Giants sign Burress
 

(or is it Giant's...)

6 years, $25 million.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

that's pretty cheap.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

any link to confirm this? If this is true then Gardner could be the next WR to sign.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

It's being reported on ESPN2 by Pasquerrelli (sp).

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2015570[/url]

[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2015570[/url]

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

it's a good barometer of what we should pay moss... there's no way to justify paying someone with an injury bug more than burress (even if he has outperformed plax when healthy).

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

Yea Hopefully' Gardner Is Next

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

:coach: You mean Rod hasn't been traded YET?????!?!?!?!?!!
What's taking so long???

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

i'dd trade Rod for some more Kililans right now!

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I think we are waiting till April fools day before we do he Gardner trade:silly:

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

Justs a question.. who is the best WR in the NFL rjight now thatss not RAndy Mos?

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]Justs a question.. who is the best WR in the NFL rjight now thatss not RAndy Mos?[/QUOTE]


T.O, I hate the guy but you have to give credit where its due. The guy is a game changing player. You could see it from the Super-Bowl. Marvin Harrison and Torry Holt are proboly the next on the list but I just dont see them as game changing players.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

TO. Hands down. I'd rather have TO than Randy Moss personally.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I was afreaid peopel would say that..

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I'd throw chad johnson's name into that list he stepped it up and is legit

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

Dedicated to Rod drop it like its hot gardner

NA NA NA NA.... NA NA NA NAH HEY HEY HEY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD BYYYYYYYYYYYYE

HAPPY SAINT PATTIES DAY!!!:party-smi

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

Now I can see us picking Antrl Rolle in the first or Antwaun Rogers later in the draft to battle with the big Wideouts in the NFC east.They both are big corners and can do damage with the right coaching

Philly=TO
NewYork=Plax
Dallas= Keyshawn
Washington= ????

Maybe we will be agressive for Mike Williams in the draft. One thing, I am glad we got Shawn Taylor because he has no problem smacking around the number one recievers in our division. The only player that made dicked him this season was Randy Moss and he's in the AFC now.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I just want to se4e sean btich slap keyswhan again

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=diehardskin2982]Now I can see us picking Antrl Rolle in the first or Antwaun Rogers later in the draft to battle with the big Wideouts in the NFC east.They both are big corners and can do damage with the right coaching

Philly=TO
NewYork=Plax
Dallas= Keyshawn
Washington= ????

Maybe we will be agressive for Mike Williams in the draft. One thing, I am glad we got Shawn Taylor because he has no problem smacking around the number one recievers in our division. The only player that made dicked him this season was Randy Moss and he's in the AFC now.[/QUOTE]

who is antwuan rogers? or did you mean carlos rogers? and how late did you expect to get him? he's gonna go in the first round.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

i was hoping to get ronald bartell from howard. i know williams can help just about any player as long as they have speed and size. and at 6'1 211lbs and runs a 4.37 40, i hope we sneak him in the third round whether we get trade gardner or not. i really hope we get a second third rounder for gardner and address CB and DE in one round. MLB and TE in later rounds.

1. Mike Williams / Braylon Edwards / Troy Williamson (dont have a problem with troy at 9)
2. none
3. Bill Swancutt DE (oregon st.)
3. (assuming gardner trade) Ronald Bartell CB (Howard)
4. Marcus Lawrence MLB (south carolina)
5. Anthony Curtis TE (portland st.)
6. Anthony Bryant DT (alabama)
7. Leroy Hill MLB/ST (clemson)

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=diehardskin2982]Now I can see us picking Antrl Rolle in the first or Antwaun Rogers later in the draft to battle with the big Wideouts in the NFC east.They both are big corners and can do damage with the right coaching

Philly=TO
NewYork=Plax
Dallas= Keyshawn
Washington= ????

Maybe we will be agressive for Mike Williams in the draft. One thing, I am glad we got Shawn Taylor because he has no problem smacking around the number one recievers in our division. The only player that made dicked him this season was Randy Moss and he's in the AFC now.[/QUOTE]

I dont recall Taylor getting dicked by Moss , if I remember correctly I saw on one play where Taylor outjumped Moss to keep him from catching the ball.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]Justs a question.. who is the best WR in the NFL rjight now thatss not RAndy Mos?[/QUOTE]

Going with Chad Johnson. Put him on a team with a decent QB and he's crushing TO's numbers.

And I agree that the way the NFC East is shaping up, a big, strong CB like Rolle might be a really good pickup. Not to mention, the more I look at the scouting reports on the WRs this year, the more I like the idea of trading down or picking up someone from a D-1 or D-2 conference in a later round. ESPN said that there could be 15 WRs taken on the FIRST DAY! With the draft being that deep I think the wiser move is to move down and acquire more picks, [i]or[/i] spend the #9 on one of the top 2 CBs (if they are still there) and get a WR in round 3. Another option: combine our existing 3rd round pick and whatever we get for Gardner to try to get a #2, and get our WR there.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I had a dream last night that the Skins traded the #9 pick and Gardner to move up to the #2 pick to take Edwards.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I had a dream last night that the Skins traded the #9 pick and Gardner to move up to the #2 pick to take Edwards.[/QUOTE]
I think we ought to operate under the presumption that Nick Saban isn't that stupid.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

Matty, I like that scenario!

