Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

I know we all will find out in a few hours, but who do you think will spend tomorrow, and also your thoughts on the season, on the inactive list. With everyone healthy it seems like a pretty hard call to me, but I suppose my list would include:
RB Mason
OT MW
CB Westbrook

wow, I really can't think of 5 other players to add.

Also I would love for someone to explain the logic of a 45 man gameday roster. It seems like the 8 practice squad should just be your teams 8, and still have 53 active on game day.

Thoughts?

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Jerry Jones and Brett Favre should be inactive.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

^^LOL

not to hijack my own thread, but Favre's new commercial for Sears makes him look like a grade A Jackass. I mean I think it is a funny commercial, but I think he comes off looking idiotic.

back to the thread, I suppose a DL needs to be inactive also. Carlos better not be inactive with his calf or I will be ticked off.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Batiste
Michael Williams
Anthony Montgomery
Marcus Mason
Todd Yoder
Renaldo Wynn
Byron Westbrook
Edwin Williams

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;587270][B]Batiste[/B]
[B]Michael Williams[/B]
Anthony Montgomery
Marcus Mason
Todd Yoder
Renaldo Wynn
Byron Westbrook
Edwin Williams[/quote]

So who backs up the OT spot?

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

More seriously:
Mason
Mike Williams
Ed Williams
Mitchell
Wynn
Westbrook
Henson
Jarmon

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Wynn

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

I don't WANT Mitchell or Jarmon on the inactive list but being the first game they probably will be. I think it would look something like this.

1-Henson
2-Mason
3-Westbrook
4-E. Williams
5-Batiste
6-Mitchell
7-W. Montgomery
8-Jarmon

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;587271]So who backs up the OT spot?[/quote]

Rinehart

Montgomery

Lorenzo Alexander

Ethan Albright

Are the backup OL, I suppose Henson could be inactive and MW active.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Mason
B. Westbrook
K. Barnes
M. Williams
Edwin Williams
Henson

The next two are tough:

M Mitchell (unfortunately)
A Montgomery

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Welcome to the board AZ Skins Girl!

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Thank you! Long time lurker.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=AZ Skins Girl;587284]Thank you! Long time lurker.[/quote]

You've picked a good time to join, should be an exciting season!

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Wow its a tough choice to pick who not to dress but if I had to based the team like the G-Men than my picks would be the following.
1.B.Westbrook
2.Edwin Williams
3.Batiste
4.Mitchell
5.Mason
6.Wynn
7.Robert Thomas ( Henson better special teams)
8.? Barnes ( only if Rogers in fully recovered)

Man this is a difficult thing to decide when all your players are helthy.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Wynn inactive?! [U]Wynn[/U]???!!!

If Wynn is inactive then there was absolutely no reason to keep him on the roster. We didn't need an over-the-hill DE who isn't even good enough to be active on game day. We could still have Dixon instead and Dixon could be inactive while he is developing as a player.

If Wynn is inactive then we are carrying a boat anchor while our rival is developing a promising young player we could have had.

That was a terrible roster decision.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=skins89moss;587292]Wow its a tough choice to pick who not to dress but if I had to based the team like the G-Men than my picks would be the following.
1.B.Westbrook
2.Edwin Williams
3.Batiste
4.Mitchell
5.Mason
6.Wynn
7.Robert Thomas ( Henson better special teams)
8.? Barnes ( only if Rogers in fully recovered)

Man this is a difficult thing to decide when all your players are helthy.[/quote]

Robert Thomas was cut. :)

Ill go with:
Westbrook
M.Williams
E.Williams
Batiste
Mason
Mitchell
Henson
Jarmon

Id love to see both Mitchell/Jarmon, but I dont see who you bump.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.

As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting.

No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;587327]I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.

As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting.

No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?[/quote]

I would be glad to tell you...if I knew. It makes zero sense to me. I also would like to see the roster expanded to 58 instead of 53.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;587327][B]I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. [/B] Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.

