Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Parking Lot (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Voters IQ (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=3583)

redrock-skins 11-05-2004 10:22 PM

Voters IQ
 
The site speaks for itself:


[url]http://attenuation.net/files/iq.htm[/url]

Redskins8588 11-05-2004 10:26 PM

Thats pretty funny, and it explains alot!!!

JoeRedskin 11-06-2004 03:37 AM

Interesting but as with most statistics not quite what it seems to be. Follow some of the links suggested:

[url]http://www.isteve.com/Web_Exclusives_Archive-May2004.htm#38115.6465670139[/url]

The post polling data I saw indicated that (similar to 2000) those with most education (post graduate degrees) and the least (no high school diploma) went Kerry and everyone in between went Bush.

Sammy Baugh Fan 11-06-2004 07:53 AM

Well, if you want to continue to insult fellow Americans because you picked a loser then I guess you have the right. The real fool was Democratic Party for misjudging FIFTY EIGHT MILLION FELLOW AMERICANS and thinkin they were going to be vote for an elitist yankee flip flopper.

All I have to say to democrats is "Enjoy your hate" but you need to get over it.

I actually felt sorry for you liberals who thought KERRY was the best shot you had at getting into the WHite House. What were you thinking?

My I predict the Democrats won't see the inside of the White House for at least the rest of this decade and beyond.

Have agreat day friends and go Redskins!
peace

NY_Skinsfan 11-06-2004 08:44 AM

[QUOTE=Sammy Baugh Fan]Well, if you want to continue to insult fellow Americans because you picked a loser then I guess you have the right. The real fool was Democratic Party for misjudging FIFTY EIGHT MILLION FELLOW AMERICANS and thinkin they were going to be vote for an elitist yankee flip flopper.

All I have to say to democrats is "Enjoy your hate" but you need to get over it.

I actually felt sorry for you liberals who thought KERRY was the best shot you had at getting into the WHite House. What were you thinking?

My I predict the Democrats won't see the inside of the White House for at least the rest of this decade and beyond.

Have agreat day friends and go Redskins!
peace[/QUOTE]

You should change your name from Sammy Baugh Fan to Democrat Hater...sheesh.

Sammy Baugh Fan 11-06-2004 08:54 AM

[QUOTE=NY_Skinsfan]You should change your name from Sammy Baugh Fan to Democrat Hater...sheesh.[/QUOTE]

No, this is my first post since the elections. I could have got in here and gloated about Bush winning but I didn't even respond until a BUSH HATER had to insult 58,000,000+ Americans that voted for Bush.

I commented on the Liberals who continue their hate.

Have a nice day fellow Redskin Fan.

peace
mike

illdefined 11-06-2004 09:11 AM

[QUOTE=Sammy Baugh Fan]Well, if you want to continue to insult fellow Americans because you picked a loser then I guess you have the right. The real fool was Democratic Party for misjudging FIFTY EIGHT MILLION FELLOW AMERICANS and thinkin they were going to be vote for an elitist yankee flip flopper.[/QUOTE]

did you just say 'Yankee'? damn. well thats a pleasant anachronism. when you say 'enjoy your hate' SBF, is it because you enjoy yours so much?

Sammy Baugh Fan 11-06-2004 09:36 AM

[QUOTE=illdefined]did you just say 'Yankee'? damn. well thats a pleasant anachronism. when you say 'enjoy your hate' SBF, is it because you enjoy yours so much?[/QUOTE]

lol
This coming from a "Anybody but Bush" person.

peace

illdefined 11-06-2004 09:42 AM

[QUOTE=Sammy Baugh Fan]lol
This coming from a "Anybody but Bush" person.[/QUOTE]

that's not hate, it's fear. no planes or bombs will be exploding in the states that voted for Bush. but you didn't answer my question.

Daseal 11-06-2004 10:10 AM

SammyBaugh: Bush had his share of flip-flops. Like when he said he wasn't against gay marriage, it's just part of his platform. Other places he says that it's only for men and women! Which one is it!

