Potential trades
 

I think it's most likely they stick with this roster, barring FA pickups and any injury needs. But if they're willing and there's a good trade available, what do you think they should be looking for?

I'd be tempted to look at edge and CB now. i.e. Reddick is a slim possibility (too disruptive maybe?). But he'd love to stick it to the Eagles twice a year!

But who's out there? Who makes it worth a draft pick or 2 to get them now? Who can we afford to trade away?

Re: Potential trades
 

I can’t imagine we bring anybody in, barring injury/unforeseen need occurring.

Trading [I]away[/I] though? Anybody outside of this years draft class, BRob or Cosmi could be gone.

The FO clearly has no issue purging this roster and while we have a few decent pieces, there’s nobody who’s “untradable.” If a team calls with a strong enough offer guys like Terry, Allen, Payne could all be dealt and I wouldn’t be shocked.

This is a proper rebuild.

Potential trades
 

I swear so many other teams turn it around in one season, but somehow Daniels will be an aged vet by the time we get pieces around help the secondary.

Re: Potential trades
 

For folks who wanted Ayuik trade, his numbers thru 3 weeks

11 catches, 119 yards and zero TD

Making no impact on a team that needs him with multiple people out.

Re: Potential trades
 

I was not onboard a trade for Ayuik but using the 1st 3 games as some sort of measuring stick is unfair, we all know he is a very good receiver. While I don't want any part of trading draft capital, and the team feels the same obviously, I don't see why they have to punt on this season. The CB situation is already dire, wouldn't mind seeing them take a run at Xavien Howard, Assumng he is healthy why not sign him for multiple years and fill a huge need?

Re: Potential trades
 

We shouldn't consider trading for any players unless we can get a long-term starter for mid/late round pick. We are in rebuilding mode so it's not logical to give away our capitals for a player that will not be with us after 2-3 years later.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=GridIron26;1364883]We shouldn't consider trading for any players unless we can get a long-term starter for mid/late round pick. We are in rebuilding mode so it's not logical to give away our capitals for a player that will not be with us after 2-3 years later.[/quote]

I think it all will depend on where our record stands in week 9. If we have a winning record and the playoffs is a possibility, I'm fine with using mid-round picks to get a starter that can help the team.

If not, we should stay put.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=Chico23231;1364879]For folks who wanted Ayuik trade, his numbers thru 3 weeks

11 catches, 119 yards and zero TD

Making no impact on a team that needs him with multiple people out.[/quote]He also had drops in the opening game. Didn't want him after he stated SF didn't want him anymore since he didn't get a raise and after he showed our formation. Glad he stayed in SF.

Re: Potential trades
 

I don't think many people wanted to dump cap + picks for him (Ayuik).

I don't see the team doing much in-season. I'm sure they'll make calls, I'm doubtful someone's going to give us a #1 CB or DE though. Teams don't ever want to trade those away barring crazy drama.

Re: Potential trades
 

Yeah, I don't think there are teams with depth at CB and DE that want to give up a young guy in a trade right now. But is there a possibility of teams getting to game 5/6/7 and being under .500 and unlikely to make the playoffs maybe thinking about rebuilding next year? One or two more losses and Cincy could be doomed...

Re: Potential trades
 

I hate to say it but Jonathan Allen has been noticeably quiet to start the season, given how much money we have tied up in two DT's if his quiet start lingers they might put him on the table. He makes too much money to not be producing. At least Payne had some highlights last night.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=mooby;1365027]I hate to say it but Jonathan Allen has been noticeably quiet to start the season, given how much money we have tied up in two DT's if his quiet start lingers they might put him on the table. He makes too much money to not be producing. At least Payne had some highlights last night.[/quote]

you mean his missed tackles (payne)? seemed he had like 4 last night.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=mooby;1365027]I hate to say it but Jonathan Allen has been noticeably quiet to start the season, given how much money we have tied up in two DT's if his quiet start lingers they might put him on the table. He makes too much money to not be producing. At least Payne had some highlights last night.[/quote]

I’m going to come to their defense, the stunts and positioning they have these guys in is bullshit.
Payne missed a tackle rushing off the edge.
Allen was gassed playing mostly looping stunts.
These guys need to in the middle and force everything wide.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=jamf;1365056]I’m going to come to their defense, the stunts and positioning they have these guys in is bullshit.
Payne missed a tackle rushing off the edge.
Allen was gassed playing mostly looping stunts.
These guys need to in the middle and force everything wide.[/quote]

Problem is when they do that it shows how poor our DE's/edge rushers are. How many yards did Cincy make on off tackle runs last night? Actually, on that topic, I'd be surprised if Davis isn't on the block. Another wasted RR pick.

