Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=36834)

SmootSmack 06-02-2010 04:37 PM

Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/ross_tucker/06/02/greg.cosell/index.html]Tim Tebow, Donovan McNabb, Kevin Kolb on NFL coaches' tape - Ross Tucker - SI.com[/url]

tryfuhl 06-02-2010 05:36 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
was reading an article earlier about mcnabb not looking so hot at the previous OTA (might've been from the article that matty posted) .. I mean I won't pretend he's Manning level, but I'd like a little more confidence in abilities and not just leadership, bout to read this though

MTK 06-02-2010 05:56 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
I wouldn't take much from someone saying he didn't look sharp in an OTA. Isn't this what these are for? To install the systems and to begin to shake off the rust of the offseason?

tryfuhl 06-02-2010 06:01 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=Mattyk;704532]I wouldn't take much from someone saying he didn't look sharp in an OTA. Isn't this what these are for? To install the systems and to begin to shake off the rust of the offseason?[/quote]
No doubt, like I said I won't sweat it now or anything. The only thing that matters is regular season really.

backrow 06-03-2010 08:58 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Season is toast! Time for Rexy or Pineapple! :)

Longtimefan 06-03-2010 09:24 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=tryfuhl;704522]was reading an article earlier about mcnabb not looking so hot at the previous OTA (might've been from the article that matty posted) .. I mean I won't pretend he's Manning level, but I'd like a little more confidence in abilities and not just leadership, bout to read this though[/quote]

This is all so different for McNabb, after having played in the same system his entire career. His ability to grasp the system, establish cohesion and confidence, will go a long way towards determining what type season we're going to have.

Remember, McNabb was not known as an offseason workout warrior unless he was rehabbing.

KI Skins Fan 06-03-2010 10:03 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
I liked this comment by Greg Cosell:

"I believe where McNabb went, working under Mike Shanahan, will be an excellent fit. Shanahan is as good as there is when it comes to personnel packages, different formations and dictating matchups in the passing game that allow the QB to be very quick with his decision making."

Sweet.

Mechanix544 06-03-2010 10:10 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=KI Skins Fan;704643]I liked this comment by Greg Cosell:

"I believe where McNabb went, working under Mike Shanahan, will be an excellent fit. Shanahan is as good as there is when it comes to personnel packages, different formations and dictating matchups in the passing game that allow the QB to be very quick with his decision making."

Sweet.[/quote]

Ya, i agree we all like to hear that....

Longtimefan 06-03-2010 11:10 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=KI Skins Fan;704643]I liked this comment by Greg Cosell:

"I believe where McNabb went, working under Mike Shanahan, will be an excellent fit. Shanahan is as good as there is when it comes to personnel packages, different formations and dictating matchups in the passing game that allow the QB to be very quick with his decision making."

Sweet.[/quote]

We're all hoping that what we hear, is just a fraction of what we're going to see when it all begins to matter........httr

DCtoAZ 06-03-2010 11:46 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Is it September yet ?

GTripp0012 06-03-2010 11:49 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Shanahan definately has a bit of control freak in him, which is what you want when it comes to dicating match-ups. Zorn was pretty indifferent as to who was matching up with who, which helped us in some situations, I think, but hurt us in many others.

Then again, it's Kyle who will be exploiting the match-ups.

skinsfan69 06-03-2010 12:48 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Isn't every QB rusty in OTA and mini camp practices? This means nothing. They were dead on about Tebow. One of the worst picks I've seen in a while.

tryfuhl 06-03-2010 01:14 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
This article is pretty outdated though. It's just asking about current thoughts on players in their situations, based on film... There has been no film for months and months.

30gut 06-03-2010 04:25 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Talk about well defined reads.
Dude are gonna be flat out wide-open more then we've seen in a long time.

Slingin Sammy 33 06-03-2010 04:28 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=skinsfan69;704684]Isn't every QB rusty in OTA and mini camp practices? This means nothing. They were dead on about Tebow. [B]One of the worst picks I've seen in a while.[/B][/quote]Agreed 100%.

Dirtbag59 06-03-2010 04:56 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=backrow;704621]Season is toast! Time for Rexy or Pineapple! :)[/quote]

The Eagles traded McNabb..wait for it.....FOR A REASON. What is that reason? Why I don't have the slightest idea. However I do sound smart when I invoke the 'for a reason' rational.

30gut 06-03-2010 06:08 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=Dirtbag359;704786]The Eagles traded McNabb..wait for it.....FOR A REASON. What is that reason? Why I don't have the slightest idea. However I do sound smart when I invoke the 'for a reason' rational.[/quote]

Of course they traded him for a reason.

They have faith in Kolb obviously, they groomed him and they don't want to lose their QB of the future via FA.
Much like the Packers with Rodgers/Favre.
The difference is that Packers were so bent on keeping Favre out the division that they didn't get much by way of compensation for Favre.
The Eagles FO saw what happended with Favre as a cautionary tale, realizing that McNabb will eventually end up where he wants to go they may as well try to get compensation for him.

I would like to claim this as my own opinion but i heard it from John Clayton first.

ethat001 06-04-2010 11:26 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
Yeah, it still surprises me that they let McNabb go.
- Sure, the eagles haven't gone anywhere for years -- but then again, they were *so close*, and now have young WRs.
- Sure, they think they have something with Kolb -- but then again, they already had a ProBowl QB.
- Sure, McNabb probably only has 3-4 years left -- but why trade him within-division?

I just can't come up with a "reason"... yet. But I agree there's something to it..

backrow 06-05-2010 06:21 PM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
[quote=ethat001;705027]Yeah, it still surprises me that they let McNabb go.
- Sure, the eagles haven't gone anywhere for years -- but then again, they were *so close*, and now have young WRs.
- Sure, they think they have something with Kolb -- but then again, they already had a ProBowl QB.
- Sure, [B]McNabb probably only has 3-4 years left [/B]-- but why trade him within-division?

I just can't come up with a "reason"... yet. But I agree there's something to it..[/quote]



I think only 2 or 3. That's my new name for McNabb! 2&3! That's what he costs, that's what he is. At least through the part of the season that leads to the POs. After that, he will have earned his usual 5!

ethat001 01-06-2011 03:01 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
So after the season is done:

McNabb (13 games): 3377 yards, 14 td, 15 int
J.Campbell (13 games): 2387 yards, 13 td, 8 int

We traded McNabb for 2nd (2010) and 4th (2011)
We traded JC for 4th rounder (2012)

Basically we wasted a 2nd rounder for McNabb, and JC played better than him this year. I think most did not want McNabb - but were conflicted/okay with the trade at the time -- but in hindsight this was a complete waste of a 2nd rounder. Hard to stomach that in the beginning of a coach's tenure -- hope it doesn't happen again. We need all our picks going forward.

Beemnseven 01-06-2011 06:59 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
While there's absolutely nothing to base this on, I feel comfortable saying that if JC was still here, the stats and results would have been about the same.

We'd have two more draft picks of course, and that's what makes the trade for McNabb indefensible at this point. Still, I don't know that "most did not want" him. I'd say it was pretty even for and against.

Playing the 'what if' game for a moment ... If JC wasn't here, if they didn't make the trade for McNabb, and they stuck it out with Rex or some other journeyman QB all year -- there would have been a lot of people wondering what might have been if we had a quarterback worth anything for the 2010 season.

hooskins 01-06-2011 09:27 AM

Re: Greg Cosell on McNabb, Campbell, and Others
 
I would say Oakland was an overall better fit for JC than we were for McNabb. Oakland has good line, decent run game and a great D. I can't say we had/have any of those.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.14800 seconds with 9 queries