SBF: I'm going to continue my hate, especially when I get drafted to fight a war I don't believe in.

Osama killed 3,000 innocent Americans. The United States has killed ten of thousands innocent Iraqi's. Iraqi wasn't even part of Al-Quada. They had no connections. We wonder why they're livid about their 'freedom.' Look at all the whining and complaining we went through when the World Trade center got hit with 3K dead. They have way more and we think they should be grateful to us? We've bombed wedding parties and just the other day an F-16 bombed an elementary school. Great going Bush!

MTK 11-06-2004 10:35 AM

All Politicians are guilty of "flip-flopping" on issues.

I have to hand it to Bush's campaign, they really did a great job at painting Kerry as a flip-flopper and a Massachusetts Liberal. They also did a great job at getting out the vote.

SBF, you want to criticize Democrats for our supposed hate, but your words ironically sound a bit hateful and degrading. And I wouldn't call it hate that the democrats have, passion is probably more appropriate.

That Guy 11-06-2004 11:44 AM

daseal, clinton cause the military to kill innocent civillians too... war sucks, your point?

and kerry wanted to greatly expand the number of people in the military, so "I was afraid of beingdrafted by kerry" :P

if it happens, i'll eat massive crow, until then we can match cynicisms all you want, but it won't change anything ;)

redrock-skins 11-06-2004 11:54 AM

"Bush hater" and proud of it! Its over, your side won and congrats. I'll get over it about as fast as republicans got over Clinton's re-election. Oh yeah, I forgot they never did and did everything they could while spent millions trying to remove him.

illdefined 11-06-2004 11:59 AM

War does suck. but war for war's sake is CRIME.

all ANY Bush supporter has to tell me is:

as dispicable as sadam was, How Was He A Threat To The United States???
even if he DID have those weapons and the intent (he had neither), HOW was he gonna use them on the United States? especially under the eye of UN and the world?

redrock-skins 11-06-2004 12:02 PM

[QUOTE=illdefined]War does suck. but war for war's sake is CRIME.

all ANY Bush supporter has to tell me is:

as dispicable as sadam was, How Was He A Threat To The United States???
even if he DID have those weapons and the intent (he had neither), HOW was he gonna use them on the United States? especially under the eye of UN and the world?[/QUOTE]

That questioned cannot be answered, because we're too busy worrying about gay marriage right now.

MTK 11-06-2004 12:53 PM

Bush supporters will never be convinced that going into Iraq was the wrong move.

We went in because of the supposed real threat of weapons of mass destruction. Bush managed to convinced the entire country that Sadam was a very real threat to our national security. Turns out Sadam had nothing, so where was this threat? Oh that's right, it didn't exist.

No problem for Bush and his backers though, they just changed gears from our primary purpose was to disarm him, to the world is a better place with him not in power. That's fine, but where were these weapons? Why can't Bush just admit they went to war with flawed information. Our soliders are being killed because we went to war on false pretenses.

Seems like a wasted effort to alot of people, but Bush and his supporters will blindly trudge through wasting thousands of lives in the process, all in the name of protecting us from WOMD, ooops, I forgot, there wasn't any. So why are we over there again? Because we care so much about spreading peace and democracy? Please, that's a joke and an insult to any person with a brain.

Bush never seems to have solid answers as to how he plans on bringing this to a conclusion, he just keeps saying we have to push forward. So what's the exit strategy? Is there one? How is this going to end? Or is it just going to be an endless cycle of violence and retaliations?

I sure as hell wouldn't put my life on the line for this administration if I was called on and I'm sure there are thousands upon thousands of people who feel the same way. I can only imagine the national revolt if a draft was put in place.

illdefined 11-06-2004 07:00 PM

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Bush supporters will never be convinced that going into Iraq was the wrong move.