Re: Potential trades
 

Not a trade scenario, but earlier in the year I said pass on Stephone Gilmore CB on a 1 year deal.

That was a mistake, we should have brought him in on a 1 year deal. I think CB is our biggest problem on the team.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=mooby;1365027]I hate to say it but Jonathan Allen has been noticeably quiet to start the season, given how much money we have tied up in two DT's if his quiet start lingers they might put him on the table. He makes too much money to not be producing. At least Payne had some highlights last night.[/quote]

Loved this effort by Allen...it was Haynesworth worthy

[url]https://x.com/i/status/1838411586802753654[/url]

Re: Potential trades
 

[QUOTE=BaltimoreSkins;1365093]Loved this effort by Allen...it was Haynesworth worthy



[url]https://x.com/i/status/1838411586802753654[/url][/QUOTE]To be fair he was fighting a double team for the whole play. Other DL need to be winning their 1 on 1's

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Re: Potential trades
 

haynesworth would have seen a pending double team and flopped onto the ground to wait the play out. He was SOOO bad.

Re: Potential trades
 

I think DeFo is going to get traded, FA at the end of the year and cannot make the active roster on game day. Still a steady Safety in a league where many lack that.
Mariota to a desperate Miami?

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=EdmundDorf;1365261]I think DeFo is going to get traded, FA at the end of the year and cannot make the active roster on game day. Still a steady Safety in a league where many lack that.
Mariota to a desperate Miami?[/quote]

DeFo?

I don't see us trading Mariota away. The announcers in the game last Sunday mentioned that Mariota is playing a role in helping JD learning the QB position, so I would be kinda surprised if we give that up.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=GridIron26;1365263]DeFo?

I don't see us trading Mariota away. The announcers in the game last Sunday mentioned that Mariota is playing a role in helping JD learning the QB position, so I would be kinda surprised if we give that up.[/quote]

Darrick Forrest. As for Mariota, a desperate Miami, or other team, might make an offer AP can't resist, just a question of what is the threshold... but it would have to be a desperate team in order to make a move with sufficient return. Just spitballing. Not sure there is anyone else who is disposable and worth anything.

Re: Potential trades
 

I really really really do not Want us to trade for Davante Adams, I don’t see the need, this offense is clicking on all cylinders and all the receivers seem to be doing a great job. I don’t see the need to tie up a lot of money in another wide receiver.

Re: Potential trades
 

Adams would be such a Snyder move.

It's not going to happen under Peters.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=MTK;1365306]Adams would be such a Snyder move.

It's not going to happen under Peters.[/quote]

I was thinking the same thing about Snyder, and I sure hope youÂ’re right about Peters not pulling the trigger

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=MTK;1365306]Adams would be such a Snyder move.

It's not going to happen under Peters.[/quote]

Probably not, however...they do have the cap space and could always restructure his contract, and if you only have to give up a third? Whose to say in 3 more games if you could see that another elite WR would put you over the top and he's still out there...it could be worth considering.

Re: Potential trades
 

I don't want to trade for Adams but if we do...wow, fuck yeah, we have Adams, our offense is going to be insane.

I'm ready for either option baby. Ahhh, didn't need him....fuck yeah....we're all in even for 2024

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=MTK;1365306]Adams would be such a Snyder move.

It's not going to happen under Peters.[/quote]
There's this gem.
[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/Commanders/comments/1ef7cj0/devante_adams_talks_poorly_about_washington/[/url]

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=jamf;1365311]There's this gem.
[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/Commanders/comments/1ef7cj0/devante_adams_talks_poorly_about_washington/[/url][/quote]

fuck him then

Re: Potential trades
 

Adams is going to NYJ we've all known this for a yr lol

I don't see us trading for anyone

Re: Potential trades
 

Young starting quality DE and/or CB? I'd certainly be sniffing around if I was Peters. But I wouldn't bite unless its the right deal, with a good contract to follow. Get a guy you're confident can deliver for 3-5 years now or wait and see what you can get in the draft?

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=AnonEmouse;1365316]Young starting quality DE and/or CB? I'd certainly be sniffing around if I was Peters. But I wouldn't bite unless its the right deal, with a good contract to follow. Get a guy you're confident can deliver for 3-5 years now or wait and see what you can get in the draft?[/quote]

Not too many young, good players traded in general, but definitely not at those positions.

