Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!! (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=9091)

jamf 11-17-2005 03:26 AM

Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[url]http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=4041[/url]

:)

BigSKINBauer 11-17-2005 06:40 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
thats really cool, hopefully we got more in second place

Beemnseven 11-17-2005 07:33 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
Not really sure why Thrash deserves to be on the list. I mean, if he gets it, fine, isn't there someone else from the Skins who should be considered besides Thrash?

That Guy 11-17-2005 07:34 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
is there a place to see the current results?

That Guy 11-17-2005 07:36 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=Beemnseven]Not really sure why Thrash deserves to be on the list. I mean, if he gets it, fine, isn't there someone else from the Skins who should be considered besides Thrash?[/QUOTE]

watch him run gunner on coverage... he's double jammed every time, because last year when he wasn't he kept downing punts inside the 5 yard line.

MTK 11-17-2005 08:48 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
Anyone else think Cooley should be listed as a TE?

onlydarksets 11-17-2005 08:57 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Anyone else think Cooley should be listed as a TE?[/QUOTE]

That came up in an article in the WP about the H-back system. His position is so fluid that it's not really definable by the current position designations. He lines up at FB/TE/WR, but, of the three, I would agree that he is more TE than anything else.

davy 11-17-2005 08:58 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Anyone else think Cooley should be listed as a TE?[/QUOTE]
He should be but he has a much better chance of going to the Pro Bowl as a Fullback than he would have if listed as a Tight End.

illdefined 11-17-2005 09:09 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=davy]He should be but he has a much better chance of going to the Pro Bowl as a Fullback than he would have if listed as a Tight End.[/QUOTE]

not really, he's only behind Shockey for yards. Mike Sellers should be considered for the Pro-Bowl as a FB.

MTK 11-17-2005 09:11 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
Regardless of where they list him, Cooley is definitely Pro Bowl material. He's on pace for over 70 catches and 800 yards, that's a damn good season for any TE.

onlydarksets 11-17-2005 09:17 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=That Guy]is there a place to see the current results?[/QUOTE]

I did some searching but couldn't find anything. Maybe they only release the results to the teams?

jermus22 11-17-2005 09:20 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
I'm especially rooting for Brunell; he at least deserves comeback player of the year.

davy 11-17-2005 09:21 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
Reputation means so much in Pro Bowl voting unfortunately. You would have to think he would be behind Crumpler, Shockey and maybe even Witten as a TE.

BrudLee 11-17-2005 09:22 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
We sould all be voting every day for our guys. Stuff that ballot box!

Redskins_P 11-17-2005 12:10 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
I think if Portis can get in the endzone at least 3 or 4 more times, he has a good chance to get it.

I think Randy Thomas should be in there. Cooley and Moss are a lock right now.

VishsSkins 11-17-2005 04:10 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=Redskins_P]
I think Randy Thomas should be in there. Cooley and Moss are a lock right now.[/QUOTE] I definitely agree. Thomas has been probably the most consistent guy on our offensive line this year.

D'BOYZ 11-17-2005 06:40 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
We also have 3 guys leading in their respective position

Drew Bledsoe All QB NFC
Larry Allen All G NFC
and Roy Williams SS All NFC

of the 3 only Larry Allen shound't in my point be leading he's not the top guard maybe second or third but not first

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 11-17-2005 07:16 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]We also have 3 guys leading in their respective position

Drew Bledsoe All QB NFC
Larry Allen All G NFC
and Roy Williams SS All NFC

of the 3 only Larry Allen shound't in my point be leading he's not the top guard maybe second or third but not first[/QUOTE]

All three deserve to be the in the Pro Bowl, but I don't think Roy Williams deserves to be the top SS. Williams makes great hits, but I don't think he's the best in the conference. The Iggles' Michael Lewis is a better strong safety - he's more versatile.

That Guy 11-18-2005 12:20 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
the best SSs are in the afc (palamalou and reed)... I don't think the NFC has anyone who even compares.

EternalEnigma21 11-18-2005 08:48 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
well they finally have arrington on there... his stats are almost tied with the middle of the pack and he's only started 3 games.

dmek25 11-18-2005 10:51 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
how is marcus washington not one of the top linebackers in the nfc?week after week he just keeps on making plays

That Guy 11-18-2005 11:20 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=dmek25]how is marcus washington not one of the top linebackers in the nfc?week after week he just keeps on making plays[/QUOTE]

how many highlight reel hits on espn? that's probably why...

D'BOYZ 11-18-2005 11:28 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=Ramseyfan]All three deserve to be the in the Pro Bowl, but I don't think Roy Williams deserves to be the top SS. Williams makes great hits, but I don't think he's the best in the conference. The Iggles' Michael Lewis is a better strong safety - he's more versatile.[/QUOTE]

It's also like moss he's having a great season but he's not the best receiver in the NFC right now that title goes to S.Smith and I really don't think anyone can argue that and still moss leads teh voting.

dmek25 11-19-2005 11:36 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
no way larry allen belongs.just like champ,strictly reputation

PSUskinsfan11 11-19-2005 01:00 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
They finally put LaVar on the ballot!!!!! I would love to see him make the pro bowl just to give a nice told you so to the organization. :woot:

Sheriff Gonna Getcha 11-19-2005 01:02 PM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]It's also like moss he's having a great season but he's not the best receiver in the NFC right now that title goes to S.Smith and I really don't think anyone can argue that and still moss leads teh voting.[/QUOTE]

You're right, good counter-argument.

I promise you Steve Smith will ask for a contract re-negotiation within the next year or two. Smith signed a six year $28 million contract extension a year ago and he deserves a ton more than that.

That Guy 11-20-2005 04:52 AM

Re: Probowl voting 3 skins in the lead!!!
 
[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]It's also like moss he's having a great season but he's not the best receiver in the NFC right now that title goes to S.Smith and I really don't think anyone can argue that and still moss leads teh voting.[/QUOTE]

except when the defenses double smith, he gets shut down. 3 games with under 35 yards (moss only has 1, that awful nyg game :P), less 40+ yarders, and smith has a slightly better QB that he's worked with before. Either way, smith has 9 TDs, and obviously has had some insane games (170 3td, 201yds 1 TD).

Its only a 2 yard difference, but the 4 extra TDs would tend to sway my opinion a bit.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.29774 seconds with 9 queries