We went in because of the supposed real threat of weapons of mass destruction. Bush managed to convinced the entire country that Sadam was a very real threat to our national security. Turns out Sadam had nothing, so where was this threat? Oh that's right, it didn't exist.
[/QUOTE]

my point is, even if they did exist, how did Bush think he was going to use them against us?? send some Super SCUD over? and not expect the world to come down on him?

how was he a threat to us even IF bush was right about the weapons?? anyone?

redrock-skins 11-06-2004 07:13 PM

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]
I sure as hell wouldn't put my life on the line for this administration if I was called on and I'm sure there are thousands upon thousands of people who feel the same way. I can only imagine the national revolt if a draft was put in place.[/QUOTE]

You shouldn't have to go if your drafted. Just follow your leaders, who either never showed up for duty or took deferments.

That Guy 11-07-2004 01:29 AM

if he had WoMD, there's a thing called a dirty bomb... you get a nuke in a backpack and explode it... no need for missiles. And he did at one point have WoMD, and he had actually used them (on his own people), and he had started wars of aggression with neighboring countries, 4th largest military airforce in the world, and he had tried to assassinate a US president. He was clearly a threat... big enough to go to war over? not so sure, but i find it hard for people to sit there and act like he was innocent or that he didn't have malicious desires...

The watchful eye of the UN was saying no publicly and selling him military equipment under the table (russian generals as consultants, russian gear including radar jammers, parts for french mirage jet fighters, among many other things)... the UN as a governing body truly sucks, cause it has no real power and each member is sent to represent countries that definately place their own agendas far in front of those that are best for the entire globe (in other words, its corrupt and without substantial oversight).

illdefined 11-07-2004 10:06 AM

[QUOTE=That Guy]if he had WoMD, there's a thing called a dirty bomb... you get a nuke in a backpack and explode it... no need for missiles. And he did at one point have WoMD, and he had actually used them (on his own people), and he had started wars of aggression with neighboring countries, 4th largest military airforce in the world, and he had tried to assassinate a US president. He was clearly a threat... big enough to go to war over? not so sure, but i find it hard for people to sit there and act like he was innocent or that he didn't have malicious desires...[/QUOTE]

lets say, he did have WMD (he didn't), lets say he did have the intent (he didnt, aside from in his dreams, besides with what? even the nuke plans were dusty), think all our allies would'nt have come down on him if he attacked the United States?? (yeah, we used to have allies..) we are FAR from a neighboring country, we are even LESS his own people. did you see how long it took our tiny part of the #1 army in the world to bitch aside the #4 army in the world (where the difference between 1st and 2nd is a tripling)?

why is it hard to believe he was a threat? cuz he wasn't. and thats been proven now. binladen was. bush had a hard-on for sadam and got him, no matter what the cost. he spent a FRACTION of what he spent in iraq in money and troops in afghanistan, and binladen is healthy, out of the caves and mocking us. thats INCOMPETENCE on massive scale.

[QUOTE=That Guy]The watchful eye of the UN was saying no publicly and selling him military equipment under the table (russian generals as consultants, russian gear including radar jammers, parts for french mirage jet fighters, among many other things)... the UN as a governing body truly sucks, cause it has no real power and each member is sent to represent countries that definately place their own agendas far in front of those that are best for the entire globe (in other words, its corrupt and without substantial oversight).[/QUOTE]

well, the US made sure the UN stays irrelevant by dismissing it and acting unilaterally. talk about pushing an agenda thats only good for one country (and it sure wasn't 'self-defense'). those 'russians' sure armed him pretty well, looks like it may have set us behind a week in turning his whole country to shit. the UN and more importantly our allies near and wide, kept sadam in check (he DIDNT have anything! why?) and the UN did a MUCH better job in assesing sadam's threat level than our 'intelligence', but bush made sure to attack before they could come to the right conclusion. yeah. fishy. and now, we're the global AGGRESSOR, the most hated country in the world (aside from maybe n.korea) and have alienated most of our allies...

bet you guys feel safe out there in bush country. the next time i smell burning hair and flesh in the air for three weeks straight, hope it's not my own.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.83014 seconds with 9 queries