I think we're going to hold tight. Already exceeding expectations. Keep those picks and use all that cap space in the offseason.

We might be dope as fuck in 2025.

Re: Potential trades
 

No to Adam's b/c of the ask for a 2nd rounder+ ... plus his type of contract ... plus anything making any waves in the current chemistry of the team

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1365318]Not too many young, good players traded in general, but definitely not at those positions.

I think we're going to hold tight. Already exceeding expectations. Keep those picks and use all that cap space in the offseason.

We might be dope as fuck in 2025.[/quote]

Agreed, nobody at the edge position aside from Reddick making unsettled noises. And he's no spring chicken. A trade would have to be tempting for the other team if they're struggling and looking to rebuild maybe? But probably too expensive. CB though?

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1365318]Not too many young, good players traded in general, but definitely not at those positions.

I think we're going to hold tight. Already exceeding expectations. Keep those picks and use all that cap space in the offseason.

We might be dope as fuck in 2025.[/quote]

We are currently playing with house money…there’s no better position for a team than to have a star qb on a friendly rookie contract…we can build a contender for the next decade…while reshaping and upgrading our defense. CB and pass rushers are priority.

How good can we be with how little we spent? That’s the beauty of JD5 elevating everyone’s play, there is no ceiling yet…we hit the lottery. Yes indeed

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=ThirdEyeSquad28;1365352]We are currently playing with house money…there’s no better position for a team than to have a star qb on a friendly rookie contract…we can build a contender for the next decade…while reshaping and upgrading our defense. CB and pass rushers are priority.

How good can we be with how little we spent? That’s the beauty of JD5 elevating everyone’s play, there is no ceiling yet…we hit the lottery. Yes indeed[/quote]

I did some mock drafts last night. Huge difference from prior years in mind-set. This was to see how we can improve from good story to legitimate NFL threat. It's weird what elite QB play can do. With our crazy amount of cap space and 4 picks in the 1st 3 rounds, we have a chance to be a really really good football team in 2025. Looking at CB1, DE1, a Safety to pair with Quann Martin, and an OT.

Re: Potential trades
 

[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1365373]I did some mock drafts last night. Huge difference from prior years in mind-set. This was to see how we can improve from good story to legitimate NFL threat. It's weird what elite QB play can do. With our crazy amount of cap space and 4 picks in the 1st 3 rounds, we have a chance to be a really really good football team in 2025. Looking at CB1, DE1, a Safety to pair with Quann Martin, and an OT.[/QUOTE]


Bout to dig in to some mocks with QB in place. Exciting.

Re: Potential trades
 

[quote=ThirdEyeSquad28;1365352]We are currently playing with house money…there’s no better position for a team than to have a star qb on a friendly rookie contract…we can build a contender for the next decade…while reshaping and upgrading our defense. CB and pass rushers are priority.

How good can we be with how little we spent? That’s the beauty of JD5 elevating everyone’s play, there is no ceiling yet…we hit the lottery. Yes indeed[/quote]

I will continue to laugh at the few who do not believe you need a franchise QB for lasting success. I could never convince them that a franchise QB makes EVERYONE better, especially receivers. They would argue Mark Rypien or Joe Flacco and would not listen when I stated that during their run they PLAYED like franchise QBs. But once they reverted so did the team.

Everyone should know by now that trying to go on a run for title contention with an average QB and a loaded roster is just taking the long, hard route with very low odds, we just don't have a track record of too many teams doing this successfully. But we have seen a ton of teams with true franchise QBs stay in contention as long as they have that QB playing at that level.

We have this now. Barring injury there is just no way Jayden Daneis will not be a franchise QB, I predict he will be a star and a real difference maker. So getting back to your point we are in a great position to have a really good team by next year.

Re: Potential trades
 

I mean Gibbs 1 was OLINE and skill players with rotating QBs. that's definitely the harder way to do it though.

We should probably just grab Nabers whenever his contract runs out. That would be ridiculous.

Re: Potential trades
 

Is there a man - corner out there available? No harm in calling

Re: Potential trades
 

It's not a matter of if there's a guy available its whether or not he can be better than what we have, especially for the price. There's a whole list of guys available, probably top of the list is Xavien Howard. But is any one of them an upgrade and/or not a big cap hit? Do we chase someone now that's likely to be here for 11 games at most, then possibly costing us with next years cap situation? If we can upgrade over BSJ and Forbes, then maybe its worth it. But I suspect Peters and Quinn have agreed to see how this year goes as is, then use the draft to fill the key DE and DB holes.