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=BrudLee]I think we ought to operate under the presumption that Nick Saban isn't that stupid.[/QUOTE]

We should also assume my dreams may tend to be a little biased towards the Skins LOL

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I had a dream last night that the Skins traded the #9 pick and Gardner to move up to the #2 pick to take Edwards.[/QUOTE]

Extreme Skins has posted an interview with Cerrato. Towards the end of the interview, he said that the Redskins have no interest in moving up because after the 5th pick, the money required to sign the rookie significantly drops off. But he may be holding his cards a little to close, I dont know.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I had a dream last night that the Skins traded the #9 pick and Gardner to move up to the #2 pick to take Edwards.[/QUOTE]

Matty...

Let's work on those dreams shall we. If this is a reflection of your subconscience desires, I suggest you go buy a Penthouse. Or just pick up SI's swimsuit issue. - Just some friendly advice from a concerned fellow fan.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

A sample from Matty's dreams:

"Oh yeah, oh yeah...yeah I like when you do that Danny....yeah that's it, trade up, trade up, TRADE UP!!! Oh god! I love it when you trade up like that...Ahh! you've hit the #2 spot, just how I like it"

"What the Niners took Edwards #1?! Mike Nolan you've been a bad boy. Do you need to be spanked!"

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]A sample from Matty's dreams:

"Oh yeah, oh yeah...yeah I like when you do that Danny....yeah that's it, trade up, trade up, TRADE UP!!! Oh god! I love it when you trade up like that...Ahh! you've hit the #2 spot, just how I like it"

"What the Niners took Edwards #1?! Mike Nolan you've been a bad boy. Do you need to be spanked!"[/QUOTE]
You gross me out smootieflakes.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]A sample from Matty's dreams:

"Oh yeah, oh yeah...yeah I like when you do that Danny....yeah that's it, trade up, trade up, TRADE UP!!! Oh god! I love it when you trade up like that...Ahh! you've hit the #2 spot, just how I like it"

"What the Niners took Edwards #1?! Mike Nolan you've been a bad boy. Do you need to be spanked!"[/QUOTE]

:laughing2

Omigod that was HILARIOUS. An unfortunate mental picture, but laugh-till-you-puke funny.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

I think I'm gonna be sick :vomit-smi

You know what's good after puking, yep you got it :Smoker:

Helps get the taste out of your mouth

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]A sample from Matty's dreams:

"Oh yeah, oh yeah...yeah I like when you do that Danny....yeah that's it, trade up, trade up, TRADE UP!!! Oh god! I love it when you trade up like that...Ahh! you've hit the #2 spot, just how I like it"

"What the Niners took Edwards #1?! Mike Nolan you've been a bad boy. Do you need to be spanked!"[/QUOTE]

Thats the funniest thing I have ever read on this site. :laughing2

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=Gmanc711]T.O, I hate the guy but you have to give credit where its due. The guy is a game changing player. You could see it from the Super-Bowl. Marvin Harrison and Torry Holt are proboly the next on the list but I just dont see them as game changing players.[/QUOTE]

After Moss I'd personally say right now it'd probably be TO, but in a year or 2 I could easily see Boldin or Roy Williams if they stay healthy fighting for that spot. and of course if the skins take williams or edwards I would love for them to be even mentioned in this type of discussion in a few years.


and dude TAFKAS, your kinda weirding me out a little :nono:

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=skinsfanthru&thru]After Moss I'd personally say right now it'd probably be TO, but in a year or 2 I could easily see Boldin or Roy Williams if they stay healthy fighting for that spot. and of course if the skins take williams or edwards I would love for them to be even mentioned in this type of discussion in a few years.


and dude TAFKAS, your kinda weirding me out a little :nono:[/QUOTE]

I dont know about Boldin quite yet; but I havent really been able to watch him enough to say yes or no. However; Roy Williams is going to be one of the top 3 recivers in the league within the next two years. The guy makes just some amazing catches and he runs nice routes. I'm actually kind of excited to watch him and Charels Rogers on the same feild this year (if Rogers can stay healthy). I think that with the each guy taking the pressure off one another, they could be one of hte most dangerous reciving tandems in the league.

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=skinsfanthru&thru]After Moss I'd personally say right now it'd probably be TO, but in a year or 2 I could easily see Boldin or Roy Williams if they stay healthy fighting for that spot. and of course if the skins take williams or edwards I would love for them to be even mentioned in this type of discussion in a few years.


and dude TAFKAS, your kinda weirding me out a little :nono:[/QUOTE]

I'm kinda weirding myself out....I think Andre Johnson is another young reciever who could be listed among the best ones in a year or two

Re: Giants sign Burress
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]I'm kinda weirding myself out....I think Andre Johnson is another young reciever who could be listed among the best ones in a year or two[/QUOTE]

I like Andre 2 as well as Mark Clayton. There r definitely a few young wrs with the talent to be great wrs when all is said and done. And even though I think he was overhyped last year, but still a very very good wr, Fitzgerald is also in the category of potential star in the making. If the players remained healthy, how freakin scary could the 2 tandems of Charles Rogers and Roy Williams & A.(don't feel like looking up how to spell his name) Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald be as they are all very young and enormously talented?