As to Jarmon and Mitchell, I think they want to keep Mitchell active, but like I said the 45 man roster is somewhat limiting.

No one has yet taken a shot at explaining why the 8 man difference between roster, and active. All 53 get game checks don't they? So can anyone tell me what the CBA logic was to limiting the roster to 45?[/quote]

Big Mike is still a little hobbled. That is why he might be inactive.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=AZ Skins Girl;587284]Thank you! Long time lurker.[/quote]

Lurking happens. Welcome to the active roster.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[B]From Jason Reid:[/B]


Expect to See Rogers Start, [B]Jarmon on Active List[/B]

Just got a text from a source who had a few interesting tidbits about the Redskins' plans for the team's active roster against the Giants.

First, the most important news: cornerback Carlos Rogers will start, according to the source. Although everyone was saying late in the week that Rogers had fully recovered from the lingering calf injury that sidelined him for much of the preseason, the reality is that sometimes recoveries regress. But I was told to expect to see Rogers in the opening lineup.

[B]Also, defensive tackle [B]Anthony Montgomery[/B] is not expected to be active[/B]. With the arrival of defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth, Montgomery has been pushed down the depth chart.

Barring last-minute changes, there figures to be one surprising development with the inactive list:[B] Rookie defensive end Jeremy Jarmon is expected to be active instead of veteran end [B]Renaldo Wynn.[/B][/B]

When I received the text about the roster, the first thing I thought was that my source must be wrong about this one. I mean, I know Vinny Cerrato, Washington's executive vice president of football operations, and coaches are excited about Jarmon's potential, but the Redskins have said they would take it slowly with the kid. And then he's active in Week 1 against an NFC East rival on the road?

Also, the Redskins brought back Wynn, I was told, to provide veteran leadership in the locker room and depth at both end positions on game days. Jarmon does not play both sides. And the main reason for having Wynn active, I would think, is because he played for the Giants last season.

Wouldn't the potential of having someone on the field, albeit briefly, with his experience and knowledge only benefit the team? But as soon as my source told me where he got the information, I was convinced.

Of course, anything could change between now and when the list must be submitted before kickoff. But based on what the source told me, this is what I'm expecting.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

I would like to see Jarmon in on passing downs...he can bring some pressure. We could have rookie DE's in at the same time on some plays. Jarmon-Orakpo....bringing the pressure...sacking Eli. :)

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Finally Zorn sees the light and places Wynn on the bench

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;587327]I think an interesting choice is going to be Batiste/M. Williams, at least one of them needs to be active in case a Tackle goes down. Whichever one is kept active will say alot about the coaches opinion of the other.[/quote]

I was thinking Rinehart would backup if we had someone go down. I know they like him more at guard, but hopefully we dont have to find out. :)

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Renaldo Wynn
Byron Westbrook
Mike Williams
Edwin Williams
Todd Yoder
Robert Henson
Kareem Moore
Marcus Mason

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

With our line facing the likes of Haynesworth, Griffin, Jarmon, Orakpo, and Golston in practice i would hope that they would be a little better in blocking for JC.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Jarmon sure is a nice surprise. So much for bringing him along slowly. I guess he's an example of someone simply forcing the coaches to play him.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[quote=WaldSkins;587349]Finally Zorn sees the light and places Wynn on the bench[/quote]

He should have been cut.

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

Comcast just said Rinehart would be inactive. ???

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

According to Matt Terl, todays inactive list:

Mason
Barnes
E. Williams
Henson
Rinehart
Batiste
A. Montgomery
Wynn

Re: Who would you keep as inactive tomorrow
 

[URL="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/jason-reid/redskins-inactives-2.html"]From the Wash. Post[/URL]:
Redskins' Inactives

The following players are inactive for the Redskins: Marcus Mason, Kevin Barnes, Edwin Williams, Robert Henson, Chad Rinehart, D'Anthony Batiste, Anthony Montgomery, and Renaldo Wynn