re: Sellers believes he's due for raise
Seller's brought up a great point the other day, when he said he gets paid less than most of the FB's in the league, most of them who haven't even made a pro bowl. He's one of the top 2 best fullbacks in the league, hands down.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.